2 research outputs found

    SMAD4 - Molecular gladiator of the TGF-β signaling is trampled upon by mutational insufficiency in colorectal carcinoma of Kashmiri population: an analysis with relation to KRAS proto-oncogene

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The development and progression of colorectal cancer has been extensively studied and the genes responsible have been well characterized. However the correlation between the <it>SMAD4 </it>gene mutations with <it>KRAS </it>mutant status has not been explored by many studies so far. Here, in this study we aimed to investigate the role of <it>SMAD4 </it>gene aberrations in the pathogenesis of CRC in Kashmir valley and to correlate it with various clinicopathological variables and <it>KRAS </it>mutant genotype.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We examined the paired tumor and normal tissue specimens of 86 CRC patients for the occurrence of aberrations in MCR region of <it>SMAD4 </it>and exon 1 of <it>KRAS </it>by PCR-SSCP and/or PCR-Direct sequencing.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The overall mutation rate of mutation cluster region (MCR) region of <it>SMAD4 </it>gene among 86 patients was 18.6% (16 of 86). 68.75% (11/16) of the <it>SMAD4 </it>gene mutants were found to have mutations in <it>KRAS </it>gene as well. The association between the <it>KRAS </it>mutant genotype with <it>SMAD4 </it>mutants was found to be significant (P =< 0.05). Further more, we found a significant association of tumor location, tumor grade, node status, occupational exposure to pesticides and bleeding PR/Constipation with the mutation status of the <it>SMAD4 </it>gene (P =< 0.05).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our study suggests that <it>SMAD4 </it>gene aberrations are the common event in CRC development but play a differential role in the progression of CRC in higher tumor grade (C+D) and its association with the <it>KRAS </it>mutant status suggest that these two molecules together are responsible for the progression of the tumor to higher/advanced stage.</p

    A Comparison of Biomarkers in the Assessment of Glycemic Control in Diabetes: Reviewing the Evidence

    No full text
    corecore