Esthetic treatment of peri-implant soft tissue defects: a case report of a modified surgical-prosthetic approach.

A major esthetic concern is soft tissue defects around implant restorations, which often result in an extra long prosthetic crown. This report describes a modified prosthetic-surgical approach to the treatment of peri-implant horizontal and vertical soft tissue defects in an esthetically demanding patient. One month before surgery, the implant crown restoration was removed, the preexisting implant abutment was reduced, and a short provisional crown, at the level of the homologous contralateral incisor, was applied. A bilaminar technique, consisting of an envelope coronally advanced flap covering two connective tissue grafts, was used to treat the soft tissue defects around the implant site. Four months after surgery, a new implant abutment and provisional crown were applied for soft tissue conditioning before the final impression. Nine months after surgery, the peri-implant soft tissue margin was 4 mm more coronal compared with baseline and at the same soft tissue margin level of the right central incisor. A 2.2-mm increase in buccal soft tissue thickness measured 1.5 mm apical to the soft tissue margin was accomplished. The emergence profile of the replaced tooth faithfully reproduced that of the healthy homologous contralateral central incisor. Two years after surgery, the soft tissue margin was stable and the esthetic appearance of the implant site was well maintained. This report demonstrates the possibility of fully correcting severe vertical and horizontal peri-implant soft tissue defects and achieving high patient satisfaction through a combined mucogingival and prosthetic treatment

Hand and ultrasonic instrumentation in combination with root-coverage surgery: a comparative controlled randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of vigorous root planing in the surgical treatment of gingival recession was recently questioned. The aim of the present randomized controlled split-mouth clinical study was to compare the effectiveness, in terms of root coverage, of hand and ultrasonic root instrumentation in combination with a coronally advanced flap for the treatment of isolated-type recession defects. METHODS:Eleven systemically and periodontally healthy subjects with bilateral recession defects (> or = 3 mm) of similar (< or = 1 mm) depth affecting contralateral teeth were enrolled in the study. Only Miller Class I gingival recession with no deep cervical abrasion or root caries/demineralization were included in the study. Control root exposures were treated with curets, whereas test roots were instrumented with ultrasonic piezoelectric devices. Randomization for test and control treatment was performed by a coin toss immediately prior to surgery. All recessions were treated with a coronally advanced flap surgical technique. The clinical reevaluation was made 6 months after surgery. RESULTS:The two approaches resulted in a high percentage of root coverage (95.4% in the control group and 84.2% in the test group) and complete root coverage (82% in the control group and 55% in the test teeth), with no statistically significant difference between them. Clinical attachment level gains were clinically significant in both groups (3.36 +/- 0.92 mm in the control group and 2.90 +/- 0.70 mm in the test group), with no statistically significant difference between them. The increase in keratinized tissue height was statistically significant in both groups (0.55 +/- 0.52 mm in the control group and 0.36 +/- 0.67 mm in the test group), with no difference between them. CONCLUSIONS:The present study failed to demonstrate any superiority, in terms of root-coverage results, for hand instruments over ultrasonic treatment of the root surface in combination with coronally advanced flap mucogingival surgery. Further studies of longer-term duration and larger sample size could help to establish the superiority of one form of root instrumentation in conjunction with root-coverage surgery

Esthetic evaluation and patient-centered outcomes in single-tooth implant rehabilitation in the esthetic area

Criteria for successful implants, in the rehabilitation of a single missing tooth in the esthetic area, should be determined by composite outcomes, including functional and esthetic aspects of soft tissues and the reconstruction, as well as patient-reported outcomes. This paper focuses on current methods in esthetic assessment and patient-centered/reported outcomes in single-tooth implant rehabilitation in the esthetic area. The relationship between subjective, patient-based esthetic evaluations and objective, professional-based esthetic evaluations is reviewed. In spite of increasing interest in the assessment of 'success' in implant dentistry, it is not yet possible to provide evidence-based conclusions because of the lack of consensus on a universal implant-supported crown esthetic index. There is also a need to standardize reporting of patient-centered outcomes in partially edentulous patients treated with implants

