The 'help' question doesn't help when screening for major depression: external validation of the three-question screening test for primary care patients managed for physical complaints

Major depression, although frequent in primary care, is commonly hidden behind multiple physical complaints that are often the first and only reason for patient consultation. Major depression can be screened by two validated questions that are easier to use in primary care than the full Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) criteria. A third question, called the 'help' question, improves the specificity without apparently decreasing the sensitivity of this screening procedure. We validated the abbreviated screening procedure for major depression with and without the 'help' question in primary care patients managed for a physical complaint. This diagnostic accuracy study used data from the SODA (for 'SOmatisation Depression Anxiety') cohort study conducted by 24 general practitioners (GPs) in western Switzerland that included patients over 18 years of age with at least a single physical complaint at index consultation. Major depression was identified with the full Patient Health Questionnaire. GPs were asked to screen patients for major depression with the three screening questions 1 year after inclusion. Of 937 patients with at least a single physical complaint, 751 were eligible 1 year after index consultation. Major depression was diagnosed in 69/724 (9.5%) patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the two-question method alone were 91.3% (95% CI 81.4 to 96.4) and 65.0% (95% CI 61.2 to 68.6), respectively. Adding the 'help' question decreased the sensitivity (59.4%; 95% CI 47.0 to 70.9) but improved the specificity (88.2%; 95% CI 85.4 to 90.5) of the three-question method. The use of two screening questions for major depression was associated with high sensitivity and low specificity in primary care patients presenting a physical complaint. Adding the 'help' question improved the specificity but clearly decreased the sensitivity; when using the 'help' question, four out of ten patients with depression will be missed, compared to only one out of ten with the two-question method. Therefore, the 'help' question is not useful as a screening question, but may help discussing management strategies

Psychosocial stressors and depression at a Swedish primary health care centre. A gender perspective study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Psychosocial stress may account for the higher prevalence of depression in women and in individuals with a low educational background. The aim of this study was to analyse the association between depression and socio-demographic data, psychosocial stressors and lifestyle circumstances from a gender perspective in a relatively affluent primary care setting.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients, aged 18- 75 years, visiting a drop-in clinic at a primary care health centre were screened with Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI). The physicians used also targeted screening with BDI. A questionnaire on socio-demographic data, psychosocial stressors and use of alcohol and tobacco was distributed. Among patients, who scored BDI ≥10, DSM-IV-criteria were used to diagnose depression. Of the 404 participants, 48 men and 76 women were diagnosed with depression. The reference group consisted of patients with BDI score <10, 187 men and 93 women. Age-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) as being depressed were calculated for the psychosocial stressors and lifestyle circumstances, separately for men and women. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to determine the age-adjusted main effect models for men and women.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The same three psychosocial stressors: feeling very stressed, perceived poor physical health and being dissatisfied with one's family situation were associated with depression equally in men and women. The negative predictive values of the main effect models in men and women were 90.7% and 76.5%, respectively. Being dissatisfied with one's work situation had high ORs in both men and women. Unemployment and smoking were associated with depression in men only.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Three questions, frequently asked by physicians, which involve patient's family and working situation as well as perceived stress and physical health, could be used as depression indicators in early detection of depression in men and women in primary health care.</p

Patients presenting with somatic complaints in general practice : dépression, anxiety and somatoform disorders are frequent and associated with psychosocial stressors

RAPPORT DE SYNTHÈSE Introduction En médecine de premier recours, les plaintes physiques sont fréquemment associées à des troubles dépressifs, anxieux et somatoformes et peuvent les masquer. Il est fréquemment reporté que ces troubles mentaux ont tendance à être insuffisamment diagnostiqués. Par ailleurs, peu d'études ont été conduites en médecine de premier recours concernant la possible association entre facteurs de stress psychosociaux et troubles dépressifs, anxieux et somatoformes. Objectifs Les objectifs étaient de déterminer la prévalence des troubles dépressifs, anxieux et somatoformes chez des patients consultant avec une plainte physique en médecine de premier recours, ainsi que d'explorer la possible association entre ces troubles mentaux et des facteurs de stress psychosociaux. Méthodes Nous avons conduit une étude transversale, multicentrique parmi vingt et un cabinets médicaux en Suisse Romande et la Policlinique Médicale Universitaire de Lausanne. Les sujets étaient sélectionnés aléatoirement parmi des patients qui avaient présenté spontanément au moins une plainte physique et qui avaient consulté lors d'une demi- journée de consultation considérée pour l'étude. Les patients inclus ont rempli l'auto- questionnaire Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) entre novembre 2004 et juillet 2005. Nous avons utilisé la version française et validée du PHQ qui permet le diagnostic des principaux troubles mentaux selon les critères du DSM-IV et l'analyse de l'exposition aux facteurs de stress psychosociaux. Résultats Neuf cent dix-sept patients se présentant avec au moins une plainte physique ont été inclus. Le taux de troubles dépressifs, anxieux et somatoformes a été de 20,0% (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95% = 17,4%-22,7%), 15,5% (IC 95% = 13,2%- 18,0%) et 15,1% (IC 95% = 12,8%~17,5%), respectivement. Les facteurs de stress psychosociaux ont été significativement associés aux troubles mentaux. Les patients avec une accumulation de facteurs de stress psychosociaux ont été le plus souvent déprimés, anxieux ou ont manifesté des troubles somatoformes, avec une augmentation par un facteur 2,2 (IC 95% = 2,0-2,5) pour chaque facteur additionnel. Conclusions Bien que la relation entre facteurs de stress psychosociaux et trouble dépressif soit bien établie, cette étude montre qu'il existe un lien entre ces facteurs de stress et les troubles dépressifs, anxieux et somatoformes. L'investigation de ces troubles mentaux chez des patients consultant avec un symptôme physique en médecine de premier recours est pertinente. D'autres explorations sont nécessaires pour investiguer le bénéfice potentiel d'une prise en charge intégrée des facteurs de stress psychosociaux sur la diminution des plaintes physiques et des troubles mentaux chez les patients que suivent les médecins de premier recours

