Clarithromycin-based Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy is not associated with higher treatment failure compared with non-clarithromycin-based regimens in a tertiary referral hospital in Switzerland.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Due to increasing antibiotic resistance, various Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens other than clarithromycin-based therapies have been proposed. However, detailed data on which therapies were employed and their eradication success is lacking. The purpose of this study was to analyse the response rates of different eradication therapy schemes. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we analysed data of 1721 patients and included 608 patients undergoing H. pylori eradication therapy at the Department of Gastroenterology at the University Hospital Zurich between 2004 and 2018. The primary endpoint was the success rates of clarithromycin- and non-clarithromycin-containing H. pylori eradication regimens. We furthermore analysed factors with potential impact on the outcome of H. pylori eradication therapies, such as demographics, and smoking and social status. RESULTS The most common therapy scheme (71% of all cases) was proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-amoxicillin-metronidazole, followed by PPI-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (21%) and PPI-metronidazole-clarithromycin (6%). There was no difference between the H. pylori eradication success of clarithromycin vs non-clarithromycin-containing therapies (71% vs 71%, p = 0.764). CONCLUSION Despite increasing clarithromycin resistance globally, there was no difference in the eradication success of clarithromycin- and non-clarithromycin-containing therapy regimens in Switzerland. As varying triple therapies do not increase eradication rates in real-world settings, other primary therapy options such as quadruple therapies should be explored

Solid Swallow Examination During High Resolution Manometry and EGJ-Distensibility Help Identify Esophageal Outflow Obstruction in Non-obstructive Dysphagia

Single water swallow (SWS) high-resolution manometry (HRM) may miss relevant esophageal motility disorders. Solid test meal (STM) during HRM and lately the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) have been shown to be of diagnostic value in the assessment of motility disorders. We aimed to assess the diagnostic yield of STM and FLIP in non-obstructive dysphagia (NOD). Patients assessed for dysphagia with both HRM and FLIP between April 2016 and August 2019 were analyzed for signs of non-obstructive EGJ outflow obstruction (EGJOO) according to Chicago Classification 3.0 (CCv3) and CC adapted for the use with solid swallows (CC-S), followed by an individual group-specific analysis. Five subjects without dysphagia served as control group. Standard HRM- and FLIP-values as well as esophagograms and Eckardt Scores were analyzed. Forty-two patients were identified (male/female, 14/36, median age 62). Twenty-five (59.5%) were diagnosed with EGJOO during STM only (= SWS-negative patients; CC-S). The EGJ distensibility index (EGJ-DI) of symptomatic patients was significantly lower compared to the control group (p = 0.006). EGJ-DI was < 3mm$^{2}$/mmHg in 67% and 88% of patients diagnosed according to CC-S and CCv3, respectively. The IRP during STM showed a significant association to the corresponding EGJ-DI values (p < 0.001). Seventy-six percent of patients received treatment because of additional STM evaluation with a favorable clinical response rate of 89%. STM and FLIP identify EGJOO in symptomatic patients with normal SWS during HRM. STM resembles an inexpensive and clinically meaningful option to diagnose motility disorders and helps to select patients for interventional treatment

Pyloric dilation with the esophageal functional lumen imaging probe in gastroparesis improves gastric emptying, pyloric distensibility, and symptoms

BACKGROUND AND AIMS The role of decreased pyloric distensibility in gastroparesis as measured by the endolumenal functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP) has been receiving increasing attention. In this study, we present clinical outcomes to pyloric dilation with the esophageal FLIP (EsoFLIP) in regard to gastric emptying, symptom evolution, and FLIP metrics. METHODS Patients evaluated for gastroparesis (gastric emptying studies of t$_{1/2}$ ≥180 minutes during $^{13}$C-octanoic acid breath test and/or gastric remnants during gastroscopy after a sufficient fasting period) were scheduled for EsoFLIP controlled pyloric dilation. Pre- and postprocedural gastric emptying studies, questionnaires (Patient Assessment of Upper GI Symptoms Severity Index [PAGI-SYM; including the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index] and Patient Assessment of Quality of Life Index [PAGI-QOL]), and FLIP metrics were documented. Dilation was conducted according to a self-developed algorithm. RESULTS Forty-six patients were analyzed (72% women; median age, 39 years [range, 18-88]). Etiologies of gastroparesis were diabetic in 10 patients (22%), idiopathic in 33 (72%), and postoperative in 3 (6%). Postprocedural gastric emptying time decreased from a median of 211 minutes to 179 minutes (P = .001). In accordance, pyloric distensibility, PAGI-SYM, PAGI-QOL, and Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index values improved significantly. After a median follow-up of 3.9 months, 57% of all treated patients with returned questionnaires reported improved symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Pyloric EsoFLIP controlled dilation shows value in the treatment of gastroparesis, both subjectively and objectively. Long-term follow-up to assess efficacy and comparative trials are warranted

