Biodegradable versus titanium osteosynthesis in maxillofacial traumatology:A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Titanium osteosynthesis is currently the fixation system of choice in maxillofacial traumatology. Biodegradable osteosynthesis systems have the ability to degrade in the human body. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review, with meta- and trial sequential analyses, to assess the efficacy and morbidity of biodegradable versus titanium osteosynthesis after maxillofacial trauma. MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for randomized controlled trials and prospective and retrospective controlled studies. Five time periods were studied: perioperative, short-term (0-4 weeks), intermediate (6-12 weeks), long-term (>12 weeks), and overall follow-up. After screening 3542 records, 24 were included. All had a high risk of performance and detection bias due to the nature of the interventions. Meta-analysis showed no differences in efficacy or morbidity between biodegradable and titanium osteosynthesis. The risk of perioperative screw breakage was significantly higher (risk ratio 17.13, 95% confidence interval 2.19-34.18) and the symptomatic plate removal rate lower in the biodegradable group (risk ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.57), which was confirmed by the trial sequential analysis. The quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Based on the narrative review and meta-analyses, current evidence shows that biodegradable osteosynthesis is a viable alternative to titanium osteosynthesis when applied in the treatment of maxillofacial trauma, with similar efficacy but significantly lower symptomatic plate removal rates. Perioperative screw breakage occurred significantly more often in the biodegradable group compared to the titanium group

Arthrocentesis versus non-surgical intervention as initial treatment for temporomandibular joint arthralgia:a randomized controlled trial with long-term follow-up

Arthrocentesis for arthralgia of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is often only indicated when conservative, non-surgical interventions have failed. However, performing arthrocentesis as initial therapy may facilitate earlier and better recuperation of the joint. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of this therapy with a long-term follow-up. Eighty-four patients were randomly allocated to receive either arthrocentesis as initial treatment (n = 41) or non-surgical intervention (n = 43). Pain (100-mm visual analogue scale, VAS) and mandibular function impairment questionnaire scores (MFIQ, 0–100) were recorded at 3, 12, and 26 weeks, and ≥ 5 years (median 6.2, interquartile range 5.6–7.4 years). Univariable analyses were performed and linear mixed-effect models were constructed. Patients in the arthrocentesis group experienced significantly lower TMJ arthralgia compared to those treated non-surgically (pain during movement: −10.23 mm (95% confidence interval −17.86; −2.60); pain at rest: − 8.39 mm (95% confidence interval −13.70; −3.08)), while mandibular function remained similar in the two groups (MFIQ −2.41 (95% confidence interval −8.61; 3.78)). Of the final sample, 10 patients (10/39, 26%) in the non-surgical intervention group and two patients (2/34, 6%) in the arthrocentesis group received additional treatment during follow-up. Thus, initial treatment with arthrocentesis reduced TMJ arthralgia more efficaciously than non-surgical intervention in the long term, while maintaining similar mandibular function

Comparison of the long-term clinical performance of a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system in maxillofacial surgery:A multicenter randomized controlled trial

Background Biodegradable fixation systems could reduce or eliminate problems associated with titanium removal of implants in a second operation. Aim The aim of this study was to compare the long-term (i.e. >5 years postoperatively) clinical performance of a titanium and a biodegradable system in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Materials and methods The present multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) was performed in four hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients treated with a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and/or a Le Fort-I osteotomy, and those treated for fractures of the mandible, maxilla, or zygoma were included from December 2006 to July 2009. The patients were randomly assigned to either a titanium (KLS Martin) or a biodegradable group (Inion CPS). Results After >5 years postoperatively, plate removal was performed in 22 of the 134 (16.4%) patients treated with titanium and in 23 of the 87 (26.4%) patients treated with the biodegradable system (P = 0.036, hazard ratio (HR) biodegradable (95% CI) = 2.0 (1.05-3.8), HR titanium = 1). Occlusion, VAS pain scores, and MFIQ showed good and (almost) pain free mandibular function in both groups. Conclusion In conclusion, the performance of the Inion CPS biodegradable system was inferior compared to the KLS Martin titanium system regarding plate/screws removal in the abovementioned surgical procedures

