36 research outputs found
ΠΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ° I ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π°ΠΎΡΡΡ. ΠΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΠΉ
Introduction. According to the national clinical recommendations, endovascular intervention should be used in the case of infrarenal aneurysm of aorta or common iliac artery in patients with high risk of cardiopulmonary complications during open surgery or serious concurrent conditions. However, despite the reduced risk of minimal invasive intervention, the likelihood of complications remains: the most common of these is endoleak. Type I endoleak is caused by stent graft failure in the area of proximal or distal fixation, leading to an increase of pressure inside the aneurysmal pouch, which can cause it to rupture. In this clinical case, the cause of the endoleak was the short neck of the aneurysm with severe angulation. Leakages of this type must be eliminated by means of a retentive intraluminal cuff or by open surgery. However, the emergency of open surgical intervention in patients with baseline organ dysfunction increases the frequency of complications, often neutralising the advantages of the original endovascular intervention.Materials and methods. The clinical case example demonstrates the effectiveness of embolisation of the endoleak area in a patient with severe cardiac pathology as an alternative to open surgery.Results and discussion. Following elective endovascular implantation of the prosthesis on the control, angiograms are determined by endoleak type I in the area of proximal fixation of endoprosthesis. This is presumably due to incomplete adhesion of endoprosthesis body in the area of the right renal artery. The decision was taken to embolise the zone of leakage. Using a 190.0 cm Abbott Whisper MS 0.014 guide-wire, an Ev3 Rebar-18 2.4F/2.7F. microcatheter was pulled across the area of leakage into the aneurysmatic pouch. An Onyx 18Β β 1.5 ml liquid embolic system was pulled through a microcatheter to the area of leakage. Control angiographyΒ β embolisation was found to be sufficient. There were no signs of non-target embolisation.Conclusion. If a surgeon is sufficiently experienced and technically capable, type I endoleak embolisation can become a method of choice in the treatment of patients with high-risk open surgery.ΠΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π‘ΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ Π°ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌ Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π»Π΅Π³ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ
ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π·Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΏΡΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ. ΠΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ, Π½Π΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΎΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π°, ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠΊ, ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠΌ ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊ. ΠΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊ I ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ Π½Π΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ° Π°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π²ΡΠ·Π²Π°ΡΡ Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΡΠ². Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΡΠ°Π»Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠ° Π°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ Ρ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Π½Π³ΠΈΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ. ΠΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΠΊΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π°. ΠΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π° Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ°Π΅Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π·Π°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ Π½ΠΈΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΈΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π°.ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π·ΠΎΠ½Ρ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ° Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Ρ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π°Π»ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π° ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π° Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π°Π½Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊ I ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π°, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ»Π΅Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π° ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π° Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ. Π Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π·ΠΎΠ½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Abbott Whisper MS 0,014Β β 190,0 ΡΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· Π·ΠΎΠ½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²Β Π°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Ρ Ev3 Rebar-18 2.4F/2.7F. Π§Π΅ΡΠ΅Π· ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Ρ Π² Π·ΠΎΠ½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ΄ΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° Onyx 18Β β 1,5 ΠΌΠ». ΠΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π°Π½Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΒ β ΡΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Π½Π° Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ. ΠΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ² Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π΅Ρ.ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΡΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ° Ρ Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³Π° ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ° IΒ ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° Π² Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ.
ΠΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π°Π±Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ
Chronic mesenteric ischaemia constitutes a condition characterised by a decreased abdominal blood flow, which is caused by the obstruction of visceral arteries. This short communication paper presents a clinical case of endovascular treatment in a patient with the obstruction of the celiac trunk, superior and inferior mesenteric arteries. Intestinal blood supply was provided through collaterals from the system of internal iliac veins via the inferior mesenteric artery, the arc of Riolan. This clinical case confirmed that percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of the visceral arteries is the method of choice in the surgical treatment of abdominal angina.Π‘ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌ Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°Π±Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈΒ β ΡΡΠΎ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅, Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Ρ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² Π±ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π²ΡΠ·Π²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π²ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ. Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΠΉ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Ρ ΠΎΠΊΠΊΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ»Π°, Π²Π΅ΡΡ
Π½Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ½Π΅ΠΉ Π±ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½Π°Π±ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ· Π±Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ² Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π²Π΅Π½ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ½ΡΡ Π±ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡ, Π΄ΡΠ³Ρ Π ΠΈΠΎΠ»Π°Π½Π°. ΠΠ°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ»ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π°Π½Π³ΠΈΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ
ΠΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ β ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π΄Π²ΡΡ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ
Purpose: to study the possibilities of contrast enhanced dual-energy spectral mammography (CESM) in the diagnostics of malignant tumors in the breast.Material and methods. Forty-seven patients with suspicious for breast cancer (BC) lesions underwent CESM. Digital mammography (MMG) and post-contrast images were correlated with the results of path morphological studies after surgery or puncture biopsy was performed.Results. Sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy in the diagnostics of breast cancer were 83.3%, 85.7%, 85.1% for digital mammography and 91.6%, 91.4%, 91.4% for CESM, respectively. The positive predictive value was 66.6% for digital MMG and 78.5% for CESM. The negative predictive value (NPV) was 96.9% for the CESM and exceeded NPV of the digital MMG, which was 93.7%.Conclusion. Thus, these findings suggest that CESM is an effective method for the diagnostics of malignant tumors in the breast.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ: ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π²ΡΡ
ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ (Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography β CESM) Π² Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π·Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ.ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. 47 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΊΠ°ΠΌ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π½Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ (Π ΠΠ) Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π° CESM. ΠΠ»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ (ΠΠΠ) ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΠΠ+ CESM Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. Π§ΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ, ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ Π² Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π ΠΠ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 83,3, 85,7, 85,1% ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ. ΠΡΠ»ΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΠΠ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Ρ CESM, ΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡ Π΄ΠΎ 91,6, 91,4, 91,4% ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ. ΠΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ 66,6%, Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ CESM β 78,5%. ΠΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΠΠ Ρ CESM Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ³Π°Π΅Ρ 96,9% ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡΠ°Π΅Ρ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ β 93,7%.ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. CESM ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΠ Π² Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π·Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Π΅
ΠΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½Ρ ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ β ΠΡΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π°: Π»Π°Π±ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ
In the practice of a doctor of any specialty, patients with hypercorticism β a syndrome of excess glucocorticoids level in the body β are not uncommon. Despite the fact that most of these patients have characteristic appearance and clinical manifestations, the correct diagnosis is often established months or even years after the first complaints.The objective of this article was to demonstrate the clinical cases of patients with hypercorticism of various genesis, as well as a short theoretical reference based on the National Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Cushingβs Syndrome (2016).Π ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π»ΡΠ±ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΊΠΎ Π²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΡ Ρ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΌ β ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ·Π±ΡΡΠΊΠ° Π³Π»ΡΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Π²ΠΈΠ΄ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ· Π·Π°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°Π²Π»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΏΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ Π³ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊ Π²ΡΠ°ΡΡ.Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π² ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π°, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΊΠ° Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΏΠΎ Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΡ ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ β ΠΡΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π° ΠΎΡ 2016 Π³
ΠΠΠΠΠ‘Π ΠΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠΠΠΠ«Π Π ΠΠ’ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ«Π Π ΠΠΠ£ΠΠ¬Π’ΠΠ’Π« ΠΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ’ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠ― ΠΠ Π Π ΠΠ‘Π‘ΠΠΠΠΠΠ―Π₯ Π ΠΠ’ΠΠ ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ’ΠΠ§ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ₯ ΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠ₯ ΠΠ Π£ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ Π’Π«