A novel surgical-prosthetic approach for soft tissue dehiscence coverage around single implant

The aim of the study was to evaluate soft-tissue coverage and patient aesthetic satisfaction of a novel surgical-prosthetic approach to soft tissue dehiscence (STD) around single endosseous implant. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients with buccal soft tissues dehiscence around single implants in the aesthetic area were consecutively enrolled. Treatment consisted in: removal of the implant supported crown, reduction in the implant abutment, coronally advanced flap in combination with connective tissue graft (CTG) and final restoration. The unrestored contralateral tooth normally positioned without recession defect was used as a reference. The soft tissue coverage and patient satisfaction were evaluated 1 year after the final restoration. RESULTS: One-year mean STD coverage was 96.3%, and complete coverage was achieved in 75% of the treated sites. The increase (1.54 \ub1 0.21 mm) in buccal soft tissue thickness (STT) at 1 year was significantly correlated with CTG thickness at time of the surgery. The mean difference between graft thickness and STT increase was 0.09 \ub1 0.14 mm, corresponding to the 5.8% of the original graft thickness. The aesthetic analysis showed a significant improvement between the baseline (median, 3.8; 95% CI, 2-4) and the 1-year (median, 8.0; 95% CI, 8-10) visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. CONCLUSION: The results from the present study demonstrated that the proposed bilaminar technique was effective in the coverage of buccal STD around single dental implant and the suggested prosthetic-surgical approach was aesthetically successful

Vertically Coronally Advanced Flap (V-CAF) to Increase Vestibule Depth in Mandibular Incisors

Treatment of gingival recessions affecting mandibular incisors is scarcely documented. Despite a shallow vestibule depth being considered a poor anatomical condition, it has never been measured nor deemed a clinical parameter affecting the outcome of root coverage procedures. This study describes a vertically and coronally advanced flap (V-CAF) + connective tissue graft (CTG) technique to obtain root coverage and increased vestibule depth in the treatment of gingival recessions affecting mandibular incisors. Twenty patients with single gingival recessions were treated. The results showed that V-CAF+CTG is effective in increasing residual vestibule depth and in reducing recession depth. Immediately after surgery, a vestibule-depth increase of 5.9 ± 1.2 mm was reported, which was statistically significant compared to baseline, and it remained stable after 12 months (4.8 ± 1.1 mm). The mean percentage of root coverage was 98.3% ± 5.2% for all treated recessions, and complete root coverage (CRC) was achieved in 90% of cases (18 of 20). V-CAF+CTG could be considered a successful technique in terms of vestibule depth increase and CRC for the treatment of single gingival recessions in the mandibular incisors

An exploratory clinical study evaluating safety and performance of a volume-stable collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap for single gingival recession treatment

Objective: To test the safety of a new volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX) in combination with coronally advanced flap (CAF) for the treatment of single gingival recession. Material and methods: Ten patients were treated for single RT1 gingival recession. Complete and mean root coverage, gingival thickness and keratinized tissue height, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and safety were assessed up to 180&nbsp;days. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the clinical parameters. Results: VCMX resulted to be safe with no serious adverse events in all patients. At 6&nbsp;months, root coverage was 96.7% with 90% of defects exhibiting complete coverage. There was an increase in mean width of keratinized tissue (KT) (0.4 \ub1 0.8&nbsp;mm) and in gingival thickness (GT) (0.4 \ub1 0.34&nbsp;mm); however, the difference was not statistically significant compared to baseline parameters. Pain perception and pain-killer consumption were low and decreasing further at 7&nbsp;days. Esthetic satisfaction for both patients and experts revealed excellent scores. Conclusions: VCMX is a safe and well-tolerated device for the treatment of single gingival recessions. In combination with CAF, it resulted in a high performance in terms of mean and complete root coverage, KT width, and GT increase. VCMX may reduce patient discomfort and post-operative morbidity. Clinical relevance: VCMX is a safe and stable substitute for the treatment of gingival recession in conjunction with coronally advanced technique

The connective tissue graft wall technique and enamel matrix derivative to improve root coverage and clinical attachment levels in Miller Class IV gingival recession.

