Genetic Enhancement Perspectives and Prospects for Grain Nutrients Density

Diet-induced micronutrient malnutrition continues to be a major challenge globally, especially in the developing world. With the ever-increasing population, it becomes a daunting task to feed millions of mouths with nutritious food. It is time to reorient agricultural systems to produce quality food to supply the calorie and nutrient requirements needed by the human body. Biofortification is the process of improving micronutrients density by genetic means. It is cheaper and sustainable and complements well with the nutrient supplementation and fortification— the short-term strategies that are currently deployed to address the micronutrient malnutrition. Sorghum is one of the important food crops globally, adapted to semi-arid tropics, and there is increased awareness on its nutritional importance. Further, there is great opportunity to improve sorghum for nutritional quality. This chapter deals about the genetic enhancement perspectives and prospects for improving the nutritional quality with main emphasis on grain micronutrient density in sorghum

A Comprehensive Review of MDMA and GHB: Two Common Club Drugs

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90303/1/phco.21.20.1486.34472.pd

A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery

A Correction to this paper has been published (18 October 2023) : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06164-8.Data availability: Tabulated results are provided in the HEPData record for this analysis. Release and preservation of data used by the CMS Collaboration as the basis for publications is guided by the CMS data preservation, re-use and open acess policy.Code availability: The CMS core software is publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw).In July 2012, the ATLAS and CMS collaborations at the CERN Large Hadron Collider announced the observation of a Higgs boson at a mass of around 125 gigaelectronvolts. Ten years later, and with the data corresponding to the production of a 30-times larger number of Higgs bosons, we have learnt much more about the properties of the Higgs boson. The CMS experiment has observed the Higgs boson in numerous fermionic and bosonic decay channels, established its spin–parity quantum numbers, determined its mass and measured its production cross-sections in various modes. Here the CMS Collaboration reports the most up-to-date combination of results on the properties of the Higgs boson, including the most stringent limit on the cross-section for the production of a pair of Higgs bosons, on the basis of data from proton–proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 teraelectronvolts. Within the uncertainties, all these observations are compatible with the predictions of the standard model of elementary particle physics. Much evidence points to the fact that the standard model is a low-energy approximation of a more comprehensive theory. Several of the standard model issues originate in the sector of Higgs boson physics. An order of magnitude larger number of Higgs bosons, expected to be examined over the next 15 years, will help deepen our understanding of this crucial sector.BMBWF and FWF (Austria); FNRS and FWO (Belgium); CNPq, CAPES, FAPERJ, FAPERGS, and FAPESP (Brazil); MES and BNSF (Bulgaria); CERN; CAS, MoST, and NSFC (China); MINCIENCIAS (Colombia); MSES and CSF (Croatia); RIF (Cyprus); SENESCYT (Ecuador); MoER, ERC PUT and ERDF (Estonia); Academy of Finland, MEC, and HIP (Finland); CEA and CNRS/IN2P3 (France); BMBF, DFG, and HGF (Germany); GSRI (Greece); NKFIH (Hungary); DAE and DST (India); IPM (Iran); SFI (Ireland); INFN (Italy); MSIP and NRF (Republic of Korea); MES (Latvia); LAS (Lithuania); MOE and UM (Malaysia); BUAP, CINVESTAV, CONACYT, LNS, SEP, and UASLP-FAI (Mexico); MOS (Montenegro); MBIE (New Zealand); PAEC (Pakistan); MES and NSC (Poland); FCT (Portugal); MESTD (Serbia); MCIN/AEI and PCTI (Spain); MOSTR (Sri Lanka); Swiss Funding Agencies (Switzerland); MST (Taipei); MHESI and NSTDA (Thailand); TUBITAK and TENMAK (Turkey); NASU (Ukraine); STFC (United Kingdom); DOE and NSF (USA). Individuals have received support from the Marie-Curie programme and the European Research Council and Horizon 2020 Grant, contract Nos. 675440, 724704, 752730, 758316, 765710, 824093, 884104, and COST Action CA16108 (European Union); the Leventis Foundation; the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation; the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office; the Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture (FRIA-Belgium); the Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie (IWT-Belgium); the F.R.S.-FNRS and FWO (Belgium) under the “Excellence of Science – EOS” – be.h project n. 30820817; the Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission, No. Z191100007219010; the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MEYS) of the Czech Republic; the Stavros Niarchos Foundation (Greece); the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), under Germany’s Excellence Strategy – EXC 2121 “Quantum Universe” – 390833306, and under project number 400140256 - GRK2497; the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, the New National Excellence Program - ÚNKP, the NKFIH research grants K 124845, K 124850, K 128713, K 128786, K 129058, K 131991, K 133046, K 138136, K 143460, K 143477, 2020-2.2.1-ED-2021-00181, and TKP2021-NKTA-64 (Hungary); the Council of Science and Industrial Research, India; the Latvian Council of Science; the Ministry of Education and Science, project no. 2022/WK/14, and the National Science Center, contracts Opus 2021/41/B/ST2/01369 and 2021/43/B/ST2/01552 (Poland); the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, grant CEECIND/01334/2018 (Portugal); the National Priorities Research Program by Qatar National Research Fund; MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, ERDF “a way of making Europe”, and the Programa Estatal de Fomento de la Investigación Científica y Técnica de Excelencia María de Maeztu, grant MDM-2017-0765 and Programa Severo Ochoa del Principado de Asturias (Spain); the Chulalongkorn Academic into Its 2nd Century Project Advancement Project, and the National Science, Research and Innovation Fund via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation, grant B05F650021 (Thailand); the Kavli Foundation; the Nvidia Corporation; the SuperMicro Corporation; the Welch Foundation, contract C-1845; and the Weston Havens Foundation (USA)