Objective: to analyze the results of endovascular stent-graftingin dissections and atherosclerotic aneurysms of descending part of thoracic aorta.Material and method: in this analysis includes 28 patients with dissections and atherosclerotic aneurysms of descending part of thoracic aorta. Acute aortic dissection type 3 was occurred in 10 patients and two of them were complicated with rupture into the left pleural cavity. 10 patients with chronic aortic dissection type bunderwent operations and one of them was complicated with rupture into the left pleural cavity. Among 8 operated patients due to chronic aneurysms of descending part of thoracic aorta, 4 patients were manifested with symptoms of hemothorax. In 3 patients with aortic dissection type 1 in long-term period, endovascular stent-grafting was performed concerning with the dilatation of descending thoracic aorta and patent false lumen. During in-hospital and long-term periods immediate clinical results, serious clinical complications and long-term survival were compared.Results: technical success of endovascular stent-grafting was achieved in 100 % of cases. In-hospital mortality was 4 (14,2 %) and 30-day mortality was 3 (10,7 %). Events of paraplegia, TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack), prosthetic infection were not found in our research. Two clinical occurrences of vascular approach site complication were found; one case of endoleak type 1 and stent-graft dislocation which required repeated endovascular stent-grafting and one case of endoleak type 2 which was performed subclaviancarotid bypass and ligation of left subclavian artery. Prolong intubation was needed in 5 patients (18,5 %).conclusion: Endovascular stent-grafting in dissections and atherosclerotic aneurysms of descending part of thoracic aorta contributes good immediate clinical results associating with less quantity of serious complications.Π¦ΠΠΠ¬ ΠΠ‘Π‘ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ―: Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ (ΠΠ) ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΈ Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π³ΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΎΡΡΡ.ΠΠΠ’ΠΠ ΠΠΠΠ« Π ΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠ«: Π² Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ 28 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π³ΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΎΡΡΡ. ΠΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 3 ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ Ρ 10 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΈΠ· Π½ΠΈΡ
Ρ 2 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠ²Π° Π² Π»Π΅Π²ΡΡ ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π²ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΡ. Π‘ Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ 10 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΈΠ· Π½ΠΈΡ
Ρ 1 β ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠ² Π² Π»Π΅Π²ΡΡ ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π²ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΡ. ΠΠ· 8 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π³ΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΎΡΡΡ, Ρ 4 ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ Π² Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ Π³Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ°. Π£ 3 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π°ΠΎΡΡΡ 1 ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° Π² ΠΎΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π΅ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΎΠΌ. Π Π³ΠΎΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ
ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ, ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π·Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ Π²ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ.Π ΠΠΠ£ΠΠ¬Π’ΠΠ’Π«. Π’Π΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠΏΠ΅Ρ
ΠΠ Π±ΡΠ» Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ³Π½ΡΡ Π² 100 % ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π². ΠΠΎΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π»Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»Π° 4 (14,2 %), 30-Π΄Π½Π΅Π²Π½Π°Ρ Π»Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ β 3 (10,7 %). Π‘Π»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π² ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΠΠΠ, ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ° Π² Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ. ΠΠ°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ Π΄Π²Π° ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ°; ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΠΉ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ° 1 ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ-Π³ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°, ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊ 2 ΡΠΈΠΏΠ°, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ·ΠΊΠ° Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠΎΠ΄Π»Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ±Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ Ρ 5 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² (18,5 %).ΠΠ«ΠΠΠΠ«: ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΈ Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Π³ΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΎΡΡΡ Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ Ρ
ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΉ Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ, ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π·Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ
ΠΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π΄Π²ΡΡ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ β ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ
Introduction. Differential diagnosis of some pathological processes in the breast is difficult on the background of dense breast tissue. This often leads to false conclusions and to late diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) or unreasonable biopsy in a benign process. 50% of breast cancers detected less than 12 months after elective mammography were associated with high density of breast tissue. An important advantage of contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is that it does not depend on the size of the lesions and the X-ray density of the breast tissue. Objective. To compare the diagnostic performance of CESM and digital mammography (DM) in detection of breast cancer in a group of women with dense breast tissue.Materials and methods. The data of 438 patients with suspected breast cancer examined from August 2018 to January 2021 were analyzed in the study. The mean age of women was 50 Β± 11 years (from 21 to 86 years). In the study group 154 (35%) malignant and 284 (65%) benign lesions were identified. All lesions were histologically verified. Breast tissue density corresponded to types A and B in 161 patients and corresponded to C and D types in 277 patients according to the ACR classification. 154 cases of breast cancer were identified, including 49 patients with density A and B and 105 patients with density C and D types.Results. Sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of DM were 85.7%, 87.3%, 86.8%, respectively. Diagnostic performance of CESM significantly higher than of DM with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 96.8% (p < 0.001), 93.3% (p = 0.015), 94.5% (p < 0.001), respectively. CESM had high positive and negative predictive values of 88.7% (p = 0.012) and 98.1% (p < 0.001), which exceeded those of DM β 78.6% and 91.9%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of DM and CESM were comparable in women with normal breast density (types A and B according to ACR), but in patients with high breast density (types C and D according to ACR), CESM was significantly more sensitive in detecting breast cancer.Conclusion. Thus, diagnostic efficiency of CESM in detecting breast cancer significantly higher in comparison with digital mammography.ΠΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Π΅ (ΠΠ) Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ (ΠΠ) ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ Π·Π°ΡΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ. ΠΡΠΎ Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΊΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ ΠΊ Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌ Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌ ΠΈ, ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ, ΠΊ Π΄Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π·Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅. 50% ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π² ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ (Π ΠΠ), Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· 12 ΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ βΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΎΠΉβ ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Ρ Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΠ. ΠΠ°ΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π²ΡΡ
ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ (ΠΠΠ‘Π) ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π΅Π΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΠ.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ: ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΠΠ‘Π ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ (ΠΠ) Π² Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π ΠΠ Ρ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½ Ρ ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠ.ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. Π ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ 438 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΊ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π½Π° Π ΠΠ. Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ» 50 Β± 11 Π»Π΅Ρ. Π ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ 154 (35%) Π·Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ 284 (65%) Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠ»Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π° Π³ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π²Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π£ 161 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΠ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»Π° ACR Π- ΠΈ Π-ΡΠΈΠΏΠ°ΠΌ, Π° Ρ 277 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΊ ΠΠ β C- ΠΈ D-ΡΠΈΠΏΠ°ΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ACR. ΠΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ 154 ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π ΠΠ, ΠΈΠ· Π½ΠΈΡ
Ρ 49 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΠ Π±ΡΠ»Π° ACR Π- ΠΈ Π-ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Ρ 105 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΊ β ACR C- ΠΈ D-ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ².Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΡΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ, ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΠ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 85,7, 87,3, 86,8% ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ. ΠΡΠΈ ΠΠΠ‘Π ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΠ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 96,8% (Ρ < 0,001), 93,3% (Ρ = 0,015), 94,5% (Ρ < 0,001) ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ. ΠΠΠ‘Π ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π°ΡΡ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² β 88,7% (Ρ = 0,012) ΠΈ 98,1% (Ρ < 0,001), ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΠ β 78,6 ΠΈ 91,9% ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ. Π£ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΠ ΠΈ ΠΠΠ‘Π Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠΌΡ Ρ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½ Ρ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΠ, Π½ΠΎ Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΠΠ‘Π Π±ΡΠ»Π° Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π² Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π ΠΠ.ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ, Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΠΠ‘Π Π² Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ
Echinococcosis: diagnosis and current treatment options
Echinococcosis also remains a serious problem today. Highly informative diagnostic methods allow hepatic echinococcosis to be diagnosed at its early stage. This brings mini-invasive, saving operations under ultrasound, X-ray, TV, and endoscopic guidance up to a new level. The accumulated experience suggests that the current high-tech operations that are an alternative to traditional access surgery can be extensively used. However, only strict observance of a protocol for saving operations, their performance in specialized hospitals, and compulsory antiparasitic therapy with albendazole will be of benefit to mini-invasive surgery for hepatic echinococcosis
Embolisation of Type I Endolic after the Endoprosthesis Replacement of the Infrarenal Aorta. Case Report
Introduction. According to the national clinical recommendations, endovascular intervention should be used in the case of infrarenal aneurysm of aorta or common iliac artery in patients with high risk of cardiopulmonary complications during open surgery or serious concurrent conditions. However, despite the reduced risk of minimal invasive intervention, the likelihood of complications remains: the most common of these is endoleak. Type I endoleak is caused by stent graft failure in the area of proximal or distal fixation, leading to an increase of pressure inside the aneurysmal pouch, which can cause it to rupture. In this clinical case, the cause of the endoleak was the short neck of the aneurysm with severe angulation. Leakages of this type must be eliminated by means of a retentive intraluminal cuff or by open surgery. However, the emergency of open surgical intervention in patients with baseline organ dysfunction increases the frequency of complications, often neutralising the advantages of the original endovascular intervention.Materials and methods. The clinical case example demonstrates the effectiveness of embolisation of the endoleak area in a patient with severe cardiac pathology as an alternative to open surgery.Results and discussion. Following elective endovascular implantation of the prosthesis on the control, angiograms are determined by endoleak type I in the area of proximal fixation of endoprosthesis. This is presumably due to incomplete adhesion of endoprosthesis body in the area of the right renal artery. The decision was taken to embolise the zone of leakage. Using a 190.0 cm Abbott Whisper MS 0.014 guide-wire, an Ev3 Rebar-18 2.4F/2.7F. microcatheter was pulled across the area of leakage into the aneurysmatic pouch. An Onyx 18Β β 1.5 ml liquid embolic system was pulled through a microcatheter to the area of leakage. Control angiographyΒ β embolisation was found to be sufficient. There were no signs of non-target embolisation.Conclusion. If a surgeon is sufficiently experienced and technically capable, type I endoleak embolisation can become a method of choice in the treatment of patients with high-risk open surgery
Endovascular Treatment of Mesenteric Ischaemia
Chronic mesenteric ischaemia constitutes a condition characterised by a decreased abdominal blood flow, which is caused by the obstruction of visceral arteries. This short communication paper presents a clinical case of endovascular treatment in a patient with the obstruction of the celiac trunk, superior and inferior mesenteric arteries. Intestinal blood supply was provided through collaterals from the system of internal iliac veins via the inferior mesenteric artery, the arc of Riolan. This clinical case confirmed that percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of the visceral arteries is the method of choice in the surgical treatment of abdominal angina