Dupilumab suppresses relapsing chronic eosinophilic pneumonia with severe asthma

Dupilumab-induced hypereosinophilia is mediated by blockade of the IL-4/IL-13 pathway, which reduces eosinophil migration from peripheral blood. The increase in peripheral blood eosinophils may lead to chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP) and/or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, but a direct causal connection between dupilumab and eosinophilic lung diseases has not been established. A 33-year-old Japanese woman with bronchial asthma since age three was treated with fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol twice daily after several asthma exacerbations at age 17. Her course was complicated by CEP at age 33 which resolved without the need for systemic steroids. However, in the four months following resolution of her CEP, the patient had three asthma exacerbations, and a recurrence of CEP, with blood leukocytes of 8500/µL, of which 25.0% were eosinophils. She was treated with prednisolone 50 mg/day, but she could not continue this dose due to the onset of myalgia. Then she had relapsing CEP twice within three months. She was treated with prednisolone 15 mg/day for CEP, but she had persistent asthma for more than one month; dupilumab was added at 600 mg, followed by 300 mg every two weeks. In the first month of treatment with dupilumab, the patient’s asthma symptoms resolved completely, and she had only one relapse of CEP. In 12 months of follow-up, she had neither an asthma exacerbation nor another relapse of CEP. Dupilumab may be a promising treatment for patients with refractory asthma complicated by recurring CEP and undesirable steroid side effects

Tezepelumab improved chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in a Patient with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease

Introduction: Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) have more severe sinus disease than those without AERD. CRSwNP associated with type 2 inflammation and AERD can be difficult to control with standard medical therapy and sinus surgery. Case study: 74-year-old Japanese woman with chronic sinusitis since age 50 and asthma since age 60. At age 64, she began to experience asthma exacerbations and was started on short-term corticosteroid therapy with prednisolone. At age 70, she experienced urticaria, nasal congestion, and wheezing after taking an NSAID; based on an NSAID provocation test, we diagnosed the patient with AERD and CRSwNP. A diagnosis of severe eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis was also made based on the scoring system and algorithm used in the Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Results: Treatment with benralizumab (30 mg), formoterol–fluticasone combination via pressurized metered inhaler (1000 μg), and leukotriene receptor antagonist improved the asthma symptoms and exacerbations so the short-term prednisolone was stopped; however, nasal congestion and olfactory dysfunction (hyposmia) persisted, and peripheral blood eosinophil count (peak, 1500 cells/μL) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (peak, 42 ppb) became elevated. Swapping the benralizumab for monthly tezepelumab (210 mg) improved not only the asthma symptoms but also the nasal congestion, olfactory dysfunction, eosinophil count (<300 cells/μL), and fractional exhaled nitric oxide level [8ppb]. Conclusion: Changing from benralizumab to tezepelumab improved asthma symptoms, nasal obstruction, and olfactory dysfunction in elderly, female, Japanese patient with AERD and CRSwNP

Comparison of the slow‐pull and aspiration methods of endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration for next‐generation sequencing‐compatible tissue collection in non‐small cell lung cancer

Abstract Background Personalized treatment for non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has advanced rapidly, and elucidating the genetic changes that trigger this disease is crucial for appropriate treatment selection. Both slow‐pull and aspiration methods of endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA) are accepted methods for collecting samples suitable for next‐generation sequencing (NGS) to examine driver gene mutations and translocations in NSCLC. Here, we aimed to determine which of these two methods is superior for obtaining higher‐quality samples from patients with NSCLC. Methods Seventy‐one patients diagnosed with NSCLC via EBUS‐TBNA using the slow‐pull or aspiration (20‐mL negative pressure) methods between July 2019 and September 2022 were included. A total of 203 tissue samples from the 71 patients were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, and mounted on slides. The presence of tissue cores, degree of blood contamination, and number of tumor cells were compared between the groups. The success rate of NGS, using Oncomine Dx Target Test Multi‐CDx, was also compared between the groups. Results The slow‐pull method was associated with a higher yield of tissue cores, lower degree of blood contamination, and higher number of tumor cells than the aspiration method. The success rate of the NGS was also significantly higher for the slow‐pull group (95%) than for the aspiration group (68%). Conclusion Overall, these findings suggest that the slow‐pull method is a superior technique for EBUS‐TBNA to obtain high‐quality tissue samples for NGS. The slow‐pull method may contribute to the identification of driver gene mutations and translocations and facilitate personalized treatment of NSCLC