The position of a duodenal diverticulum in the area of the major duodenal papilla and its potential clinical implications

Background: Although duodenal diverticula are associated with less frequent pathology than the colonic diverticula in the large intestine, their periampullary position may have significant clinical implications. The aim of the study was to identify any possible correlation between the type of localisation of the major duodenal papilla, duodenal diverticula, and some particular clinical issues. Materials and methods: In total, 628 patients (408 females and 220 males; aged 21–91 years), who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: a study group comprising 66 (10.5%) patients with periampullary position of diverticula (group A), and a control group comprising 562 (89.5%) patients without diverticula (group B). Results: A duodenal diverticulum was diagnosed in the periampullary position in 66/628 (10.5%) patients: 41 women (aged 52–91 years) and 25 men (aged 54–83 years). Conclusions: Three types of localisation were observed for the major duodenal papilla with regard to the diverticula, with the most common type being next to each other (type III). In patients with diverticula, similar frequencies of gallstone occurrence are observed in men and women. Patients with papilla in the diverticulum who underwent cholecystectomy are more prone to develop lithiasis

Clinical, emotional and social factors associated with quality of life in chronic pancreatitis.

Background: In chronic pancreatitis (CP), a debilitating, progressive and incurable disease, patients' wellbeing is considerably impaired, but the different factors affecting quality of life (QoL), have not been identified yet. Methods: 69 patients with CP were evaluated (M/F 55/14; mean age 46.6 +/- 10.05 years). Different degrees of pancreatic damage were defined using the Cambridge classification; pain intensity and frequency were assessed using pain index. QoL was measured using EORTC QLQ-C30 and the PAN26 questionnaire. Although developed for pancreatic cancer, the C30/PAN26 has been validated for chronic pancreatitis.Results: Digestive symptoms, financial difficulties, fear of future health and general pain scales showed considerable effects of CP on QoL. We observed significant negative correlation between mean QoL scores and pain index in almost all domains (p < 0.001, p < 0.05). Pain intensity affects QoL scales more often than pain frequency. BMI correlated positively with QoL in global health status, altered bowel habits, body image and satisfaction with health care domains (p < 0.01, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Pain index, BMI, Cambridge classification and disease duration are the most important factors adversely affecting QoL in CP. Measurement of QoL is essential in the disease management and improves the knowledge of psychosocial functioning of these patients. and IAP