Accuracy of fit analysis of the patient-specific Groningen temporomandibular joint prosthesis

Total joint replacement (TJR) with a prosthesis can be indicated for patients with severe temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction. Surgical accuracy is necessary for correct translation of the preoperatively predicted functional outcome, wear, and biomechanical behaviour of the patient-specific TMJ-TJR prosthesis. This study describes the first clinical applications of the patient-specific TMJ-TJR prosthesis according to the Groningen principles (G-TMJ-TJR), which was developed and validated in a prior human cadaver test study. The aim of this study was to validate the accuracy of placement of the patient-specific G-TMJ-TJR in the clinical setting. It was hypothesized that a virtual surgical plan (VSP) combined with guided placement of the patient-specific G-TMJ-TJR would be performed as predictably and accurately as in the prior cadaver series. All patients who received a VSP-based patient-specific G-TMJ-TJR between December 2017 and March 2020 were included in this study. The accuracy analysis was based on postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data. All 11 prostheses could be inserted using routine pre-auricular and retromandibular surgical approaches. Analysis of the VSPs and postoperative CBCTs showed an average three-dimensional deviation of 1.07 mm (standard deviation 0.46 mm, range 0.33?1.91 mm) for all of the fossa and mandibular components. The patient-specific G-TMJ-TJR can be applied predictably and accurately in a clinical setting

Arthrocentesis versus non-surgical intervention as initial treatment for temporomandibular joint arthralgia: a randomized controlled trial with long-term follow-up

Arthrocentesis for arthralgia of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is often only indicated when conservative, non-surgical interventions have failed. However, performing arthrocentesis as initial therapy may facilitate earlier and better recuperation of the joint. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of this therapy with a long-term follow-up. Eighty-four patients were randomly allocated to receive either arthrocentesis as initial treatment (n = 41) or non-surgical intervention (n = 43). Pain (100-mm visual analogue scale, VAS) and mandibular function impairment questionnaire scores (MFIQ, 0–100) were recorded at 3, 12, and 26 weeks, and ≥ 5 years (median 6.2, interquartile range 5.6–7.4 years). Univariable analyses were performed and linear mixed-effect models were constructed. Patients in the arthrocentesis group experienced significantly lower TMJ arthralgia compared to those treated non-surgically (pain during movement: −10.23 mm (95% confidence interval −17.86; −2.60); pain at rest: − 8.39 mm (95% confidence interval −13.70; −3.08)), while mandibular function remained similar in the two groups (MFIQ −2.41 (95% confidence interval −8.61; 3.78)). Of the final sample, 10 patients (10/39, 26%) in the non-surgical intervention group and two patients (2/34, 6%) in the arthrocentesis group received additional treatment during follow-up. Thus, initial treatment with arthrocentesis reduced TMJ arthralgia more efficaciously than non-surgical intervention in the long term, while maintaining similar mandibular function

Comparison of the long-term skeletal stability between a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system following BSSO advancement - A cohort study based on a multicenter randomised controlled trial

Biodegradable fixation systems could reduce or eliminate the problems associated with removal of titanium plates. A multicenter randomised controlled trial (RCT) was performed in the Netherlands from December 2006-July 2009, and originally 230 injured and orthognathic patients were included. The patients were randomly assigned to either a titanium control group (KLS Martin) or to a biodegradable test group (Inion CPS). The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term skeletal stability of advancement bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) of a biodegradable system and a titanium system. Only patients from the original RCT who were at least 18 years old and who had a BSSO advancement osteotomy were included. Those who had simultaneous Le Fort I osteotomy or genioplasty were excluded. Analysis of skeletal stability was made by digital tracing of lateral cephalograms. Long-term skeletal stability in BSSO advancement did not differ significantly between patients treated with biodegradable plates and screws and those treated with titanium plates and screws. Given the comparable amount of relapse, the general use of Inion CPS in the treatment of BSSO advancement should not be discouraged. On the basis of other properties a total picture of the clinical use can be obtained; the short-term stability, the intraoperative switches, the number of plates removed and cost-effectiveness. Trial registration of original RCT: http://www.controlled-trials.com; ISRCTN 44212338. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

