"Twinning procedure" in lung transplantation: influence of graft ischemia on survival and incidence of complication

Abstract The limited number of suitable lung donors is the major obstacle to clinical application of lung transplantation. The "twinning procedure" may represent one strategy to optimize the use of the small pool of available grafts. From November 1991 to May 2003, 99 single lung transplants (SLTx) were performed including 46 (46%) cases of the "twinning procedure." We divided the study population into two groups: group A (recipients of the "first" lung) and group B (recipients of the "second" lung). The ischemia time was significantly different (A: 216 +/- 48 minutes, B: 310 +/- 89 minutes, P <.001). Differences were not observed in the incidence of graft failure (A: 2, B: 0, P = NS), in the length of mechanical ventilation (A: 12.8 +/- 29.4 days, B: 7.8 +/- 15.2 days, P = NS), or ICU stay (A: 18.8 +/- 50.6 days, B: 15.2 +/- 17.1 days, P = NS), or of hospitalization (A: 37.8 +/- 56.8 days, B: 31.4 +/- 31.7 days, P = NS). Three bronchial anastomotic complications occurred in each group. The incidence of infections (A: 0.015 events/patient/month, B: 0.011 events/patient/month, P = NS) and of treated acute rejections (A: 0.011 events/patient/month, B: 0.011 events/patient/month, P = NS) was similar in the two groups. One-year survival rates were 86% +/- 7% and 72% +/- 10% in group A and B patients, respectively (P = NS). In our experience the different ischemia times related to the twinning procedure did not increase the mortality or morbidity in the early and midterm perio

Endovascular treatment of aberrant right subclavian (lusorian) artery to oesophagus fistula: A case report

The creation of a fistula between the subclavian artery and the oesophagus is extremely rare. All the reported cases of subclavian oesophagus-arterial fistulae have been described either in aberrant subclavian arteries or as caused by foreign bodies in the oesophagus. In this article, a case of fistulous communication between an aberrant right subclavian and the oesophagus managed with the positioning of endovascular prosthesis is presented. \ua9 2008 SAGE Publications

Orthotopic heart transplantation: standard versus bicaval tecnique.

Abstract: We compared orthotopic heart transplantation (HT) by bicaval technique with the standard technique. Between January 1995 and December 1997, 117 patients underwent 118 HTs; 71 patients (15 women and 56 men) had 72 HTs by standard technique and 46 patients (9 women, 37 men) underwent HT using bicaval procedures. Preoperative parameters were similar in both groups; 5 patients who underwent the standard technique and no patients who underwent bicaval procedures required permanent pacemakers (p = NS). Isoproterenol infusion was significantly longer in the standard technique. Major perioperative arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, asystole) appeared in 8.2% and 7.0% of standard and bicaval HTs, respectively; atrial fibrillation appeared in 13.1% and 4.6%, respectively (p = NS). At 1 month, mitral and tricuspid regurgitation rates were higher in the standard group (p = NS); at 1 year only tricuspid regurgitation was still higher (p = NS). Right atrial pressure, Wood units, cardiac output, and cardiac index were examined (p = NS). At multivariate analysis, interaction between preoperative Wood units and transplant type was elicited for Wood units at 1 month and for right atrial pressure at 1, 3, and 6 months. In the high resistance subgroup, the patients who underwent bicaval procedures had higher resistances at 1 month. In the low resistance subgroup, right atrial pressure was higher in patients who underwent standard techniques at 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up. Thus, bicaval HT was found to be safe, without surgically related complications, it provoked significantly less blood loss, and required less isoproterenol use. No significant advantages were observed in conduction disturbances and major arrhythmias or regarding the need for temporary or permanent pacemakers. (C) 2000 by Excerpta Medica, Inc

Transapical aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Transapical aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI) represents an alternative in patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis (SSAVS) who cannot be operated on or have a high surgical risk. The aim of this prospective multicenter observational study was to assess early and 2-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after TA-TAVI. METHODS: From May 2008 to September 2010, 179 patients with inoperable conditions or high-risk patients underwent TA-TAVI at 4 institutions. Indications for TA-TAVI were SSAVS and logistic EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) greater than 20% or porcelain aorta in patients with severe aortoiliac disease. Patients underwent clinical and echocardiographic follow-up visits at hospital discharge, 3 and 6 months after TA-TAVI, and every 6 months thereafter. The impact of the learning curve for the centers and of intraoperative complications on patient outcomes was also evaluated. RESULTS: Mean age was 81 \ub1 6 years. Mean logistic EuroSCORE was 22% \ub1 12%. Transapical delivery was successful in all patients. Seventeen severe intraoperative complications occurred in 13 (7.3%) patients. Thirty-day mortality was 3.9% (7 patients). Mean follow-up was 9.2 \ub1 6.5 months. Late mortality occurred in 9 patients. Two-year survival was 88% \ub1 3%. An intraoperative severe complication was identified as the only significant independent predictor of 1-year mortality. A significant benefit was found when comparing 2-year survival of the second versus the first 50% patients at each center (93% \ub1 2% versus 84% \ub1 3 %; p = 0.046). A significant reduction of both mean and peak gradients from the preoperative to the postoperative period, which remained stable during follow-up, was found. CONCLUSIONS: TA-TAVI provides excellent early and 2-year results in terms of survival, valve-related adverse events, and hemodynamic performance. Survival after TA-TAVI is affected by the center learning curve and by the occurrence of an intraoperative complication