Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy for a solid pseudopapillary tumor in a ten-year-old child

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy (Whipple resection) in children is feasible though rarely indicated. In several pediatric malignancies of the pancreas, however, it may be the only curative strategy [1]. With the emergence of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy as at least a clinically equivalent alternative to open surgery [2], it remains to be determined whether the pediatric population may potentially benefit from this minimally invasive procedure. Here we present, for the first time, a video of setup and surgical technique of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in a child. METHODS: A 10-year-old girl presented with complaints of fullness and abdominal pain in the upper quadrants. Investigations including a diffusion-weighted, pancreatic MR scan suggested the diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary tumor (Frantz's tumor). The patient was considered for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. RESULTS: After anesthesia, the patient was placed supine on a split-leg table. Trocar placement was adjusted to accommodate the child's length and body weight, according to pre-operatively calculated positions that would allow for maximum working space and minimize inadvertent collision between the robotic arms. The da Vinci Si surgical robot was positioned in-line towards the surgical target and all four robotic arms were docked, while two additional laparoscopic ports were placed for tableside assistance. After standard pancreatoduodenectomy, a conventional loop reconstruction was performed including an end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy with duct-to-mucosa technique and stapled side-to-side gastrojejunostomy. We suggest that in this patient group, pylorus preserving pancreatoduodenectomy with end-to-side duodenojejunostomy may be a suitable alternative. Postoperative recovery was complicated by delayed gastric emptying but otherwise unremarkable. Hospital length of stay was 12 days. Final pathology demonstrated a solid pseudopapillary tumor with negative surgical margins. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the feasibility of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in children. Essential elements of this procedure are a well-running robotic pancreatic surgery program as well as careful preoperative port placement planning

Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy for a solid pseudopapillary tumor in a ten-year-old child

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy (Whipple resection) in children is feasible though rarely indicated. In several pediatric malignancies of the pancreas, however, it may be the only curative strategy [1]. With the emergence of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy as at least a clinically equivalent alternative to open surgery [2], it remains to be determined whether the pediatric population may potentially benefit from this minimally invasive procedure. Here we present, for the first time, a video of setup and surgical technique of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in a child. METHODS: A 10-year-old girl presented with complaints of fullness and abdominal pain in the upper quadrants. Investigations including a diffusion-weighted, pancreatic MR scan suggested the diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary tumor (Frantz's tumor). The patient was considered for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. RESULTS: After anesthesia, the patient was placed supine on a split-leg table. Trocar placement was adjusted to accommodate the child's length and body weight, according to pre-operatively calculated positions that would allow for maximum working space and minimize inadvertent collision between the robotic arms. The da Vinci Si surgical robot was positioned in-line towards the surgical target and all four robotic arms were docked, while two additional laparoscopic ports were placed for tableside assistance. After standard pancreatoduodenectomy, a conventional loop reconstruction was performed including an end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy with duct-to-mucosa technique and stapled side-to-side gastrojejunostomy. We suggest that in this patient group, pylorus preserving pancreatoduodenectomy with end-to-side duodenojejunostomy may be a suitable alternative. Postoperative recovery was complicated by delayed gastric emptying but otherwise unremarkable. Hospital length of stay was 12 days. Final pathology demonstrated a solid pseudopapillary tumor with negative surgical margins. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the feasibility of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in children. Essential elements of this procedure are a well-running robotic pancreatic surgery program as well as careful preoperative port placement planning

Minimizing blood loss in liver transplantation: Progress through research and evolution of techniques

Blood loss during liver transplantation has long been recognized as an important cause of morbidity and, especially in the early days, also mortality. It is well known that blood transfusions are associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, such as infections, pulmonary complications, protracted recovery, and a higher rate of reoperations. Many studies have been performed during the past decades to elucidate the mechanisms of increased blood loss in liver transplantation. In the late 1980s, primary hyperfibrinolysis was identified as an important mechanism of bleeding during liver transplantation. This has provided the scientific basis for the use of antifibrinolytic drugs in liver transplant recipients. Several randomized, controlled studies have shown the efficacy of these compounds in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements during liver transplantation. In addition, increasing experience and improvements in surgical technique, anesthesiological care and better graft preservation methods have contributed to a steady decrease in blood transfusion requirements in most liver transplant programs. Several centers are now reporting liver transplantation without any need for blood transfusion in up to 30% of their patients. Despite these improvements, most patients undergoing liver transplantation still require blood transfusions that have a negative impact on outcome, emphasizing the need for further attempts to control blood loss by surgeons and anesthesiologists. This paper provides an overview of the clinical and research developments, which have contributed to a reduction in blood loss and transfusion requirements, resulting in an important reduction in morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation during the last two decades

Robotic liver resection of segment 7: A step-by-step description of the technique

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is increasingly employed in complex procedures such as liver resection. Minor resections of the posterosuperior segments might benefit in particular from a robotic approach, since the size of the incision dominates the postoperative recovery rather than the extent of the resection [1]. We aimed to provide a standardized, step-wise guide to robotic liver resection of segment 7. METHODS: This video illustrates, step-by-step, robotic segment 7 resection. Patients are placed in left lateral position, slight anti-Trendelenburg. Three robotic ports are used and one conventional laparoscopic port is placed for bedside assistance. Next, segment 7 is mobilized. Intraoperative ultrasound is used to delineate the tumor and ensure a safe oncologic margin. The EndoWrist ® One™ Vessel Sealer (Extend) (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is used for transection of the hepatic parenchyma, combined with a bipolar Maryland Forceps (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, California, USA). Hem-o-lok clips (Teleflex Inc., Morrisville, NC, USA) or laparoscopic staplers (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) are used to control the hepatic pedicle. A pringle manoeuvre is applied when deemed appropriate. To ensure hemostasis and biliostasis, TachoSil (Takeda Nederland b.v. Takeda, Zurich, Switzerland) is applied to the resection surface. The specimen is extracted through an enlarged trocar incision. RESULTS: This video illustrates robotic liver resection of segment 7 in a 72-year-old male with a past medical history of colorectal cancer. New, resectable liver metastases were detected during follow-up. The procedure was completed fully robotically. No postoperative complications occurred and the patient was discharged on postoperative day one. CONCLUSION: This video provides a step-by-step guide to robotic liver resection of segment 7