A comprehensive overview of major salivary gland ultrasonography in (suspected) primary Sjögren’s syndrome

Primary Sjögren’s syndrome is a chronic, systemic auto-immune disease characterized by inflammation of the lacrimal and salivary glands. This thesis demonstrates that major salivary gland ultrasonography is a promising non-invasive method to investigate salivary gland involvement in (suspected) Sjögren’s patients. Major salivary gland ultrasonography is able to predict the outcome of a salivary gland biopsy at group level, but it cannot fully replace the biopsy for each individual patient. The combination of a positive ultrasound and the presence of anti-SSA antibodies (in blood) predicts very well if a patient will be classified with Sjögren’s syndrome. For diagnostic purposes, it suffices to use a compact ultrasound scoring system, while for the division of classified Sjögren’s patients in subgroups, a more comprehensive scoring system is warranted. With the addition of salivary gland ultrasonography to the classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome, the accuracy is comparable. However, the feasibility increases since clinicians are able to choose from a wider array of tests. A detailed analyses was performed between three different methods that assess the involvement of the parotid gland, that is a biopsy, collection of saliva and ultrasonography. All three methods provide other (unique) information and are therefore complementary to each other. Finally, the efficacy and safety of treatment with abatacept has been investigated

Recent insights in the potential role of imaging modalities for diagnosing patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome

Within the last year, interesting developments regarding the assessment of salivary gland involvement in patients with clinical suspicion of, or diagnosed with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) have been performed. In this review various topics will be discussed, starting with the use of salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) for the detection of glandular swelling. Furthermore, other imaging modalities, besides B-mode SGUS, which differentiate between pSS patients and healthy controls will be highlighted. Moreover, storage of ultrasonographic images and videos will be discussed briefly, as will be some potential biases and pitfalls. Finally, efforts that have been made to make incorporation of SGUS into the most recent classification criteria possible will be discussed, as well as the important steps that have been taken to develop a new semi-quantitative scoring system for the assessment of salivary gland involvement in patients with suspected or confirmed pSS

Imaging in Primary Sjogren's Syndrome

Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by dysfunction and lymphocytic infiltration of the salivary and lacrimal glands. Besides the characteristic sicca complaints, pSS patients can present a spectrum of signs and symptoms, which challenges the diagnostic process. Various imaging techniques can be used to assist in the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of pSS patients. Developments in imaging techniques provide new opportunities and perspectives. In this descriptive review, we discuss imaging techniques that are used in pSS with a focus on the salivary glands. The emphasis is on the contribution of these techniques to the diagnosis of pSS, their potential in assessing disease activity and disease progression in pSS, and their contribution to diagnosing and staging of pSS-associated lymphomas. Imaging findings of the salivary glands will be linked to histopathological changes in the salivary glands of pSS patients

Incorporation of Salivary Gland Ultrasonography Into the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Criteria for Primary Sjögren's Syndrome

Objective: To assess whether the addition of salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) or replacement of current criteria items by SGUS influences the performance of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome. Methods: Included were consecutive patients with complete data on all ACR/EULAR items (n = 243) who underwent SGUS in our primary Sjögren's syndrome expertise center. Clinical diagnosis by the treating physician was used as the gold standard. Separate analyses were performed for patients who underwent labial or parotid gland biopsies. The average score for hypoechogenic areas in 1 parotid and 1 submandibular gland was determined (range 0–3). Next, performance of the ACR/EULAR criteria was evaluated after addition of SGUS or replacement of current items by SGUS. Results: Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an optimal cutoff value of ≥1.5 for SGUS. The optimal weight for SGUS positivity was 1. Cutoff for ACR/EULAR fulfilment remained ≥4. In patients who underwent a labial gland biopsy (n = 124), the original criteria showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.965, sensitivity of 95.9%, and specificity of 92.2%. After the addition of SGUS, the AUC was 0.966, with a sensitivity of 97.3% and specificity of 90.2%. In patients who underwent a parotid gland biopsy (n = 198), similar results were found. Sensitivity of the criteria decreased substantially when SGUS replaced salivary gland biopsy or anti-SSA antibodies, while performance remained equal when SGUS replaced the ocular staining score, Schirmer's test, or unstimulated whole saliva flow. Conclusion: Validity of the ACR/EULAR criteria remains high after incorporation of SGUS. With SGUS, clinicians are offered a larger array of tests to evaluate fulfillment of the ACR/EULAR criteria

Clinical Phenotyping of Primary Sjogren Syndrome Patients Using Salivary Gland Ultrasonography:Data From the RESULT Cohort

Objective. To investigate salivary gland ultrasound (SGUS) abnormalities in relation to clinical phenotype and patient characteristics, disease activity, and disease damage in patients with primary Sjogren syndrome (pSS). Methods. Consecutive outpatients included in our REgistry of Sjogren Syndrome LongiTudinal (RESULT) cohort were selected. Patients with pSS who were included were classified according to the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria and underwent full ultrasonographic examination (However score 0-48) at baseline. Total SGUS scores of >= 15 were considered positive. Patient characteristics, disease activity, and disease damage were compared between the different SGUS groups. Results. In total, 172 of 186 patients with pSS were eligible, of whom 136 (79%) were SGUS positive. Compared with patients who were SGUS negative, SGUS-positive patients had significantly longer disease duration, higher EULAR Sjogren Syndrome Disease Activity Index, higher Sjogren Syndrome Disease Damage Index, and were more likely to have a positive parotid gland biopsy, anti-SSA/SSB antibodies, and abnormal unstimulated whole saliva (UWS) and ocular staining score (OSS), and higher levels of IgG and rheumatoid factor. Regarding patient-reported outcome measurements (PROM), patients who were SGUS positive scored significantly lower on the EULAR Sjogren Syndrome Patient-Reported Index for fatigue and pain, and more often found their disease state acceptable compared with patients who were SGUS negative. SGUS total score showed significant associations with various clinical and serological variables, and with PROM. Highest associations were found for UWS (p = -0.551) and OSS (p = 0.532). Conclusion. Patients who were SGUS positive show a distinct clinical phenotype in all aspects of the disease compared with patients who were SGUS negative: clinical, functional, serological, and PROM. SGUS could be a helpful tool in selecting patients for clinical trials and estimating treatment need