Management of biliary obstruction in patients with newly diagnosed alveolar echinococcosis: a Swiss retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Alveolar echinococcosis, an orphan zoonosis affecting the liver, is of increasing concern worldwide. Most symptomatic cases present at an advanced and inoperable stage, sometimes with biliary obstruction prompting biliary tract interventions. These are, however, associated with a high risk of infectious complications. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of conservative and interventional treatment approaches in patients with newly diagnosed alveolar echinococcosis and biliary obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Alveolar echinococcosis patients treated at two referral centres in Switzerland, presenting with hyperbilirubinaemia (total bilirubin >1.5 Upper Limit of Normal) at diagnosis were included, unless another underlying aetiology, i.e. common bile duct stones or decompensated cirrhosis, was identified. Patients were divided into two groups, according to whether they initially received a biliary tract intervention. The primary endpoint was normalisation of bilirubin levels within a 6-month period. Secondary endpoints included, among others, the occurrence of early and late biliary complications, the need for biliary tract interventions during follow-up and overall duration of hospital stays for treatment initiation and for biliary complications. RESULTS: 28 patients were included in this study, of whom 17 received benzimidazole therapy alone and 11 additionally received a biliary tract intervention. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. All but one patient in each group achieved the primary endpoint (p=0.747). Biliary tract intervention was associated with faster laboratory improvement (t1/2 1.3 vs 3.0 weeks), but also with more frequent early biliary complications (7/11 vs 1/17, p=0.002) and longer initial hospital stay (18 days vs 7 days, p=0.007). CONCLUSION: Biliary obstruction in patients with newly diagnosed alveolar echinococcosis can be treated effectively with benzimidazole therapy alone. Biliary tract intervention, on the other hand, is associated with a high complication rate and should probably be reserved for patients with insufficient response to benzimidazole therapy

Modified full-thickness resection of a small subepithelial tumor with the help of a corkscrew

With the advent of endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR), small subepithelial tumors (SETs) became easily resectable both in upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Several studies have suggested that complete resection of SETs is achievable in the vast majority of cases and severe complications occur only rarely [1]. Whereas technical success in the case of mucosal or submucosal lesions is easy to accomplish, for tumors arising from the muscularis propria, an R0 resection is more difficult to achieve by EFTR [1]. Grasping these lesions with the Twin Grasper may lead to tenting of the mucosa and submucosa, which in turn leads to incomplete removal of the SET. To overcome this technical problem, we herein present the feasibility of EFTR using a tissue-retracting helix device that was originally designed as part of the OverStitch endoscopic suturing system (Apollo Endosurgery Inc., Austin, Texas, USA). We describe the case of a 75-year-old patient who was referred for removal of an incidental SET in the proximal gastric corpus. Endosonography suggested a small gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) ([Fig. 1]). After the lesion had been marked ([Fig. 2 a]), the gastroduodenal EFTR device (Ovesco, Tübingen, Germany) was mounted onto the endoscope and the helix device was advanced through the working channel. Once the endoscope was centered over the lesion, it was gradually punctured with the helix; the device was then manually rotated (like a corkscrew), resulting in tissue approximation. After this “fixation” procedure, it was easy to retract the lesion into the cap using gentle suction. The SET was then resected in the usual fashion, with adequate closure of the resection site ([Fig. 2 b]; [Video 1]). The resected specimen ([Fig. 3]) was shown histologically to be a completely resected leiomyoma

Rare infectious complication following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: A case report

Infectious complications are common adverse events of solid organ transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy. In the perioperative setting, most infections are of bacterial or viral origin. Risk assessment of donor and recipient focuses mostly on blood-borne pathogens. Occasionally, parasitic infections are reported after transplantation. In regard to the latter, we report the case of a 57-year-old patient who underwent simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation and shortly thereafter developed diarrhea, abdominal bloating and weight loss due to Giardia duodenalis

Short-term outcome after singular hydraulic EsoFLIP dilation in patients with achalasia: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a chronic esophageal motility disorder characterized by impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter, determined by an elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP > 15 mm Hg) and absent peristalsis. Goal of treatment is facilitation of flow across the EGJ but minimizing postinterventional reflux. A new advanced hydraulic dilation technology, the esophageal functional luminal imaging probe (EsoFLIP), allows dynamic monitoring of hollow organ dimensions while performing hydraulic dilation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the treatment response after single EsoFLIP dilation in achalasia patients. METHODS: Dilation was performed under endoscopic control with the EsoFLIP device using a self-developed dilation algorithm. Symptom scores were assessed by the Eckardt score (ES) before and 1-4 weeks after intervention. Esophageal emptying before and after intervention was recorded with timed barium esophagogram. KEY RESULTS: We studied 28 consecutive untreated achalasia patients (8 female) with a median age of 43 years (range 19-82 years) undergoing their first dilation performed with the EsoFLIP, aiming at a maximum dilation diameter of 25 mm. Total ES was significantly reduced from 7 at baseline to 2 postintervention (P < .001). The median height of the barium column after 5 minutes was significantly reduced from 4.5 cm at baseline to 1.7 cm (P = .0087). No major complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: We found good efficacy in both subjective and objective short-term treatment outcome after singular EsoFLIP dilation in treatment-naive achalasia patients. Our findings suggest that EsoFLIP is a promising dilation technology that should be further studied in a larger, controlled setting with longer follow-up

Permanent Tunneled Drainage of Ascites in Palliative Patients: Timing Needs Evaluation

Background: Treatment of refractory ascites remains challenging. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of permanent tunneled peritoneal catheters (PTPC) in this condition. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients in palliative situations in a tertiary referral center. Safety parameters, symptom relief, and survival were assessed. Results: Seventy patients were included from February 2012 to January 2021. Ninety percent had ascites due to malignancy, 10% due to end-stage liver disease. The technical procedure was successful in all cases; no deaths occurred. Procedure-related infections were rare and only observed in patients without peri-interventional antibiotics. Most patients experienced symptom relief (76%) and were satisfied with the device (83%). Survival after PTPC was relatively short (median 19 days). Discussion: PTPC is a safe option for refractory ascites in palliative settings with symptom relief in the majority of patients and should be considered early after onset of ascites. Periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis may be considered to avoid procedure-related infections

Efficient treatment of esophageal nutrition bezoars: dissolution outmatches removal-the Zurich approach

Enteral feed bezoars are difficult to treat and can lead to serious adverse events. There is no standardized treatment approach and various strategies have been suggested. We herein describe three cases of successful dissolutions of feed bezoars consisting of Promote® Fibre Plus with sodium bicarbonate 8.4% in critically ill patients. To provide the rationale for this approach, the effect of sodium bicarbonate 8.4% on enteral feed concretions was studied in vitro. First, Promote® Fibres Plus was incubated with hydrochloric acid with gradually decreasing pH values to establish a pH at which the solution solidifies. The resulting enteral feed concretion was exposed to sodium bicarbonate 8.4% and Coca Cola®. All patients were successfully treated with sodium bicarbonate 8.4% without the need of lengthy or repeat endoscopies. In vitro, Promote® Fibres Plus solidifies when acidified below a pH of 4.6. The resulting enteral feed concretions dissolved when exposed to sodium bicarbonate 8.4%. Incubation with Coca Cola® had no effect. We provide evidence that enteral feed bezoars consisting of Promote® Fibres Plus can be efficiently and safely treated with sodium bicarbonate 8.4% offering a new approach for daily patient care. Keywords: Enteral feed bezoar; Enteral feeding; Sodium bicarbonate