Development of mental disorders one year after exposure to psychosocial stressors; a cohort study in primary care patients with a physical complaint.

BACKGROUND: Mental disorders, common in primary care, are often associated with physical complaints. While exposure to psychosocial stressors and development or presence of principal mental disorders (i.e. depression, anxiety and somatoform disorders defined as multisomatoforme disorders) is commonly correlated, temporal association remains unproven. The study explores the onset of such disorders after exposure to psychosocial stressors in a cohort of primary care patients with at least one physical symptom. METHOD: The cohort study SODA (SOmatization, Depression and Anxiety) was conducted by 21 private-practice GPs and three fellow physicians in a Swiss academic primary care centre. GPs included patients via randomized daily identifiers. Depression, anxiety or somatoform disorders were identified by the full Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), a validated procedure to identify mental disorders based on DSM-IV criteria. The PHQ was also used to investigate exposure to psychosocial stressors (before the index consultation and during follow up) and the onset of principal mental disorders after one year of follow up. RESULTS: From November 2004 to July 2005, 1020 patients were screened for inclusion. 627 were eligible and 482 completed the PHQ one year later and were included in the analysis (77%). At one year, prevalence of principal mental disorders was 30/153 (19.6% CI95% 13.6; 26.8) for those initially exposed to a major psychosocial stressor and 26/329 (7.9% CI95% 5.2; 11.4) for those not. Stronger association exists between psychosocial stressors and depression (RR = 2.4) or anxiety (RR = 3.5) than multisomatoforme disorders (RR = 1.8). Patients who are "bothered a lot" (subjective distress) by a stressor are therefore 2.5 times (CI95% 1.5; 4.0) more likely to experience a mental disorder at one year. A history of psychiatric comorbidities or psychological treatment was not a confounding factor for developing a principal mental disorder after exposure to psychosocial stressors. CONCLUSION: This primary care study shows that patients with physical complaints exposed to psychosocial stressors had a higher risk for developing mental disorders one year later. This temporal association opens the field for further research in preventive care for mental diseases in primary care patients

Des céphalées, cinq avis spécialisés: les pièges diagnostiques pour la maladie de Horton [Headaches, five expert opinions: the pitfalls involved in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis].

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) (or Horton's disease) is a systemic disease affecting the vessels of medium and large sizes. The incidence increases with age (the disease develops rarely before age 50) and the etiology remains unknown. Clinical manifestations may vary (including asthenia, temporal headache, visual disturbances, etc.) and GCA can potentially lead to dramatic consequences (permanent loss of vision). Although some anomalies in the investigations may help in the diagnosis of GCA, research and confirmation of the diagnosis of GCA may be difficult, especially when the symptoms presented by patients are spread out in time and appear to be nonspecific at first

Incontinence urinaire chez la femme âgée: que faire au cabinet? [Urinary incontinence in older women: what can a GP do?]

Urinary incontinence (UI) is frequent in older women but remains often neglected when they consult their physician. It is associated with numerous health and social consequences that impact on these older persons' quality of life, as well as on their health care costs. Primary care physicians should become more familiar with this frequent condition. A clinical pathway is proposed to guide them in diagnosing and managing of this debilitating condition

Self-reported rather than registered cancer is associated with psychosocial strain

BACKGROUND: Individuals with only a subjective experience of cancer may conceal severe psychological distress and act like patients with verified disease. The purpose of the study was to establish whether some typical psychosocial factors may be linked to subjects with registered cancer (confirmed) and also to those with self-reported cancer lacking accompanying registered data (non-confirmed). METHODS: The material comprised 25 898 working-aged individuals (response rate 40.0%) in 1998. Of these 19 629 also responded at the follow-up in 2003 (response rate 75.8%). The analyses focused on respondents with cancer diagnosis in 2002 or earlier according to data of the Finnish Cancer Registry and self-report of cancer in 2003 (confirmed) (N=330) and on respondents with self-reported cancer only but lacking registered diagnosis (non-confirmed) (N=140). Those who neither reported cancer nor had a diagnosis were included as a control group (N= 18 299). RESULTS: Respondents with confirmed cancer belonged more often to the oldest age-group than those with non-confirmed cancer. Respondents with non-confirmed cancer were more often obese, depressed and reported less social support compared to subjects with confirmed cancer. Compared to controls they had a statistically significantly increased risk of depression, lower optimism, lower life satisfaction, more childhood adversities, more negative life events and less social support. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with only a subjective experience of cancer reported more psychosocial strain than those with accompanying registered cancer. Self-report of a severe disease like cancer without corresponding clinical findings might reflect heavy psychological distress which should be taken into consideration in clinical work