Increased expression of TRAIL receptor 3 on eosinophils in churg-strauss syndrome

金沢大学医学部附属病院血液浄化療法部Objective. Prolonged survival of eosinophils plays au important role in the pathogenesis of Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS); however, its detailed molecular mechanism is still unclear. TRAIL and its receptors are expressed on a variety of cells, including eosinophils. In this study, we examined the expression of TRAIL receptors on eosinophils from patients with CSS. Methods. TRAIL receptor expression was assessed on eosinophils from healthy volunteers, patients with CSS, patients with asthma, and patients with hypereosinophilia due to parasitic infection. TRAIL-induced apoptosis of eosinophils was compared between the patients with CSS and patients with asthma. RNA interference was used to assess the effects of suppression of TRAIL receptor 3. Results. Expression of TRAIL receptor 3, a decoy receptor that acts as an antiapoptotic receptor, on eosinophils from patients with CSS was significantly higher than that in the other subjects. Moreover, in CSS, serum TRAIL receptor 3 levels showed a significant positive correlation with peripheral eosinophil counts, tissue-infiltrating eosinophils stained positive for this receptor, and peripheral T cells expressed TRAIL on their surface. Compared with asthma patients, eosinophils from CSS patients showed a significantly lower percentage of recombinant TRAIL, less autologous T cell-induced apoptosis, and decreased level of active caspase 3. Suppression of TRAIL receptor 3 through RNA interference significantly increased the recombinant TRAIL-induced apoptosis of eosinophils from CSS patients. Conclusion. Increased expression of TRAIL receptor 3 on eosinophils from patients with CSS was observed. These alterations in TRAIL receptor 3 expression might be involved in the molecular pathogenesis of CSS eosinophilia. © 2007, American College of Rheumatology

Zidovudine plus lamivudine in Human T-Lymphotropic Virus type-I-associated myelopathy: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND: No therapies have been proven to persistently improve the outcome of HTLV-I-associated myelopathy. Clinical benefit has been reported with zidovudine and with lamivudine in observational studies. We therefore conducted a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of six months combination therapy with these nucleoside analogues in sixteen patients. RESULTS: Primary outcomes were change in HTLV-I proviral load in PBMCs and clinical measures. Secondary endpoints were changes in T-cell subsets and markers of activation and proliferation. Six patients discontinued zidovudine. No significant changes in pain, bladder function, disability score, gait, proviral load or markers of T-cell activation or proliferation were seen between the two arms. Active therapy was associated with an unexplained decrease in CD8 and non-T lymphocyte counts. CONCLUSION: Failure to detect clinical improvement may have been due irreversible nerve damage in these patients with a long clinical history and future studies should target patients presenting earlier. The lack of virological effect but may reflect a lack of activity of these nucleoside analogues against HTLV-I RT in vivo, inadequate intracellular concentrations of the active moiety or the contribution of new cell infection to maintaining proviral load at this stage of infection may be relatively small masking the effects of RT inhibition