Eficacia y posible posicionamiento del tezepelumab para tratar el asma grave

Phenotype; Thymic stromal lymphopoietin; Uncontrolled asthmaFenotip; Limfopoetina estromal tímica; Asma no controladaFenotipo; Linfopoyetina estromal tímica; Asma no controladaThe excellent results for monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of severe uncontrolled asthma (SUCA) represent a milestone in current treatment of asthmatic disorders. Remaining, however, are several subsidiary areas for improvement in which new biologics are expected to make a decisive contribution. These biologics include tezepelumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). TSLP is an epithelial-release cytokine (alarmin) that plays a key role in initiating both the innate (group 2 innate lymphoid cell (ILC) pathway) and the acquired (T helper 2 (Th2) pathway) immune responses by activating the type 2 (T2) asthma inflammatory pathway through both. It is also thought that it may additionally intervene in the neutrophilic non-T2 inflammatory pathway (via interaction with ILC3 and interleukin-17). Six clinical trials that included 2187 patients with uncontrolled asthma, with 2 or more exacerbations in the previous year, on medium/high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and at least 1 other controller, have demonstrated – irrespective of T2 endotype (and possibly also non-T2 endotype) – the efficacy and safety of tezepelumab, as it significantly reduces exacerbations (61.7%–66%) and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and improves lung function, disease control, and quality of life. Tezepelumab could be indicated for the treatment of patients with, independently of the T2 phenotype (eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic), and may even be the only biologic available for treatment of non-T2 SUCA.Los excelentes resultados de los anticuerpos monoclonales en el tratamiento del asma grave no controlada (AGNC) constituyen un hito en el tratamiento actual de los trastornos asmáticos. Sin embargo, aún quedan varios aspectos complementarios susceptibles de mejorar para los que se esperan contribuciones decisivas de los nuevos biofármacos, entre los cuales se encuentra el tezepelumab, un anticuerpo monoclonal que bloquea la linfopoyetina estromal tímica (TSLP). La TSLP es una citocina de liberación epitelial (alarmina) que desempeña una función clave en el inicio de las respuestas inmunitarias tanto innata (vía de las células linfocíticas innatas [ILC] del grupo 2) como adaptativa (vía de los linfocitos T cooperadores 2 [Th2]), activando la vía inflamatoria del asma del tipo 2 (T2) mediante ambas. También se cree que puede intervenir en la vía inflamatoria neutrofílica con T2 baja (mediante la interacción con los ILC3 y la interleucina 17). En seis ensayos clínicos que incluyeron a 2.187 pacientes con asma no controlada, dos o más exacerbaciones en el año anterior, a tratamiento con corticosteroides inhalados en dosis medias o altas y con un mínimo de un tratamiento preventivo adicional, se ha demostrado la eficacia y seguridad del tezepelumab sin importar el endotipo T2 (y posiblemente tampoco el endotipo no T2), ya que reduce significativamente las exacerbaciones (61,7-66%) y la hiperreactividad bronquial y mejora la función pulmonar, el control de la enfermedad y la calidad de vida. El tezepelumab puede estar indicado para tratar a pacientes con asma grave, independientemente del fenotipo T2 (eosinofílico y no eosinofílico), y tal vez sea incluso el único biofármaco existente para el tratamiento del AGNC no T2.This article was funded by the Barcelona Respiratory Network (BRN) who did not participate in the articles selected or writing of the manuscript

Benefit of switching to mepolizumab from omalizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma based on patient characteristics

