4 research outputs found
Arabic speech recognition using end‐to‐end deep learning
- Author
- AbdAlmisreb A.
- Ahmed A.
- Ahmed B.H.
- Algihab W.
- AlHanai T.
- Ali A.
- Ali A.
- Almosallam I.
- Amodei D.
- Azim M.
- Azim M.A.
- Bahdanau D.
- Bahdanau D.
- Belinkov Y.
- Bengio S.
- Cardinal P.
- Chan W.
- Chorowski J.
- Chorowski J.
- Chorowski J.K.
- Diehl F.
- Ettaouil M.
- Graves A.
- Gulcehre C.
- Hadjir I.
- Hamed O.
- Hannun A.
- Hayashi T.
- He K.
- Hmad N.
- Hori T.
- Hori T.
- Kannan A.
- Khatatneh K.
- Kim S.
- Kuchaiev O.
- Luong M.T.
- Miao Y.
- Mousa A.E.D.
- Nagamine T.
- Nagamine T.
- Povey D.
- Povey D.
- Pratap V.
- Rath S.P.
- Satori H.
- See A.
- Smit P.
- Szegedy C.
- Tomashenko N.
- Toshniwal S.
- Vaswani A.
- Vergyri D.
- Wahyuni E.S.
- Wang Y.
- Watanabe S.
- Watanabe S.
- Wu Y.
- Xiao Z.
- Zerari N.
- Zerari N.
- Zhang Y.
- Zhou S.
- Publication venue
- 'Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)'
- Publication date
- Field of study
Measurement of single-diffractive dijet production in proton–proton collisions at √s=8Te with the CMS and TOTEM experiments
- Publication venue
- Publication date
- 01/01/2020
- Field of study
Measurements are presented of the single-diffractive dijet cross section and the diffractive cross section as a function of the proton fractional momentum loss ξ and the four-momentum transfer squared t. Both processes pp→pX and pp→Xp, i.e. with the proton scattering to either side of the interaction point, are measured, where X includes at least two jets; the results of the two processes are averaged. The analyses are based on data collected simultaneously with the CMS and TOTEM detectors at the LHC in proton–proton collisions at s=8Te during a dedicated run with β∗=90m at low instantaneous luminosity and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 37.5nb-1. The single-diffractive dijet cross section σjjpX, in the kinematic region ξ< 0.1 , 0.03<|t|<1Ge2, with at least two jets with transverse momentum pT>40Ge, and pseudorapidity | η| < 4.4 , is 21.7±0.9(stat)-3.3+3.0(syst)±0.9(lumi)nb. The ratio of the single-diffractive to inclusive dijet yields, normalised per unit of ξ, is presented as a function of x, the longitudinal momentum fraction of the proton carried by the struck parton. The ratio in the kinematic region defined above, for x values in the range - 2.9 ≤ log 10x≤ - 1.6 , is R=(σjjpX/Δξ)/σjj=0.025±0.001(stat)±0.003(syst), where σjjpX and σjj are the single-diffractive and inclusive dijet cross sections, respectively. The results are compared with predictions from models of diffractive and nondiffractive interactions. Monte Carlo predictions based on the HERA diffractive parton distribution functions agree well with the data when corrected for the effect of soft rescattering between the spectator partons. © 2020, CERN for the benefit of the CMS and TOTEM collaborations
A Deep Neural Network for Simultaneous Estimation of b Jet Energy and Resolution
- Publication venue
- Publication date
- 01/01/2020
- Field of study
We describe a method to obtain point and dispersion estimates for the energies of jets arising from b quarks produced in proton–proton collisions at an energy of s=13TeV at the CERN LHC. The algorithm is trained on a large sample of simulated b jets and validated on data recorded by the CMS detector in 2017 corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 41 fb-1. A multivariate regression algorithm based on a deep feed-forward neural network employs jet composition and shape information, and the properties of reconstructed secondary vertices associated with the jet. The results of the algorithm are used to improve the sensitivity of analyses that make use of b jets in the final state, such as the observation of Higgs boson decay to b b ¯. © 2020, The Author(s)
Erratum to: Measurement of exclusive Υ photoproduction from protons in pPb collisions at s NN = 5.02 TeV (The European Physical Journal C, (2019), 79, 3, (277), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6774-8)
- Publication venue
- Publication date
- 01/01/2022
- Field of study
In this article the author name Luigi Calligaris was incorrectly written as A. Calligaris. The original article has been corrected. © CERN for the benefit of the CMS collaboration 2022