Objective: This short communication reports on a novel digital technique designated - the "Fully Digital Technique (FDT)" - to take the impression of the peri-implant soft tissue and emergence profile with an intraoral scanner, digitally capturing both the three dimensional position of the implant platform and the coronal and gingival parts of the provisional retained restoration. Materials and methods: A first intraoral digital impression, which generated a standard triangulation language file (STL1), was taken using a standardized implant scanbody to detect the position of the implant. A second digital impression (STL2) with the provisional retained restoration in situ was performed in two steps: the first part of the scan captured all details of the vestibular and palatal sides of the provisional retained restoration and the adjacent teeth. The provisional retained restoration was then unscrewed, and the subgingival part of the restoration was scanned directly out of the mouth to determine its subgingival shape. STL1 and STL2 were imported into imaging software and superimposed using the "best fit" algorithm to achieve a new merged file (STL3) with the 3D implant position, the peri-implant mucosa, and emergence profile. The merged file was used to design the CAD/CAM customized abutment and to realize a stereolithographic model by 3D printing. Results: The STL superimposition of digital impressions of the implant position and the provisional retained restoration constitute a novel technique to obtain a single STL file with the implant position and its peri-implant mucosal architecture. Conclusions: FDT is a rapid digital approach for achieving all information of the peri-implant soft tissue and emergence profile directly from the provisional retained restoration. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S

Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a comparative short- and long-term controlled randomized clinical trial

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and aesthetic outcomes of two different surgical approaches for the treatment of deep gingival recession affecting the mandibular incisors. METHODS: Fifty patients with Miller class I and II gingival recessions (≥ 3 mm) in the lower incisors were enrolled. Twenty-five patients were randomly assigned to the control group and the other 25 patients to the test group. All defects were treated with the coronally advanced flap + connective tissue graft (CAF + CTG) and in the test group the labial submucosal tissue (LST) was removed. Post-operative morbidity was evaluated at 1 week. Clinical and aesthetic evaluations were made at 1 year. RESULTS: Statistically greater recession reduction, probability of CRC (adjusted OR 7.94 95% CI = 1.88-33.50, p = 0.0024) and greater increase in GT were observed in the test group. Greater graft exposure and increase in KTH were demonstrated in the control group. Better aesthetics outcomes were observed in the test group. No statistically significant between groups differences were demonstrated in patient analgesic assumption and post-operative discomfort and bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: LST removal during CAF + CTG surgery is indicated to provide better root coverage and aesthetic outcomes in the treatment of gingival recessions affecting the lower incisors

Predetermination of root coverage

BACKGROUND: A method to predetermine the maximum root coverage level (MRC) achievable with surgery was recently presented. The present study evaluates the predictability of such a method by comparing the predetermined MRC with that effectively achieved by means of root coverage surgical procedures. METHODS:A total of 50 patients with single and multiple recession defects were enrolled. MRC was predetermined by an independent periodontist by assessing the ideal height of the interdental papilla. The distance from the apical reference point of a stent (StRP) and the MRC was measured 7 days before root coverage surgery. A total of 135 Miller Class I, II, and III gingival recessions were treated with the coronally advanced flap (CAF) or with the subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG). The distance from StRP and the gingival margin (GM) was measured by another independent periodontist 15, 30, and 90 days after surgery. RESULTS:In 97 (71.8%) of 135 treated gingival recessions, the StRP-MRC distance coincided exactly with the StRP-GM distance. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the cases with exact predetermination between gingival recessions belonging to the maxilla or mandible and between gingival defects treated with CAF or SCTG. The StRP-MRC distance measured before surgery was greater in 24 recession defects (17.7%) and lower in 14 gingival recessions (10.3%) than the StRP-GM distance measured 90 days after surgery. More cases of underestimation and fewer cases with overestimation of the level of root coverage were found in the SCTG group compared to the CAF group. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS:The adopted method was effective in predetermining the position of the soft tissue margin 90 days after root coverage surgery. The cases with underestimation of the level of root coverage should be considered clinically and esthetically successful