6 research outputs found
Impact of Cardiac Computed Tomographic Angiography Findings on Planning of Cancer Therapy in Patients with Concomitant Structural Heart Disease
Background. Exclusion of underlying coronary artery disease (CAD) is essential in the diagnosis of chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy. Presence and severity of CAD can also impact the choice of therapy in cancer patients. The value of cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in this setting has not been reported. Methods. We collected data on the clinical presentation and indications for CCTA performed from January to December 2008 at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). All examinations were performed using a 64-detector scanner. CCTA results and subsequent treatment decisions were examined. Results. A total of 80 patients underwent CCTA during the study period for the following indications (not mutually exclusive): cardiomyopathy of unknown etiology in 33 pts (41.3%), chest pain in 32 (40.0%), abnormal stress test in 16 (20.0%), abnormal cardiac markers in 8 (10.0%), suspected cardiac mass or thrombus in 7 (8.8%). Chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy was diagnosed in 18 pts (22.5%). Severe CAD was detected in 22 pts (27.5%); due to concomitant advanced cancer or patient refusal, only 12 underwent coronary angiogram. Of these, 4 pts (5% of total) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. A total of 41 pts (51.3%) had their cancer management altered based on CCTA findings.
Conclusion. CCTA is useful in evaluating cancer pts with structural heart disease and can have an impact on the management of cancer and cardiac disease
Outcomes of Cancer Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Pericardiocentesis for Pericardial Effusion
AbstractBackgroundPericardial effusion (PE) is common in cancer patients, but the optimal therapeutic approach is not well defined. Percutaneous pericardiocentesis is less invasive than surgery, but its long-term effectiveness and safety have not been well documented.ObjectivesThe goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of cancer patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis for PE and assess the procedure’s safety in patients with thrombocytopenia.MethodsCancer patients who underwent percutaneous pericardiocentesis for PE between November 2009 and October 2014 at the MD Anderson Cancer Center were included. Procedure-related complications, effusion recurrence rate, and overall survival were analyzed.ResultsOf 1,645 cancer patients referred for PE, 212 (13%) underwent percutaneous pericardiocentesis. The procedure was successful in 99% of the cases, and there were no procedure-related deaths. Four patients had major procedure-related bleeding that did not vary by platelet count <50,000/μl or ≥50,000/μl (p = 0.1281). Patients with catheter drainage for 3 to 5 days had the lowest recurrence rate (10%). Median overall survival was 143 days; older age (i.e., >65 years), lung cancer, platelet count <20,000/μl, and malignant pericardial fluid were independently associated with poor prognosis. Lung cancer patients with proven malignant effusions had a significantly shorter median 1-year survival compared with those with nonmalignant effusions (16.2% vs. 49.0%, respectively; log-rank test p = 0.0101). A similar difference in 1-year survival was not observed in patients with breast cancer (40.2% vs. 40.0%; log-rank test p = 0.4170).ConclusionsPercutaneous pericardiocentesis with extended catheter drainage was safe and effective as the primary treatment for PE in cancer patients, including in those with thrombocytopenia. Malignant PE significantly shortened the survival outcome of patients with lung cancer but not those with breast cancer
Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
We describe a patient with asymptomatic apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (AHCM) who later developed cardiac arrhythmias, and briefly discuss the diagnostic modalities, differential diagnosis and treatment option for this condition. AHCM is a rare form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy which classically involves the apex of the left ventricle. AHCM can be an incidental finding, or patients may present with chest pain, palpitations, dyspnea, syncope, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, embolic events, ventricular fibrillation and congestive heart failure. AHCM is frequently sporadic, but autosomal dominant inheritance has been reported in few families. The most frequent and classic electrocardiogram findings are giant negative T-waves in the precordial leads which are found in the majority of the patients followed by left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. A transthoracic echocardiogram is the initial diagnostic tool in the evaluation of AHCM and shows hypertrophy of the LV apex. AHCM may mimic other conditions such as LV apical cardiac tumors, LV apical thrombus, isolated ventricular non-compaction, endomyocardial fibrosis and coronary artery disease. Other modalities, including left ventriculography, multislice spiral computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imagings are also valuable tools and are frequently used to differentiate AHCH from other conditions. Medications used to treat symptomatic patients with AHCM include verapamil, beta-blockers and antiarrhythmic agents such as amiodarone and procainamide. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator is recommended for high risk patients
Recommended from our members
Safety and Efficacy Results from CLI120-001 a Phase 1 Study in RR-AML and HR-MDS: Update from Higher Dose Levels
Background: RVU120, a first-in-class CDK8/19 kinase inhibitor, showed antileukemic activity mediated by inhibition of STAT5 phosphorylation in AML cell lines and patient-derived cells.Clinical activity in a population of patients with relapsed/refractory AML and HR-MDS with poor prognostic factors was shown in a currently ongoing phase 1 dose escalation study (NCT04021368) consistent with the preclinical evidence of both cytotoxic and erythroid and myeloid differentiation effects in cell and mouse models. Aims: The primary objective of the study is to determine the safety profile and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of RVU120 as a single agent in R/R AML and HR-MDS. Secondary objectives include the characterization of PK, antitumor activity, and exploratory pharmacodynamic (PD) effects. Methods: CLI120-001 is an open-label, multi-center, dose escalation study. RVU120 is administered orally every other day, for a total of 7 doses, in a 3-week treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse events are graded according to NCI-CTCAE v.5.0. DLTs are assessed at the completion of Cycle 1. Disease evaluation is performed according to Dohner 2017 and Cheson 2006 response criteria for AML and MDS respectively. Pharmacodynamic assessments (PD) include a flow cytometry assay to assess target engagement by evaluating changes in phosphorylated STAT5. Results: As of 26 Jul 2023, 31 patients received RVU120 at doses between 10 and 175 mg, median age 71 years, median of 3 prior lines of therapy. ECOG PS was 2 in 8 pts, 1 in 20 pts, and 0 in 3pts. No severe drug reactions, no DLT have been reported, with manageable nausea and vomiting being the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events. Twelve out of the 24 evaluable patients showed clinically relevant benefit. Four patients achieved a reduction of blasts to 18 months with nearly normal Hgb and Plts values. 2 patients with AML-MRC, with baseline RBC and Plt transfusion dependance (TD), became TI and reached normal Plts values. 1 patient with AML-MRC with RBC and Plt TD and severe neutropenia showed RBC and Plt TI and ANC recovery and is currently in C7 of treatment. A correlation between pSTAT5 inhibition and RVU120 exposure was observed. Conclusion: In the ongoing phase 1 trial, RVU120 shows clinical activity in both AML and HR-MDS, inducing RBC transfusion independence and blast reduction with a tolerable safety profile. Clearance of BM blasts including a formal CR were observed in patients treated at different dose levels. Relevant target inhibition is achieved from 110 mg onwards with expected higher pSTAT 5 inhibition with further dose escalation