Measurement of the differential tt¯ production cross section as a function of the jet mass and extraction of the top quark mass in hadronic decays of boosted top quarks

Data Availability: This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: Release and preservation of data used by the CMS Collaboration as the basis for publications is guided by the CMS policy as stated in https://cms-docdb.cern.ch/cgibin/PublicDocDB/RetrieveFile?docid=6032 &filename=CMSDataPolicyV1.2.pdf &version=2.]A measurement of the jet mass distribution in hadronic decays of Lorentz-boosted top quarks is presented. The measurement is performed in the lepton + jets channel of top quark pair production (tt¯ ) events, where the lepton is an electron or muon. The products of the hadronic top quark decay are reconstructed using a single large-radius jet with transverse momentum greater than 400GeV . The data were collected with the CMS detector at the LHC in proton-proton collisions and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 138fb−1 . The differential tt¯ production cross section as a function of the jet mass is unfolded to the particle level and is used to extract the top quark mass. The jet mass scale is calibrated using the hadronic W boson decay within the large-radius jet. The uncertainties in the modelling of the final state radiation are reduced by studying angular correlations in the jet substructure. These developments lead to a significant increase in precision, and a top quark mass of 173.06±0.84GeV.SCOAP

1H NMR Study of Molecular Motions and Phase Transitions in Methyl Ammonium Hexabromo Selenate [(CH3NH3)2SeBr6]

The temperature dependence of 1H spin-lattice relaxation time, T1, and that of the second moment, M2, are analysed in the temperature range 390 K to 77 K. A plot of T1 vs inverse temperature shows three phase transitions at 250 K, 167 K and 111 K. At 167 K, T1 displays a large jump while it shows changes in slope at 250 K and 111 K. In the high temperature phase (> 167 K), the correlated motion of CH3 and NH3 groups is found to cause the relaxation while their uncorrelated motion takes over in the low temperature phases (< 167 K). The unusual T1 behaviour in phase II (250 K-167 K) is ascribed to the small angle torsion of the cation. A constant M2 value of ∼ 9.7 G2, throughout the range of temperature studied, indicates the presence of reorientation of CH3 and NH3 groups

NMR study of molecular dynamics in trimethyl ammonium hexabromo selenate [NH(CH3)3]2SeBr6[NH(CH_3)_3]_2SeBr_6

Temperature dependence of $^1H$ relaxation time, $T_1$, in the temperature range 387 to 77 K shows the presence of inequivalent trimethyl ammonium ions and methyl groups. The relaxation in the temperature range below 100 K is ascribed to the small angle torsion of the methyl groups. The variation of the second moment with temperature also reflects these internal motions (20 refs.

NMR study of molecular dynamics and phase transitions in dimethyl ammonium hexabromo selenate [NH2(CH3)2]2SeBr6[NH_2(CH_3)_2]_2SeBr_6

$^1H$ spin lattice relaxation study in the temperature range 439–77 K has been carried out in dimethyl ammonium (DMA) hexabromo selenate. A high temperature phase transition is observed as a dip in $T_1$ around 360 K, followed by a slope change a 222 K, and a discontinuous jump in $T_1$ at 154 K, which are also attributed to phase transitions. DMA diad axis motion and spin– rotation interaction are found to be the dominant mechanisms responsible for the observed $T_1$ behaviour above 222 K, while between 222 and 154 K, DMA torsional oscillations contribute significantly. Below 154 K the relaxation is governed by the methyl group dynamics. The motional effects are also reflected in the second moment variation with temperature

Proton NMR Study of Molecular Dynamics and Phase Transitions in Trimethyl Ammonium Hexachloro Plumbate [NH(CH3)3]2PbCl6{[NH{(CH_3)}_3]}_2PbCl_6 and Tetramethyl Ammonium Hexachloro Plumbate [N(CH3)4]2PbCl6{[N{(CH_3)}_4]}_2PbCl_6

The proton spin lattice relaxation time $(T_1)$ measured as a function of temperature in the range 424 to 119 K in trimethyl ammonium hexachloro plumbate $[(TrMA)_2PbCl_6]$ shows phase transitions at 340 and 119 K. The observed badly resolved minima in this compound are explained on the basis of C3 reorientations of inequivalent trimethyl ammonium and methyl groups. The computed second moment values, suggest the freezing of both types of reorientation around 117 K. Proton $T_1$ studies in tetramethyl ammonium hexachloro plumbate $[(TMA)_2PbCl_6]$ in the temperature range 295 to 106 K shows a deep $T_1$ minimum at 180 K and a shallow one around 111 K, which are interpreted in terms of inequivalent tetramethyl ammonium (TMA) ions as well as $CH_3$ reorientation

Molecular dynamics in tetramethylammonium hexabromoselenate [N(CH3)4]2SeBr(6)[N(CH_3)_4]2SeBr(6). A proton NMR study

$^1H$ spin-lattice relaxation time $T_1$ and second moment M2 have been studied as a function of temperature over the temperature range 445 to 77 K. A discontinuous change in $T_1$ at 365 K, indicates the presence of a phase transition, while the slope change at 152 K, is attributed to a change in the TMA ion dynamics from tumbling to torsion. The $T_1$ results could be explained in terms of inequivalent TMA ions and their small angle torsional oscillations. A second moment (M2) transition occurs around 160 K and is ascribed to the freezing of TMA tumbling and $CH_3$ reorientation