Asma; Tractament de l'asma; EosinòfilsAsma; Tratamiento del asma; EosinófilosAsthma; Asthma treatment; EosinophilsBackground The OSMO study assessed the efficacy of switching to mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma that was uncontrolled whilst receiving omalizumab. The objective of this analysis was to assess the proportion of patients achieving pre-defined improvements in up to four efficacy outcomes and the relationship between patient baseline characteristics and treatment response. Methods This was a post hoc analysis of OSMO study data (GSK ID:204471; ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT02654145). Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma uncontrolled by high-dose inhaled corticosteroids, other controller(s) and omalizumab subcutaneously (≥ 4 months) were switched to mepolizumab 100 mg administered subcutaneously. Endpoints included the proportion of responders—i.e. patients achieving a pre-defined clinical improvement in ≥ 1 of the following outcomes: (1) Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-5 score (≥ 0.5-points), (2) St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (≥ 4-points), (3) pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1; ≥ 100 mL), all at Week 32, and (4) annualised rate of clinically significant exacerbations (≥ 50% reduction). Results Of the 145 patients included, 94%, 83%, 63% and 31% were responders for ≥ 1, ≥ 2, ≥ 3 and 4 outcomes, respectively; 75% and 78% were ACQ-5 and SGRQ score responders, and 50% and 69% were FEV1 and exacerbation responders. Subgroup analyses demonstrated improvements irrespective of baseline blood eosinophil count, prior omalizumab treatment regimen/duration, comorbidities, prior exacerbation history, maintenance oral corticosteroid use, ACQ-5 and SGRQ scores, and body weight/body mass index. Conclusions After switching to mepolizumab, almost all patients with uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma on omalizumab achieved a beneficial response in ≥ 1 clinical outcome. Improvements were observed regardless of baseline characteristics.This post hoc analysis and the parent study (GSK ID: 204471; ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02654145) were funded by GSK

Work-related dysphonia in subjects with occupational asthma is associated with neutrophilic airway inflammation

Dysphonia; Neutrophilic inflammation; Occupational asthmaDisfonía; Inflamación neutrofílica; Asma ocupacionalDisfonia; Inflamació neutròfila; Asma ocupaciona

Is asthma a risk factor for COVID-19? Are phenotypes important?

Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; 2019-nCoV; Infeccions respiratòries i tuberculosi; Asma i al·lèrgiaCoronavirus SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; 2019-nCoV; COVID-19; Infecciones respiratorias y tuberculosis; Asma y alergiaCoronavirus SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; 2019-nCoV; Respiratory infections and tuberculosis; Asthma and allergyThese results reaffirm the idea that asthma does not appear to be a risk factor for the development of #COVID19. However, most of the asthma patients in this study had a non-T2 phenotype

Cost-effectiveness analysis of anti–IL-5 therapies of severe eosinophilic asthma in Spain

Asma eosinofílica greu; Comparació indirecta del tractament; MepolizumabSevere eosinophilic asthma; Indirect treatment comparison; MepolizumabAsma eosinofílica severa; Comparación de tratamiento indirecto; MepolizumabAim To analyse the cost-effectiveness of MEP with standard of care (SoC) versus other anti-IL-5 therapies approved for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) patients, within the Spanish National Health System (NHS) perspective. Methods A Markov model with a 4-week cycle length was used to compare MEP with BEN and RES as therapies added to SoC in the management of SEA, in terms of cost per QALY gained and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Costs (€2019) were obtained from public sources, while utilities and transition probabilities were retrieved from literature, e.g. network meta-analysis. Continuation criteria for biological treatment and reduction of oral corticosteroids (OCS) was set at 50% minimum reduction of exacerbation rate. Adverse events related to chronic OCS use included diabetes, osteoporosis, cataracts, acute myocardial infarct, and peptic ulcer. The analysis was performed over a 5-year time horizon from the National Healthcare System (NHCS) perspective, with a yearly discount rate of 3% applied to both costs and QALYs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis and univariate deterministic sensitivity analysis were performed to address uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness results. Results On top of SoC, the model indicates that MEP is dominant (lower cost, higher benefit) compared to BEN and RES: For BEN and RES, respectively, treatment with MEP had a point estimate of 0.076 and 0.075 additional QALYs, and savings of €3,173.47 and €7,772.95 per patient. The findings were robust to variation as estimated using sensitivity analysis. Conclusions MEP is a cost-effective treatment in comparison with BEN and RES added to SoC for patients with SEA in the Spanish setting.This study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline [Study code: HO-19-19968]