Histopathology, salivary flow and ultrasonography of the parotid gland:three complementary measurements in primary Sjögren's syndrome

OBJECTIVE: The involvement of salivary glands in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) can be assessed in different ways: histopathology, salivary flow and ultrasonography. To understand the relative value of these different approaches, it is crucial to understand the relationship between them. As we routinely perform these three modalities in the parotid gland for disease evaluation, our aim was to investigate the construct validity between these modalities in one and the same gland. METHODS: Consecutive sicca patients underwent a multidisciplinary diagnostic work-up including parotid gland biopsy, collection of parotid gland-specific saliva and parotid gland ultrasonography. Patients who were classified as pSS according to the ACR-EULAR criteria were included. Construct validity was assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The 41 included pSS patients completed a full work-up within mean time interval of 2.6 months. Correlations between histopathological features and stimulated parotid salivary flow were fair (ρ=-0.123 for focus score, and ρ=-0.259 for percentage of CD45+ infiltrate). Likewise, poor correlations were observed between stimulated parotid salivary flow and parotid ultrasonography (ρ=-0.196). Moderate to good associations were found between the histopathological items focus score and percentage of CD45+ infiltrate, with parotid ultrasound scores (total ultrasound score: ρ = 0.510 and ρ = 0.560; highest for homogeneity: ρ = 0.574 and ρ = 0.633). CONCLUSION: Although pSS associated ultrasonographic findings did correlate with histopathological features, the three modalities that evaluate salivary gland involvement assess different (or at best partly related) constructs. Therefore, histopathology, salivary flow and ultrasonography are complementary measurements and cannot directly replace each other in the work-up of pSS

Long-term abatacept treatment for 48 weeks in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome:The open-label extension phase of the ASAP-III trial

Objective: To investigate treatment efficacy of long-term abatacept treatment in pSS patients. Methods: The single-centre ASAP-III trial consisted of two phases: the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase (1:1 randomisation) from baseline to week 24, of which results have been published previously, and the open-label extension phase from week 24 to 48, in which all patients received abatacept. Main inclusion criteria were fulfilment of the AECG criteria, positive gland biopsy, disease duration = 5. Long-term treatment effects of abatacept on clinical, patient-reported, glandular and laboratory outcome measures were assessed in patients treated with abatacept from baseline to week 48. Furthermore, Composite of Relevant Endpoints for Sj_ogren's Syndrome (CRESS) response (response on >= 3 of 5 items) was analysed. Results: In patients on abatacept treatment for 48 weeks (n = 40), median ESSDAI improved from baseline 14.0 (IQR 9.0 - 16.8) to 4.0 (2.0 - 8.0) at week 48 (p < 0.001), with 50% of patients reaching low disease activity (ESSDAI < 5) at week 48. Median ESSPRI improved from 7.0 (IQR 5.4-7.7) to 5.0 (3.7-6.7) (p < 0.001). Significant improvement was also seen in dry eye and laboratory tests. Combining response at multiple clinically relevant items, 73% of patients were CRESS responders at week 48. Additional improvement was seen between week 24 and week 48 of abatacept treatment. Conclusion: In the open-label extension phase of the ASAP-III trial, improvement was seen up to 48 weeks of abatacept treatment in clinical, patient-reported, dry eye and laboratory outcomes. The majority of patients were CRESS responders at week 48. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abatacept treatment for patients with early active primary Sjogren's syndrome:a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (ASAP-III study)

Background: Several small open-label studies have suggested efficacy of abatacept—a co-stimulation inhibitor—in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome. These promising results warranted further evaluation. We therefore aimed to further assess the safety and efficacy of abatacept compared with placebo in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome. Methods: We did a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial at the University Medical Center Groningen (Groningen, Netherlands). We included patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome fulfilling the American–European Consensus Group criteria, aged 18 years or older, with positive salivary gland biopsies, time from diagnosis of 7 years or less, and a European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) score of 5 or more. Independent pharmacists randomly allocated patients (1:1) to either the abatacept group or placebo group using a computer-generated sequence stratified by previous use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Patients received at-home subcutaneous injections of abatacept (125 mg) or placebo once a week for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in ESSDAI score at week 24. Efficacy was analysed in patients who received at least one drug dose and for whom post-baseline data were collected. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one drug dose. Findings: Between Aug 14, 2014, and Aug 23, 2018, 580 patients were reviewed for eligibility, of which 80 patients were randomly assigned to receive study treatment. Efficacy was analysed in 40 patients receiving abatacept and 39 patients receiving placebo (one patient in this group was lost to follow-up). The primary outcome did not significantly differ between the treatment groups. The adjusted mean difference in ESSDAI score at week 24 between the abatacept group and placebo group was −1·3 (95% CI −4·1 to 1·6). No deaths or treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. In 38 (95%) of 40 patients in the abatacept group, 103 adverse events occurred, including one serious adverse event and 46 infections. In 38 (95%) of 40 patients in the placebo group, 87 adverse events occurred, including four serious adverse events and 49 infections. Interpretation: On the basis of this trial, we cannot recommend abatacept treatment as standard of care to reduce systemic disease activity in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome. Further studies should evaluate whether patients with specific clinical manifestations and biological characteristics might benefit from abatacept treatment. Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb