16 research outputs found

    Review of bottomonium studies at Belle

    Get PDF
    We review recent bottomonium studies at Belle. The results include the new measurement of the ηb(1S ) mass, the observation of the γ(4S ) → γ (1S )η’ transition, and the observation of the e+e−→ χbJ (1P)π+π−π0 process in the Υ(11020) region

    Final Report [HRJRG-002]

    No full text

    Annual Report [HRJRG-002]

    No full text

    Measurement of the branching fractions for Cabibbo-suppressed decays D+K+Kπ+π0D^{+}\to K^{+} K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0} and D(s)+K+ππ+π0D_{(s)}^{+}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0} at Belle

    No full text
    International audienceWe present measurements of the branching fractions for the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays D+K+Kπ+π0D^+\to K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0} and Ds+K+ππ+π0D_s^{+}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}, and the doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decay D+K+ππ+π0D^{+}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}, based on 980 fb1{\rm fb}^{-1} of data recorded by the Belle experiment at the KEKB e+ee^{+}e^{-} collider. We measure these modes relative to the Cabibbo-favored modes D+Kπ+π+π0D^{+}\to K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{0} and Ds+K+Kπ+π0D_s^{+}\to K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}. Our results for the ratios of branching fractions are B(D+K+Kπ+π0)/B(D+Kπ+π+π0)=(11.32±0.13±0.26)%B(D^{+}\to K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0})/B(D^{+}\to K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}) = (11.32 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.26)\%, B(D+K+ππ+π0)/B(D+Kπ+π+π0)=(1.68±0.11±0.03)%B(D^{+}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0})/B(D^{+}\to K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}) = (1.68 \pm 0.11\pm 0.03)\%, and B(Ds+K+ππ+π0)/B(Ds+K+Kπ+π0)=(17.13±0.62±0.51)%B(D_s^{+}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0})/B(D_s^{+}\to K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}) = (17.13 \pm 0.62 \pm 0.51)\%, where the uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively. The second value corresponds to (5.83±0.42)×tan4θC(5.83\pm 0.42)\times\tan^4\theta_C, where θC\theta_C is the Cabibbo angle; this value is larger than other measured ratios of branching fractions for a doubly Cabibbo-suppressed charm decay to a Cabibbo-favored decay. Multiplying these results by world average values for B(D+Kπ+π+π0)B(D^{+}\to K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}) and B(Ds+K+Kπ+π0)B(D_s^{+}\to K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}) yields B(D+K+Kπ+π0)=(7.08±0.08±0.16±0.20)×103B(D^{+}\to K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0})= (7.08\pm 0.08\pm 0.16\pm 0.20)\times10^{-3}, B(D+K+ππ+π0)=(1.05±0.07±0.02±0.03)×103B(D^{+}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0})= (1.05\pm 0.07\pm 0.02\pm 0.03)\times10^{-3}, and B(Ds+K+ππ+π0)=(9.44±0.34±0.28±0.32)×103B(D_s^{+}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}) = (9.44\pm 0.34\pm 0.28\pm 0.32)\times10^{-3}, where the third uncertainty is due to the branching fraction of the normalization mode. The first two results are consistent with, but more precise than, the current world averages. The last result is the first measurement of this branching fraction
    corecore