4 research outputs found

    Design and Performance Evaluation of a Hydronic Type Compost Heat Exchanger

    No full text
    While much research has been published on the Compost Heat Recovery Systems (CHRs), little has been documented on the design and performance evaluation of the Hydronic compost heat exchangers using numerical and computational methods, occasionally resulting in compost process inhibition. A CHRs (0.036 m3/7.2 m2) Hydronic-type heat exchanger and 12.43 m2/2.83 m3, compost reactor (CR), was designed and developed with the main objective of evaluating the design and its performance. The numerical design and performance evaluation was achieved by using Kern’s and the effectiveness and Number of Transfer Units methods (ε-NTU), respectively. Empirically, data were captured by using the Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) thermocouples connected to the TC-8 Picolog Data loggers. Data validation (empirical and mathematical), was achieved by modifying a free computer-based software developed by the Chemical Engineering Calculations (CHECAL), into a Hydronic Compost Heat Exchanger design and performance evaluation software (HYDROCOHE). Between the HYDROCOHE and numerical, and between empirical and HYDROCOHE, R2 values of 0.99938–0.9995, and R2 of 0.99269–0.9432 with the effectiveness of 0.4853–0.4848 were achieved with 0.99 kW-empirical and 2.10 kW-HYDROCOHE, respectively. The power disparity may be ascribed to the compost reactor’s insufficient thermal insulation. Counterflow arrangement was more effective (0.4766) than crossflow (0.4622) and parallelflow (0.4430) setups. Parallelflow heat exchanger system, therefore, has the potential to extract heat steadily, minimizing the composting cycle inhibition. Further work on the impact of various flowrates on the direction of flow and heat extraction is recommended

    Industry 4.0 Disruption and Its Neologisms in Major Industrial Sectors: A State of the Art

    No full text
    Very well into the dawn of the fourth industrial revolution (industry 4.0), humankind can hardly distinguish between what is artificial and what is natural (e.g., man-made virus and natural virus). Thus, the level of discombobulation among people, companies, or countries is indeed unprecedented. The fact that industry 4.0 is explosively disrupting or retrofitting each and every industrial sector makes industry 4.0 the famous buzzword amongst researchers today. However, the insight of industry 4.0 disruption into the industrial sectors remains ill-defined in both academic and nonacademic literature. The present study aimed at identifying industry 4.0 neologisms, understanding the industry 4.0 disruption and illustrating the disruptive technology convergence in the major industrial sectors. A total of 99 neologisms of industry 4.0 were identified. Industry 4.0 disruption in the education industry (education 4.0), energy industry (energy 4.0), agriculture industry (agriculture 4.0), healthcare industry (healthcare 4.0), and logistics industry (logistics 4.0) was described. The convergence of 12 disruptive technologies including 3D printing, artificial intelligence, augmented reality, big data, blockchain, cloud computing, drones, Internet of Things, nanotechnology, robotics, simulation, and synthetic biology in agriculture, healthcare, and logistics industries was illustrated. The study divulged the need for extensive research to expand the application areas of the disruptive technologies in the industrial sectors
    corecore