Effect of intravenous amiodarone on QT and T peak–T end dispersions in patients with nonischemic heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization-defibrillator therapy and electrical storm

Background: The effect of intravenous amiodarone on spatial and transmural dispersion of ventricular repolarization in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains unclear. Methods: We studied 14 patients with nonischemic heart failure who received CRT with a defibrillator, experienced electrical storm and were treated with intravenous amiodarone. Each patient underwent 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) and 187-channel repolarization interval-difference mapping electrocardiography (187-ch RIDM-ECG) before and during the intravenous administration of amiodarone infusion. Results: A recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia was observed in 2 patients during the early period of intravenous amiodarone therapy. Intravenous amiodarone increased the corrected QT interval (from 470±52 ms to 508±55 ms, P=0.003), but it significantly decreased the QT dispersion (from 107±35 ms to 49±27 ms, P=0.001), T peak–T end (Tp–e) dispersion (from 86±17 ms to 28±28 ms, P=0.001), and maximum inter-lead difference between corrected Tp–e intervals as measured by using the 187-ch RIDM-ECG (from 83±13 ms to 50±19 ms, P=0.001). Conclusions: Intravenous amiodarone suppressed the electrical storm and decreased the QT and Tp–e dispersions in patients treated by using CRT with a defibrillator

Successful transjugular extraction of a lead in front of the anterior scalene muscle by using snare technique

The incidence of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection is increasing. We report a case of and successful device removal in a 79-year-old man with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infection. Right phrenic nerve paralysis was evident on chest radiography. The lead was in front of the anterior scalene muscle, close to the left phrenic nerve. Therefore, extraction carried a risk of bilateral phrenic nerve paralysis. The lead was successfully extracted from the right internal jugular vein by using the snare technique. No complications occurred, and the extraction was successful

Nationwide survey of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: The Japanese catheter ablation registry of atrial fibrillation (J-CARAF)–A report on periprocedural oral anticoagulants

Background: Catheter ablation has become an established therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). To obtain a perspective on the current status of this therapy in Japan, the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society (JHRS) conducted a nationwide survey, the Japanese Catheter Ablation Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (J-CARAF). In this study, we focused on whether periprocedural use of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) was related with excessive thromboembolic or bleeding complications. Methods: Using an online questionnaire, JHRS requested electrophysiology centers in Japan to register the data of patients who underwent AF ablations in September 2011, March 2012, and September 2012. We compared the clinical profiles and ablation data, including the incidence of complications among patients in whom warfarin, a NOAC or neither was used as a periprocedural anticoagulant. Results: A total of 179 centers submitted data relating to 3373 patients (62.2±10.6 years). Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) was observed in 64.4% of patients. Warfarin, as a periprocedural oral anticoagulant, was used by 53.6% (1808/3373) of patients. A NOAC was given to 541 subjects (dabigatran: 504 [16.1%], rivaroxaban: 37 [1.1%]). In the remaining 1024 patients (30.4%), no periprocedural oral anticoagulants (OACs) were used. The proportion of PAF in warfarin-treated patients (61.1%) was significantly lower than that in NOAC-treated patients (70.1%, p<0.01) or in patients not treated with an OAC (67.4%, p<0.01). Patients treated with uninterrupted warfarin therapy were associated with significantly higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores. A total of 158 complications occurred in 151 subjects (4.5%). The incidence of complications in NOAC-treated patients (14/541 [2.6%]) was lower than that in patients receiving uninterrupted warfarin therapy (4.8%, p<0.05). The incidence of pericardial effusion in NOAC-treated patients (0.7%) was lower than in warfarin-treated patients (2.6%, p<0.05). The difference in the periprocedural anticoagulant strategy was not related to the frequency of other bleeding events. Cerebral infarction occurred in one patient from each patient group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that NOACs are safe for use as substitutes for warfarin without causing excessive increases in the rates of thromboembolic or bleeding complications

Safety, efficacy, and reliability evaluation ofa novel small-diameter defibrillation lead: Global LEADR pivotal trial results.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators last longer, and interest in reliable leads with targeted lead placement is growing. The OmniaSecure defibrillation lead is a novel, small-diameter, catheter-delivered lead designed for targeted placement, based on the established SelectSecure SureScan MRI Model 3830 lumenless pacing lead platform. OBJECTIVE: This trial assessed safety and efficacy of the OmniaSecure defibrillation lead. METHODS: The worldwide LEADR pivotal clinical trial enrolled patients indicated for de novo implantation of a primary or secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator, all of whom received the study lead. The primary efficacy end point was successful defibrillation at implantation per protocol. The primary safety end point was freedom from study lead-related major complications at 6 months. The primary efficacy and safety objectives were met if the lower bound of the 2-sided 95% credible interval was \u3e88% and \u3e90%, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 643 patients successfully received the study lead, and 505 patients have completed 12-month follow-up. The lead was placed in the desired right ventricular location in 99.5% of patients. Defibrillation testing at implantation was completed in 119 patients, with success in 97.5%. The Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from study lead-related major complications was 97.1% at 6 and 12 months. The trial exceeded the primary efficacy and safety objective thresholds. There were zero study lead fractures and electrical performance was stable throughout the mean follow-up of 12.7 ± 4.8 months (mean ± SD). CONCLUSION: The OmniaSecure lead exceeded prespecified primary end point performance goals for safety and efficacy, demonstrating high defibrillation success and a low occurrence of lead-related major complications with zero lead fractures