[Risk factors associated with cognitive impairment in aged: Cross-sectional study]

<p><strong>Abstract </strong></p><p><strong>Background:</strong> With the increase in life expectancy, conditions related to older age have increased in incidence, one of these pathologies is Cognitive Impairment (CI), which has a prevalence of up to 28%, conditions that increase the presence of CI are known. However, there is controversy about the factors that increase the risk of CI. </p><p><strong>Objective:</strong> To determine the factors associated with cognitive impairment in older adults. <strong>Material and methods:</strong> We conducted a cross-sectional, analytical, observational, retroprolective study that included adults ≥65 years of age, with no history of cerebral vascular event, cranioencephalic trauma. Demographic factors were analyzed, CI was assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination test. For statistical analysis we used Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for each factor and multiple logistic regression as multivariate analysis. </p><p><strong>Results:</strong> 420 older adults were included, 61% were women, 32.6% with age >75 years, 84.5% with schooling <9 years, in the multiple logistic regression the following were independent factors for the presence of mild CI: dependence on basic activities of daily living (ADLs) with OR 5.88, absence of cognitive stimulation RM 4.50, age >75 years OR 2.92, polypharmacy OR 2.16, uncontrolled blood pressure OR 1.92. </p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> ADLs dependence, absence of cognitive stimulation, age >75 years, polypharmacy and uncontrolled blood pressure are risk factors associated with CI in older adults.</p><p><strong>Introducción: </strong>con el aumento<strong> </strong>en la esperanza de vida las condiciones relacionadas con mayor edad incrementaron su incidencia; una de estas patologías es el deterioro cognitivo (DC) que presenta una prevalencia de hasta el 28%, hoy en día se conocen condiciones que aumentan la presencia de DC. Sin embargo, existe controversia sobre los factores que aumentan el riesgo para su presencia. </p><p><strong>Objetivo:</strong> determinar los factores asociados al deterioro cognitivo en adultos mayores. <strong>Material y métodos: </strong>se realizó un estudio transversal, analítico, observacional, retroprolectivo que incluyó a adultos ≥ 65 años, sin antecedente de evento vascular cerebral o traumatismo craneoencefálico. Se analizaron factores demográficos, el DC se evaluó con la prueba Mini-Mental. Para el análisis estadístico se usó razón de momios (RM) e intervalo de confianza al 95% (IC95%) para cada factor y como análisis multivariado, regresión logística múltiple. </p><p><strong>Resultados: </strong>se incluyeron 420 adultos mayores, de los cuales el 61% eran mujeres, el 32.6% tenían edad > 75 años, el 84.5% con escolarización < 9 años. En la regresión logística múltiple los siguientes fueron factores independientes para la presencia de DC leve: la dependencia de actividades básicas de la vida diaria (ABVD), ausencia de estimulación cognitiva, edad > 75 años, polifarmacia y descontrol de tensión arterial. </p><p><strong>Conclusión: </strong>la dependencia de ABVD, ausencia de estimulación cognitiva, edad > 75 años, polifarmacia y descontrol de la tensión arterial son factores de riesgo asociados al DC en adultos mayores.</p&gt

The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study

AimThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery.MethodsThis was an international prospective cohort study of consecutive colorectal cancer patients with a decision for curative surgery (January-April 2020). Surgical delay was defined as an operation taking place more than 4 weeks after treatment decision, in a patient who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. A subgroup analysis explored the effects of delay in elective patients only. The impact of longer delays was explored in a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was complete resection, defined as curative resection with an R0 margin.ResultsOverall, 5453 patients from 304 hospitals in 47 countries were included, of whom 6.6% (358/5453) did not receive their planned operation. Of the 4304 operated patients without neoadjuvant therapy, 40.5% (1744/4304) were delayed beyond 4 weeks. Delayed patients were more likely to be older, men, more comorbid, have higher body mass index and have rectal cancer and early stage disease. Delayed patients had higher unadjusted rates of complete resection (93.7% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.032) and lower rates of emergency surgery (4.5% vs. 22.5%, P ConclusionOne in 15 colorectal cancer patients did not receive their planned operation during the first wave of COVID-19. Surgical delay did not appear to compromise resectability, raising the hypothesis that any reduction in long-term survival attributable to delays is likely to be due to micro-metastatic disease

Delaying surgery for patients with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection

Not availabl