Risk factors for the development of bronchiectasis in patients with asthma

Asthma; Medical researchAsma; Investigación médicaAsma; Recerca mèdicaThough asthma and bronchiectasis are two different diseases, their coexistence has been demonstrated in many patients. The aim of the present study is to compare the characteristics of asthmatic patients with and without bronchiectasis and to assess risk factors for the development of this condition. Two hundred and twenty-four moderate-severe asthmatic patients were included. The severity of bronchiectasis was assessed by Reiff and FACED parameters. Logistic regression was used to identify independent factors associated with bronchiectasis. Bronchiectasis was identified in 78 asthma patients. In severe asthma patients, its prevalence was 56.9%. Bronchiectasis was defined as mild in81% of patients using modified Reiff criteria and in 74% using FACED criteria. Asthmatic patients with bronchiectasis had decreasing FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC (p = 0.002, 0.005 and 0.014 respectively), presented more frequent asthma exacerbations (p < 0.001) and worse asthma control (ACT 21 vs 16pts, p < 0.001). Factors independently associated with bronchiectasis were older age (42–65 years: OR, 3.99; 95% CI 1.60 to 9.95, P = 0.003; ≥ 65 years: OR, 2.91; 95% CI 1.06 to 8.04, P = 0.039), severe asthma grade (OR, 8.91; 95% CI 3.69 to 21.49; P < 0.001) and frequency of asthma exacerbations (OR, 4.43; 95% CI 1.78 to 11.05; P < 0.001). In patients with severe asthma, age of asthma onset (OR, 1.02; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04; P = 0.015) and asthma exacerbations (OR, 4.88; 95% CI 1.98 to 12.03; P = 0.001) were independently associated with the development of bronchiectasis. The prevalence of bronchiectasis in severe asthmatic patients is high. Age of asthma onset and exacerbations were independent factors associated with the occurrence of bronchiectasis.The study was partially supported by FIS PI15/01900 (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) and Fundacio Catalana de Pneumología (FUCAP). MJC is supported by the Miguel Servet program of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (MSII17/00025). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

Influence of the environment on the characteristics of asthma

Environmental sciences; Health careCiències ambientals; Atenció sanitàriaCiencias Ambientales; Atención sanitariaFew studies have compared the prevalence of asthma in urban and rural settings or explored the issue of whether these two manifestations of the disease may represent different phenotypes. The aim of this study was: (a) to establish whether the prevalence of asthma differs between rural and urban settings, and b) to identify differences in the clinical presentation of asthma in these two environments. Descriptive epidemiological study involving individuals aged 18 or over from a rural (n = 516) and an urban population (n = 522). In the first phase, individuals were contacted by letter in order to organize the administration of a first validated questionnaire (Q1) designed to establish the possible prevalence of bronchial asthma. In the second phase, patients who had presented association patterns in the set of variables related to asthma in Q1 completed a second validated questionnaire (Q2), designed to identify the characteristics of asthma. According to Q1, the prevalence of asthma was 15% (n = 78) and 11% (n = 59) in rural and urban populations respectively. Sixty-five individuals with asthma from the rural population and all 59 individuals from the urban population were contacted and administered the Q2. Thirty-seven per cent of the individuals surveyed had previously been diagnosed with bronchial asthma (35% in the rural population and 40% in the urban setting). In the urban asthmatic population there was a predominance of women, a greater personal history of allergic rhinitis and a family history of allergic rhinitis and/or eczema. Asthma was diagnosed in adulthood in 74.8% of the patients, with no significant differences between the two populations. Regarding symptoms, cough (morning, daytime and night) and expectoration were more frequent in the urban population. The prevalence of asthma does not differ between urban and rural settings. The differences in exposure that characterize each environment may lead to different manifestations of the disease and may also affect its severity.MJC is supported by the Miguel Servet program of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (MSII17/00025). This project received funding from the Fundació Catalana de Pneumologia (FUCAP), FIS PI18/00344, Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) and Menarini. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