Decision-making considerations in application of biodegradable fixation systems in maxillofacial surgery - A retrospective cohort study

In a recent RCT comparing biodegradable Onion CPS) with titanium (KLS Martin) plates and screws for fixation of osteotomies or fractures, we found that in 21% of the cases the surgeon decided intraoperatively to switch from biodegradable to titanium.. The aim of the current retrospective cohort study was to analyse the reasons for these switches in order to find predictor variables that may be helpful in the decision to use biodegradable devices or not. The surgeons' opinion about the biodegradable system, and if there was a learning curve in the application of the biodegradable system were also investigated. All variables were assessed during the original RCT by using a questionnaire that was completed by the OMF surgeon directly post-operatively. For the outcome variable "surgeons' opinion" a separate questionnaire was used. Regarding the predictor variables a mandibular fracture had a higher risk of switching compared to a BSSO. However, looking at the reasons for these switches no firm conclusions can be drawn. There was a subjective learning curve to acquire the application-skills for the biodegradable system. There were no changes in isolated Le-Fort-I osteotomies despite the fact that the biodegradable system seems more difficult to apply in the midface. Inadequate stability Was the main reason for switching. This can be material-related, or related to inexperience with or lack of confidence in the system, or impatience of the surgeon. A learning curve and personal preferences probably play an important role in the decision to switch. We think that with more patience and more experience it should be possible to increase both user comfort and confidence in the biodegradable system of Inion CPS, which likely will decrease the number of intra-operative switches. (C) 2013 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Comparison of Biodegradable and Titanium Fixation Systems in Maxillofacial Surgery:A Two-year Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial

Biodegradable osteosynthesis could reduce/delete the problems associated with titanium plate removal. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical performance in the first 2 post-operative years between a biodegradable and a titanium system in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed in the Netherlands from December 2006 to July 2009. Included were 230 patients who underwent a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and/or a Le Fort-I osteotomy and those treated for fractures of the mandible, maxilla, or zygoma. The patients were randomly assigned to a titanium group (KLS Martin) or to a biodegradable group (Inion CPS). Plate removal was necessary in 16 of the 134 patients (11.9%) treated with titanium and in 21 of the 87 patients (24.1%) treated with the biodegradable system within the first 2 post-operative years [p = .016, HR biodegradable (95% CI) = 2.2 (1.1-4.2), HR titanium = 1]. Occlusion, VAS, and MFIQ scores showed that both groups had good mandibular function and were (almost) free of pain 1 and 2 years post-operatively (http://controlled-trials.com ISRCTN 44212338)

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Biodegradable and Titanium Fixation Systems in Maxillofacial Surgery

Biodegradable fixation systems could reduce or delete the problems associated with metallic systems, since removal is not necessary. The aim of this study was to establish the effectiveness and safety of biodegradable plates and screws as potential alternatives to metallic ones. This multi-center randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 2006 to July 2009. Included were patients who underwent mandibular and/or Le Fort I osteotomies and those with fractures of the mandible, maxilla, and zygoma. The patients were assigned to a titanium control group (KLS Martin) or to a biodegradable test group (Inion CPS). The primary outcome measure was 'bone healing 8 weeks post-operatively'. The Intention-To-Treat (ITT) analysis of 113 patients in the titanium group and 117 patients in the biodegradable group yielded a significant difference (p <0.001), primarily because in 25 patients (21%) who were randomized to the biodegradable group, the surgeon made the decision to switch to titanium intra-operatively. Despite this 'inferior' primary outcome result, biodegradable plates and screws could be safely used when it was possible to apply them. The benefits of using biodegradable systems (fewer plate removal operations) should be confirmed during a follow-up of minimally 5 years (Controlled-trials.com ISRCTN number 44212338)