Elderly patients with multiple myeloma: Towards a frailty approach?

Purpose of review To describe how to better identify frail multiple myeloma patients and to treat them appropriately. Recent findings Proteasome inhibitors, such as bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib, and immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide, have significantly improved the outcome of multiple myeloma patients in the last decade. However, both in clinical trials and in daily clinical practice, elderly multiple myeloma patients have shown lesser benefit. This is mainly due to less stringent use of proteasome inhibitors and IMiDs, increased toxicity, and subsequent early discontinuation of therapy in elderly. Summary Multiple myeloma typically affects elderly patients. Approximately one-Third of patients are older than 75 years at diagnosis. Moreover, at least 30% are frail, both due to disease-related symptoms and (agerelated) decline in physical capacity, presence of comorbidities, frailty, polypharmacy, nutritional status, and cognitive impairment. Treatment regimens that are investigated in clinical trials for transplant-ineligible patients have largely been investigated in fit, rather than frail patients, the latter being typically excluded or highly underrepresented therein. Data on the feasibility and efficacy of current standards of care are therefore lacking in frail patients. Preliminary data suggest a higher toxicity and discontinuation rate, loss of efficacy, and impaired quality of life in frail patients. Geriatric assessment helps to identify frail patients according to their functional and cognitive status. Both the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG)-frailty index and Revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index constitute recently proposed algorithms that easily identify intermediate-fit and frail patients. Ongoing and future clinical trials, specifically designed for frail patients, will hopefully define frailty-directed treatment selection

Intensive Chemotherapy with Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation During a 10-Year Period in 64 Patients with Germ Cell Tumor

AbstractDespite gratifying cure rates in germ cell tumors, conventional-dose chemotherapy achieves long-term remissions in less than 50% of patients at high risk. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous (auto) peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) has shown impressive remission rates in high-risk and relapsed germ cell tumors. We report on 64 consecutive patients with high- (n = 39), intermediate- (n = 18), and refractory or relapsed low- (n = 7) risk germ cell tumors who underwent auto-PBSCT between January 1993 and February 2003. PBSCTs were performed as a single (n = 40) or repeated (n = 24) transplantation using either etoposide, ifosfamide, and carboplatin (n = 80) or related protocols (paclitaxel, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide [n = 7]; carboplatin, etoposide, thiotepa [n = 4]). With a median follow-up of 6 years, estimated 2- and 5-year overall survivals were 77.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 66.7-87.7) and 73.1% (95% CI 61.7-84.5), respectively. We observed unfavorable results in those patients showing refractoriness to cisplatin (hazard ratio 20.36; 95% CI 6.64-62.47) or no response to induction chemotherapy (hazard ratio 10.67; 95% CI 1.37-83.37). Auto-PBSCT was well tolerated, showed objective antitumor activity, and achieved long-term survival in patients at high risk and with relapse. Our data suggest that auto-PBSCT can increase response rates and may improve the outcome in these patients

Marrow versus Blood-Derived Stem Cell Grafts for Allogeneic Transplantation from Unrelated Donors in Patients with Active Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplasia

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are increasingly used as the graft source in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. We compared long-term outcome after unrelated donor transplantation of 85 consecutive patients with acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome regarding disease status (early disease [CR1, refractory anemia); n = 25 and advanced/active disease [>CR1, >refractory anemia]; n = 60) who were treated with conventional conditioning regimens followed by bone marrow (BM) or PBSC grafts. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis consisted mainly of cyclosporine A, short-course methotrexate, and anti-T-lymphocyte globulin. After a median follow-up of 118 months (68-174), the 10-year event-free survival rate after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) was 54.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.7%-69.8%), and after bone marrow transplantation (BMT), it was 27.9% (14.5%-41.3%; P < .004). In the advanced/active disease group, the 10-year event-free survival rate after PBSCT was 50% (30.8%-69.2%), and after BMT, it was 23.5% (9.3%-37.8%; P < .007). Non relapse mortality was less after PBSCT than BMT (14.3% vs 30.2%), respectively. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, PBSCT showed a better overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.79; P = .007) compared to BMT; unfavorable/unknown prognostic impact cytogenetic abnormalities were an adverse factor for all patients (HR, 2.202; 95% CI, 1.19-4.06; P = .011). In patients with advanced disease, the use of PBSCs showed a significant favorable outcome via multivariate analysis (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.24-0.99; P = .046). Outcome of acute myelogenous leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome after unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation is adversely affected by cytogenetic abnormalities and state of remission at hematopoietic cell transplantation. PBSC as a graft source has a significant favorable influence on survival

Functional cure and long-term survival in multiple myeloma: how to challenge the previously impossible

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease with survival ranging from months to decades. The goal of ‘cure’ remains elusive for most patients, but has been shown to be possible, with durable remission and a transition to a plateau phase (analogous to monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance/smoldering Myeloma (MGUS/SMM)). Two representative cases set the stage to illustrate how this might be possible and what still needs to be determined to achieve functional disease control over a prolonged period. Several developments have emerged, such as improved diagnostics including the definitions and use of SLiM-CRAB criteria and MRD with whole genome- /single-cell-sequencing as well as other correlates to better understand disease biology. These advances enable earlier detection, more accurate risk stratification and improved personalized treatment strategies by facilitating analysis of genetic alterations and clonal heterogeneity. Whole genome sequencing may also identify driver mutations and modes of resistance to targets like immunotherapies (IOs) as well as other targeted therapies. Today, induction with a CD38 antibody (CD38mAb), proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and dexamethasone, potentially followed by ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance, can be considered standard of care for transplant-eligible (TE) newly diagnosed (NDMM) patients. Whether prolonged disease control and functional cure can be achieved in non-transplant eligible (NTE) patients is currently emerging as a distinct possibility: data from phase III trials that incorporate a CD38mAb into the treatment of NTE NDMM patients demonstrate impressive MRD negativity rates that appear sustained over several years. While the long-term durability of CAR-Ts, bi-specific antibodies and other IOs are evaluated, several clinical trials are now investigating their role in frontline treatment for TE and NTE patients. These will address whether CAR-Ts will replace ASCT and whether such IOs will represent a truly curative option. We conclude that whilst cure remains elusive, the concept of operational or functional cure provides a new benchmark to strive for and is an emerging area of active and potentially achievable clinical research for MM