A Study of the Prevalence of Asthma in the General Population in Spain

Asma; Epidemiología; PrevalenciaAsthma; Epidemilogy; PrevalenceAsma; Epidemiologia; PrevalençaIntroducción El asma es una enfermedad con elevada prevalencia, que afecta a todos los grupos de edad y genera elevados costes sociosanitarios. Estudios realizados en diversas poblaciones muestran gran variabilidad en su prevalencia, incluso en poblaciones cercanas geográficamente, con datos que sugieren una influencia relevante de factores socioeconómicos. Actualmente en población adulta de España no disponemos de datos poblacionales fiables sobre la prevalencia de esta enfermedad. Los objetivos de este estudio son estimar la prevalencia de asma en población española de 18-79 años, describir la variabilidad entre comunidades autónomas, estimar la prevalencia de infra y sobrediagnóstico, prevalencia de asma no controlada, de asma córticodependiente, conocer el consumo de recursos sanitarios, identificar los fenotipos más frecuentes y establecer un punto de partida para evaluar la tendencia temporal con estudios posteriores. Material y métodos Se realizará un estudio transversal, bietápico, incluyendo pacientes de 50 áreas sanitarias. El estudio se desarrollará en tres fases: 1) cribado y confirmación en historia clínica, en la cual se identificarán los pacientes con diagnóstico previo correctamente establecido de asma; 2) diagnóstico de asma, evaluando a los pacientes en los cuales no está claro el diagnóstico de asma con los datos disponibles en la historia clínica; 3) caracterización del asma, analizando las características de estos pacientes e identificando los fenotipos más frecuentes. Discusión Parece necesario y factible realizar un estudio epidemiológico del asma en España que permita identificar la prevalencia de asma, optimizar la planificación sanitaria, caracterizar los fenotipos más frecuentes de la enfermedad y evaluar los diagnósticos erróneos.Introduction Asthma is a disease with high prevalence, which affects all age groups and generates high health and social care costs. Studies carried out in a number of populations show great variability in its prevalence, even in geographically close populations, with data suggesting a relevant influence of socio-economic factors. At present, we do not have reliable data on the prevalence of this disease in the adult population of Spain. The objectives of this study are to estimate the prevalence of asthma in the Spanish population for those aged 18-79, to describe the variability between autonomous communities, to estimate the prevalence of under and overdiagnosis, to analyse the prevalence of uncontrolled asthma and steroid-dependent asthma, to evaluate the health care cost, to identify the most frequent phenotypes and to establish a starting point to evaluate the temporal trend with subsequent studies. Methods A cross-sectional, two-stage study will be carried out, including patients from 50 catchment areas. The study will be carried out in 3 phases: 1) screening and confirmation in the clinical history, in which patients with a previously correctly established diagnosis of asthma will be identified; 2) diagnosis of asthma to evaluate patients without a confirmed or excluded diagnosis; 3) characterization of asthma, where the characteristics of the asthmatic patients will be analysed, identifying the most frequent phenotypes. Discussion It seems necessary and feasible to carry out an epidemiological study of asthma in Spain to identify the prevalence of asthma, to optimize healthcare planning, to characterize the most frequent phenotypes of the disease, and to evaluate inaccurate diagnoses.Este trabajo ha sido financiado por el Foro Autonómico de Asma-SEPAR

Analysis of Differentially Expressed MicroRNAs in Serum and Lung Tissues from Individuals with Severe Asthma Treated with Oral Glucocorticoids

