3 research outputs found

    Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Ulnar-Sided Wrist Pain

    No full text
    PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ulnar-sided wrist pain is a challenging diagnostic workup. A thorough and complete physical examination followed by appropriate radiographic studies can help the clinician diagnose and treat these conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research has been focused on diagnostic modalities such as arthroscopy and high-resolution MRI. Ulnar-sided wrist pain is a challenging clinical workup that must be approached systematically with the aid of adjunctive diagnostic modalities

    Retrograde Intramedullary Screw Fixation for Metacarpal Fractures: A Systematic Review.

    No full text
    Common forms of fixation of metacarpal fractures have historically included percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation, plates and screws, and, more recently, intramedullary screw fixation. Retrograde intramedullary screws (RISs) are a novel modality first described 10 years ago. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the published literature assessing outcomes of RIS fixation for metacarpal fractures and create a complication profile for this novel technique. A comprehensive literature search was performed using electronic databases for both clinical and biomechanical studies in relation to RIS fixation published from 2000 to 2020. A total of 19 studies (13 clinical and 6 biomechanical) met the inclusion criteria. The clinical studies examined 603 metacarpal fractures and demonstrated adequate functional outcomes in terms of grip strength, total active motion, and time to return to work. The biomechanical studies examined 80 metacarpal fractures, finding that load to failure in RISs was often equal to or higher than Kirschner wires but less than plate and screws. The complication rate in reviewed studies was 2.8%, with the most prevalent complications being stiffness and extension lag. RIS use in metacarpal fractures appears to provide adequate stability with satisfactory clinical outcomes and minimal complications, although more high-quality studies are needed to fully examine this modality

    Radiographic Comparison of Forearm Symmetry in Healthy Individuals and its Importance in the Diagnosis of Longitudinal Radioulnar Dissociation.

    No full text
    PURPOSE: Longitudinal radioulnar dissociation (LRD) is an injury often missed upon initial presentation. A recent study examined a radiographic screening test in cadavers that showed increased interosseous distance when the interosseous ligament (IOL) was divided. For this test to be clinically useful, it is necessary for uninjured forearms to have similar interosseous spaces. The purpose of this study was to determine the typical differences between right and left interosseous spaces of healthy individuals. METHODS: Anterior-posterior x-rays of bilateral forearms in maximum supination of 28 surgical residents with no history of injury were obtained. These images were uploaded into a picture archiving and communication system and then digitized. The length of the radius was measured (Xr). The maximum interosseous distance (Dmax) between the radius and ulna as well as the interosseous distance at a location 0.3 Xr from the distal radioulnar joint was measured. The right and left arm distances were compared. Also, an outlier analysis was used to evaluate forearm rotational asymmetry between right and left arms. RESULTS: The outlier analysis revealed two sets of forearm x-rays were rotationally different compared to the rest of the group due to asymmetric arm positioning; these data were excluded from the analysis. The average difference in Dmax was 1.7 mm (standard deviation [SD] 1.5) between right and left arms, and this was found at a position of 0.28 Xr on average. The difference in interosseous distance measured at a fixed location 0.3 Xr was 1.6 mm (SD 1.5). No significant difference was found between the paired right and left arms for Dmax or at 0.3 Xr. CONCLUSIONS: There does not appear to be any significant difference between the maximum interosseous distance of right and left arms in healthy individuals. Therefore, analyzing bilateral forearm x-rays may be a simple LRD screening test. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the degree of normal variation in the forearm bone spacing might inform evaluation of abnormal forearm bone alignment resulting from LRD
    corecore