4 research outputs found

    Multiple Aggregates and Aggresomes of C-Terminal Truncated Human αA-Crystallins in Mammalian Cells and Protection by αB-Crystallin

    Get PDF
    Cleavage of 11 (αA162), 5 (αA168) and 1 (αA172) residues from the C-terminus of αA-crystallin creates structurally and functionally different proteins. The formation of these post-translationally modified αA-crystallins is enhanced in diabetes. In the present study, the fate of the truncated αA-crystallins expressed in living mammalian cells in the presence and absence of native αA- or αB-crystallin has been studied by laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSM).YFP tagged αAwt, αA162, αA168 and αA172, were individually transfected or co-transfected with CFP tagged αAwt or αBwt, expressed in HeLa cells and studied by LSM. Difference in protein aggregation was not caused by different level of α-crystallin expression because Western blotting results showed nearly same level of expression of the various α-crystallins. The FRET-acceptor photo-bleaching protocol was followed to study in situ protein-protein interaction. αA172 interacted with αAwt and αBwt better than αA168 and αA162, interaction of αBwt being two-fold stronger than that of αAwt. Furthermore, aggresomes were detected in cells individually expressing αA162 and αA168 constructs and co-expression with αBwt significantly sequestered the aggresomes. There was no sequestration of aggresomes with αAwt co-expression with the truncated constructs, αA162 and αA168. Double immunocytochemistry technique was used for co-localization of γ-tubulin with αA-crystallin to demonstrate the perinuclear aggregates were aggresomes.αA172 showed the strongest interaction with both αAwt and αBwt. Native αB-crystallin provided protection to partially unfolded truncated αA-crystallins whereas native αA-crystallin did not. Aggresomes were detected in cells expressing αA162 and αA168 and αBwt co-expression with these constructs diminished the aggresome formation. Co-localization of γ-tubulin in perinuclear aggregates validates for aggresomes

    Safety of maintaining elective and emergency surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic with the introduction of a Protected Elective Surgical Unit (PESU): A cross-specialty evaluation of 30-day outcomes in 9,925 patients undergoing surgery in a University Health Board

    Get PDF
    Background The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented health care challenges mandating surgical service reconfiguration. Within our hospital, emergency and elective streams were separated and self-contained Protected Elective Surgical Units were developed to mitigate against infection-related morbidity. Aims of this study were to determine the risk of COVID-19 transmission and mortality and whether the development of Protected Elective Surgical Units can result in significant reduction in risk. Methods A retrospective observational study of consecutive patients from 18 specialties undergoing elective or emergency surgery under general, spinal, or epidural anaesthetic over a 12-month study period was undertaken. Primary outcome measures were 30-day postoperative COVID-19 transmission rate and mortality. Secondary adjusted analyses were performed to ascertain hospital and Protected Elective Surgical Unit transmission rates. Results Between 15 March 2020 and 14 March 2021, 9,925 patients underwent surgery: 6,464 (65.1%) elective, 5,116 (51.5%) female, and median age 57 (39–70). A total of 69.5% of all procedures were performed in Protected Elective Surgical Units. Overall, 30-day postoperative COVID-19 transmission was 2.8% (3.4% emergency vs 1.2% elective P  70, male sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade > 2, and emergency surgery were all independently associated with mortality. Conclusion This study has demonstrated that Protected Elective Surgical Units can facilitate high-volume elective surgical services throughout peaks of the COVID-19 pandemic while minimising viral transmission and mortality. However, mortality risk associated with perioperative COVID-19 infection remains high

    Genetic susceptibility to Tardive Dyskinesia in chronic schizophrenia subjects: I. Association of CYP1A2 gene polymorphism

    No full text
    Understanding the pharmacogenetic basis of developing iatrogenic disorders such as Tardive Dyskinesia (TD) has significant clinical implications. CYP1A2, an inducible gene of the cytochrome P450 family of genes, has been suggested to contribute to the metabolism of typical antipsychotics in subjects with schizophrenia on long-term treatment, and has been considered as a potential candidate gene for development of TD. In this study, we have investigated the significance of CYP1A2 gene polymorphisms in TD susceptibility among chronic schizophrenia sufferers (n=335) from north India. TD was diagnosed in ~29% (96/335) of these subjects. Of the 96 TD positives, 28 had been treated with typical antipsychotics alone, 23 with atypical antipsychotics alone and 45 patients had received both classes of drugs during the course of their illness. Out of the six SNPs tested, CYP1A2*2 *4 *5 *6 were found to be monomorphic in our population. CYP1A2*1C and CYP1A2*1F were polymorphic and were analyzed in the study sample. Since these two allelic variants lead to lesser inducibility among smokers, the smoking status of TD patients was also considered for all subsequent analysis. We observed increased severity of TD among TD-Y smokers, who were carriers of CYP1A2*1C (G>A) variant allele and had received only typical antipsychotic drugs (F(1,8)=9.203, P=0.016). No significant association of CYP1A*21F with TD was observed irrespective of the class of drug they received or their smoking status. However, we found a significant association of CYP1A2*1F with schizophrenia (χ2=6.572, df=2, P=0.037)
    corecore