Correction to: The experiences of people with incomplete spinal cord injury or disease during intensive balance training and the impact of the program: A qualitative study (Spinal Cord, (2022), 10.1038/s41393-022-00823-9)

The original version of this article contained a spelling error in an author name. The last name of the corresponding author, Dr. Kristin Musselman, should be corrected from Mussleman to Musselman. The original article has been corrected

Impact of Falls and Fear of Falling on Participation, Autonomy and Life Satisfaction in the First Year After Spinal Cord Injury

IntroductionIndividuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience reduced participation in meaningful activities, leading to reduced social engagement and negative psychological impact. Two factors that may affect participation post-SCI are fall status (e.g., having experienced a fall) and having a fear of falling. Our objective was to examine if and how fall status and fear of falling impact participation, autonomy and life satisfaction in the first year post-injury.MethodsAdult inpatients of a SCI rehabilitation hospital were recruited. Following discharge, falls were tracked for 6 months and participants who fell at least once were categorized as “fallers”. At the end of the 6-month period, the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire and Life Satisfaction Questionnaire 9 were administered, and participants were asked if they had a fear of falling (i.e., an ongoing concern about falling leading to the avoidance of activities they are capable of doing). Falls were reported using descriptive statistics. Ordinary least squares regression was used to evaluate the relationships between the independent variables (i.e., fall status and fear of falling) and each dependent variable (i.e., questionnaire scores).ResultsSeventy-one individuals were enrolled in the study; however, 11 participants were lost to follow-up. The included participants (n = 60) were 58.4 ± 14.6 years old and 99 ± 60.3 days post-injury. Over one third (38.3%) of participants fell over the 6-month tracking period. Twenty-seven participants (45%) reported a fear of falling and 14 (51.9%) of these participants were fallers. Fear of falling significantly predicted scores of autonomy indoors (β = 3.38, p = 0.04), autonomy outdoors (β = 2.62, p = 0.04) and family role (β = 3.52, p = 0.05).ConclusionIndividuals with subacute SCI and a fear of falling experienced reduced participation and autonomy, but with no differences in life satisfaction compared to those without a fear of falling. In contrast, having experienced a fall did not impact participation, autonomy or life satisfaction. In the first year after SCI, rehabilitation programs should place specific attention on the presence of fear of falling to help individuals with SCI prepare for everyday mobility challenges

The measurement properties of the Lean-and-Release test in people with incomplete spinal cord injury or disease

Objective: To evaluate test-retest reliability, agreement, and convergent validity of the Lean-and-Release test for the assessment of reactive stepping among individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury or disease (iSCI/D). Design: Multi-center cross-sectional multiple test design. Setting: SCI/D rehabilitation hospital and biomechanics laboratory. Participants: Individuals with motor incomplete SCI/D (iSCI/D). Interventions: None. Outcome Measures: Twenty-six participants attended two sessions to complete the Lean-and-Release test and a battery of clinical tests. Behavioral (i.e. one-step, multi-step, loss of balance) and temporal (i.e. timing of foot off, foot contact, swing of reactive step) parameters were measured. Test-retest reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficients, and agreement was evaluated with Bland–Altman plots. Convergent validity was assessed through correlations with clinical tests. Results: The behavioral responses were reliable for the Lean-and-Release test (ICC = 0.76), but foot contact was the only reliable temporal parameter using data from a single site (ICC = 0.79). All variables showed agreement according to the Bland–Altman plots. The behavioral responses correlated with scores of lower extremity strength (0.54, P\u3c0.01) and balance confidence (0.55, P \u3c 0.01). Swing time of reactive stepping correlated with step time (0.73, P \u3c 0.01) and cadence (−0.73 P \u3c 0.01) of over ground walking. Conclusions: The behavioral response of the Lean-and-Release test is a reliable and valid measure for people with iSCI/D. Our findings support the use of the behavioral responses to evaluate reactive stepping for research and clinical purposes. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02960178

Multi-Center, Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy to Conventional Therapy in Incomplete Tetraplegia

BACKGROUND: Loss of upper extremity function after tetraplegia results in significant disability. Emerging evidence from pilot studies suggests that functional electrical stimulation (FES) therapy may enhance recovery of upper extremity function after tetraplegia. The aim of this trial was to determine the effectiveness of FES therapy delivered by the Myndmove stimulator in people with tetraplegia. METHODS: A multi-center RESULTS: Between June 2019 to August 2021, 51 participants were randomized to FES ( CONCLUSION: Forty sessions of FES therapy delivered by the MyndMove stimulator are as effective as conventional therapy in producing meaningful functional improvements that persist after therapy is completed. Limitations of this study include the impact of COVID-19 limiting the ability to recruit the target sample size and per-protocol execution of the study in one-third of the participants. REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03439319

Multi-center, single-blind randomized controlled trial comparing functional electrical stimulation therapy to conventional therapy in incomplete tetraplegia

