3 research outputs found
ΠΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ
Vladimir Putin, the President of the Russian Federation, signed the decree on January 5, 2016, declaring Ecology Year to be held in 2017 in Russia. This decree aims at drawing attention to the significance of environmental problems, and improving the situation with environmental security in the country. Our article considers the development of scientific research exploring the interrelations and interdependencies between population and environment, theoretical approaches and methodology of these studies. On the scientific and practical side the article analyses the available typologies of demoecological situations and develops own demoecological typology as a policy instrument aimed at sustainability in population development and environmental security.In the 70s β 90s of the last century, the scientific community paid close attention to the βenvironmental issueβ problem, and there existed the awareness of the interdependence between environment and population. The study on population-environment interdependence was conducted in the Center for Population Studies at the Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University within the framework of new field of the system of population knowledge β ecology of population, considering the demographic and environmental development in close connection. Multiple demoecological situations identified in the studies, were logically followed by the development of the typology of demoecological systems using environmental principles (stage development, diversity and territorial differentiation). The unification of all economic regions of the Soviet Union according to various demoecological factors allowed the authors to summarize all diverse situations, showing similarities in their development, and to highlight the types of interactions between the elements of demoecological regional systems that can be considered to be the basis of comprehensive long-term program of population development. In the late 90-s, this approach, using ranking and indexing methodology was applied to assess the level of demoecological development of the Russian Federation regions. It was resulted in the creation of the specified and amended (in relation to the study conducted in the beginning of 1980s) system of basic indexes in order to monitor changes in demoecological systems, and new, integrated indexes, more accurately characterizing the state of the environment and population development.The research, made in this period, has led to resulting conclusion about the scientific and practical feasibility to take into consideration the typological features of the region while developing long-term programs for sustainable socio-economic development. The similarity of the same demoecological situations allows using the experience of the regions belonging to the same type, reducing the risk of errors in setting the objectives of development programs and the development of measures for their implementation. This conclusion, made 25 years ago, is very relevant today, when a growing number of experts argues that replication of methods of implementation of regional policy is common thing for all the regions of the Russian Federation and has a negative impact on the unity of economic space of the country.Β 5 ΡΠ½Π²Π°ΡΡ 2016 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½Ρ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡ ΠΡΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π» ΡΠΊΠ°Π·, Π² ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΌ 2017 Π³ΠΎΠ΄ Π² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π±ΡΠ» ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ β ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π»Π΅ΡΡ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠΌ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌ, ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π² ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅, ΠΈ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π±Π΅Π·ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ β ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠΆΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ, ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π² ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡ Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ Π±Π΅Π·ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ.ΠΡΠ΅ Π² 70-Π΅ β 90-Π΅ Π³ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ²ΡΡΡ Π½Π°Π·Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Β«ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠΆΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΒ», ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠΆΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΈ Π² Π¦Π΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΠΠ£ Π² ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ β ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ². ΠΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π² Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΎ ΠΊ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² (ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ). Π‘Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π±Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΉΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ² Π‘Π‘Π‘Π ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠ°ΠΌ Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΡΡ Π²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π² ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ, ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΈΠΏΡ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ³Π»ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ, ΠΏΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΌΡΡΠ»Ρ ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡ
, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³ΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ. ΠΠΎΠ·Π΄Π½Π΅Π΅, Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ 1990-Ρ
Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊ ΡΠ°Π½Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΊ, Π±ΡΠ» ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ°Π»Π° ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ (ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π° 1980-Ρ
Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ²) ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ
, Π²ΡΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅, ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ, Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠΆΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ.ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π»Π΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ ΠΊ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³ΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ. Π‘Ρ
ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΆΠ΅ Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ², ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠΈΠΏΡ, ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠΈΡΠΊ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠΎΡ, ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ 25 Π»Π΅Ρ Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄, Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΌΠ° Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»Π΅Π½ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° Π²ΡΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΡΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΡ
Π΄Π»Ρ Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² Π Π€ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π½Π΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π° Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ.
Ecological direction in the system of knowledge on population
Vladimir Putin, the President of the Russian Federation, signed the decree on January 5, 2016, declaring Ecology Year to be held in 2017 in Russia. This decree aims at drawing attention to the significance of environmental problems, and improving the situation with environmental security in the country. Our article considers the development of scientific research exploring the interrelations and interdependencies between population and environment, theoretical approaches and methodology of these studies. On the scientific and practical side the article analyses the available typologies of demoecological situations and develops own demoecological typology as a policy instrument aimed at sustainability in population development and environmental security.In the 70s β 90s of the last century, the scientific community paid close attention to the βenvironmental issueβ problem, and there existed the awareness of the interdependence between environment and population. The study on population-environment interdependence was conducted in the Center for Population Studies at the Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University within the framework of new field of the system of population knowledge β ecology of population, considering the demographic and environmental development in close connection. Multiple demoecological situations identified in the studies, were logically followed by the development of the typology of demoecological systems using environmental principles (stage development, diversity and territorial differentiation). The unification of all economic regions of the Soviet Union according to various demoecological factors allowed the authors to summarize all diverse situations, showing similarities in their development, and to highlight the types of interactions between the elements of demoecological regional systems that can be considered to be the basis of comprehensive long-term program of population development. In the late 90-s, this approach, using ranking and indexing methodology was applied to assess the level of demoecological development of the Russian Federation regions. It was resulted in the creation of the specified and amended (in relation to the study conducted in the beginning of 1980s) system of basic indexes in order to monitor changes in demoecological systems, and new, integrated indexes, more accurately characterizing the state of the environment and population development.The research, made in this period, has led to resulting conclusion about the scientific and practical feasibility to take into consideration the typological features of the region while developing long-term programs for sustainable socio-economic development. The similarity of the same demoecological situations allows using the experience of the regions belonging to the same type, reducing the risk of errors in setting the objectives of development programs and the development of measures for their implementation. This conclusion, made 25 years ago, is very relevant today, when a growing number of experts argues that replication of methods of implementation of regional policy is common thing for all the regions of the Russian Federation and has a negative impact on the unity of economic space of the country