Biomarker; Individuals with severe asthma; Oral corticosteroidsBiomarcador; Persones amb asma greu; Corticosteroides oralsBiomarcador; Personas con asma grave; Corticosteroides oralesNowadays, microRNAs (miRNAs) are increasingly used as biomarkers due to their potential contribution to the diagnosis and targeted treatment of a range of diseases. The aim of the study was to analyze the miRNA expression profiles in serum and lung tissue from patients with severe asthma treated with oral corticosteroids (OCS) and those without OCS treatment. For this purpose, serum and lung tissue miRNAs of OCS and non-OCS asthmatic individuals were evaluated by miRNAs-Seq, and subsequently miRNA validation was performed using RT-qPCR. Additionally, pathway enrichment analysis of deregulated miRNAs was conducted. We observed altered expression by the next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 11 miRNAs in serum, of which five (hsa-miR-148b-3p, hsa-miR-221-5p, hsa-miR-618, hsa-miR-941, and hsa-miR-769-5p) were validated by RT-qPCR, and three miRNAs in lung tissue (hsa-miR-144-3p, hsa-miR-144-5p, and hsa-miR-451a). The best multivariate logistic regression model to differentiate individuals with severe asthma, treated and untreated with OCS, was to combine the serum miRNAs hsa-miR-221-5p and hsa-miR-769-5p. Expression of hsa-miR-148b-3p and hsa-miR-221-5p correlated with FEV1/FVC (%) and these altered miRNAs act in key signaling pathways for asthma disease and the regulated expression of some genes (FOXO3, PTEN, and MAPK3) involved in these pathways. In conclusion, there are miRNA profiles differentially expressed in OCS-treated individuals with asthma and could be used as biomarkers of OCS treatment.This work was supported by ISCIII—Instituto de Salud Carlos III, FIS (Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria—Spanish Health Research Fund) grants PI18/00167, PI21/00896, and FI19/00067; Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES); RTC-2017-6501-1 (Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades), a Carlos III Institute of Health Initiative; and FEDER funds (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional)

Lung Ultrasound as a First-Line Test in the Evaluation of Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Sequelae

COVID-19; Lung ultrasound (LUS); Pulmonary sequelaeCOVID-19; Ecografía pulmonar (LUS); Secuelas pulmonaresCOVID-19; Ecografia pulmonar (LUS); Seqüeles pulmonarsBackground: Interstitial lung sequelae are increasingly being reported in survivors of COVID-19 pneumonia. An early detection of these lesions may help prevent the development of irreversible lung fibrosis. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has shown high diagnostic accuracy in interstitial lung disease (ILD) and could likely be used as a first-line test for post-COVID-19 lung sequelae. Methods: Single-center observational prospective study. Follow-up assessments of consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia were conducted 2–5 months after the hospitalization. All patients underwent pulmonary function tests (PFTs), high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and LUS. Radiological alterations in HRCT were quantified using the Warrick score. The LUS score was obtained by evaluating the presence of pathological B-lines in 12 thoracic areas (range, 0–12). The correlation between the LUS and Warrick scores was analyzed. Results: Three hundred and fifty-two patients who recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia were recruited between July and September 2020. At follow-up, dyspnea was the most frequent symptom (69.3%). FVC and DLCO alterations were present in 79 (22.4%) and 234 (66.5%) patients, respectively. HRCT showed relevant interstitial lung sequelae (RILS) in 154 (43.8%) patients (Warrick score ≥ 7). The LUS score was strongly correlated with the HRCT Warrick score (r = 0.77) and showed a moderate inverse correlation with DLCO (r = −0.55). The ROC curve analysis revealed that a LUS score ≥ 3 indicated an excellent ability to discriminate patients with RILS (sensitivity, 94.2%; specificity, 81.8%; negative predictive value, 94.7%). Conclusions: LUS could be implemented as a first-line procedure in the evaluation of Post-COVID-19 interstitial lung sequelae. A normal LUS examination rules out the presence of these sequelae in COVID-19 survivors, avoiding the need for additional diagnostic tests such as HRCT