BackgroundLoss of upper extremity function after tetraplegia results in significant disability. Emerging evidence from pilot studies suggests that functional electrical stimulation (FES) therapy may enhance recovery of upper extremity function after tetraplegia. The aim of this trial was to determine the effectiveness of FES therapy delivered by the Myndmove stimulator in people with tetraplegia.MethodsA multi-center, single-blind, parallel-group, two-arm, randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing FES to conventional therapy in adults (≥18 years) with C4–C7 traumatic incomplete tetraplegia between 4 and 96 months post-injury, and with a baseline spinal cord injury independence measure III -self-care (SCIM III-SC) score of ≤10. Participants were enrolled at four SCI-specialized neurorehabilitation centers in the U.S. and Canada. Participants were stratified by center and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 40 sessions of FES or conventional therapy targeting upper extremities over a 14-week period. Blinded assessors measured SCIM III, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Hand Function Test, and Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension at baseline, after 20th session, after 40th session or 14 weeks after 1st session, and at 24 weeks after 1st session. The primary outcome measure was change in SCIM III-SC from baseline to end of the treatment. Based on the primary outcome measure, a sample size of 60 was calculated. Seventeen participants' progress in the study was interrupted due to the COVID-19 lockdown. The protocol was modified for these participants to allow them to complete the study.ResultsBetween June 2019 to August 2021, 51 participants were randomized to FES (n = 27) and conventional therapy (n = 24). Both groups gained a mean of 2 points in SCIM-SC scores at the end of treatment, which was a clinically meaningful change. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups on any outcomes.ConclusionForty sessions of FES therapy delivered by the MyndMove stimulator are as effective as conventional therapy in producing meaningful functional improvements that persist after therapy is completed. Limitations of this study include the impact of COVID-19 limiting the ability to recruit the target sample size and per-protocol execution of the study in one-third of the participants.RegistrationThis trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03439319

Rehabilitation technologies and interventions for individuals with spinal cord injury: translational potential of current trends

Abstract In the past, neurorehabilitation for individuals with neurological damage, such as spinal cord injury (SCI), was focused on learning compensatory movements to regain function. Presently, the focus of neurorehabilitation has shifted to functional neurorecovery, or the restoration of function through repetitive movement training of the affected limbs. Technologies, such as robotic devices and electrical stimulation, are being developed to facilitate repetitive motor training; however, their implementation into mainstream clinical practice has not been realized. In this commentary, we examined how current SCI rehabilitation research aligns with the potential for clinical implementation. We completed an environmental scan of studies in progress that investigate a physical intervention promoting functional neurorecovery. We identified emerging interventions among the SCI population, and evaluated the strengths and gaps of the current direction of SCI rehabilitation research. Seventy-three study postings were retrieved through website and database searching. Study objectives, outcome measures, participant characteristics and the mode(s) of intervention being studied were extracted from the postings. The FAME (Feasibility, Appropriateness, Meaningfulness, Effectiveness, Economic Evidence) Framework was used to evaluate the strengths and gaps of the research with respect to likelihood of clinical implementation. Strengths included aspects of Feasibility, as the research was practical, aspects of Appropriateness as the research aligned with current scientific literature on motor learning, and Effectiveness, as all trials aimed to evaluate the effect of an intervention on a clinical outcome. Aspects of Feasibility were also identified as a gap; with two thirds of the studies examining emerging technologies, the likelihood of successful clinical implementation was questionable. As the interventions being studied may not align with the preferences of clinicians and priorities of patients, the Appropriateness of these interventions for the current health care environment was questioned. Meaningfulness and Economic Evidence were also identified as gaps since few studies included measures reflecting the perceptions of the participants or economic factors, respectively. The identified gaps will likely impede the clinical uptake of many of the interventions currently being studied. Future research may lessen these gaps through a staged approach to the consideration of the FAME elements as novel interventions and technologies are developed, evaluated and implemented

Postural control strategy after incomplete spinal cord injury: effect of sensory inputs on trunk–leg movement coordination

Abstract Background Postural control is affected after incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) due to sensory and motor impairments. Any alteration in the availability of sensory information can challenge postural stability in this population and may lead to a variety of adaptive movement coordination patterns. Hence, identifying the underlying impairments and changes to movement coordination patterns is necessary for effective rehabilitation post-iSCI. This study aims to compare the postural control strategy between iSCI and able-bodied populations by quantifying the trunk–leg movement coordination under conditions that affects sensory information. Methods 13 individuals with iSCI and 14 aged-matched able-bodied individuals performed quiet standing on hard and foam surfaces with eyes open and closed. We used mean Magnitude-Squared Coherence between trunk–leg accelerations measured by accelerometers placed over the sacrum and tibia. Results We observed a similar ankle strategy at lower frequencies (f ≤ 1.0 Hz) between populations. However, we observed a decreased ability post-iSCI in adapting inter-segment coordination changing from ankle strategy to ankle–hip strategy at higher frequencies (f > 1.0 Hz). Moreover, utilizing the ankle–hip strategy at higher frequencies was challenged when somatosensory input was distorted, whereas depriving visual information did not affect balance strategy. Conclusion Trunk–leg movement coordination assessment showed sensitivity, discriminatory ability, and excellent test–retest reliability to identify changes in balance control strategy post-iSCI and due to altered sensory inputs. Trunk–leg movement coordination assessment using wearable sensors can be used for objective outcome evaluation of rehabilitative interventions on postural control post-iSCI