53 research outputs found
Images of Bursting Sources of High-Energy Cosmic Rays. I: Effects of Magnetic Fields
It has recently been shown that the highest energy cosmic rays (CRs) may
originate in the same cosmological objects producing -ray bursts. This
model requires the presence of intergalactic magnetic fields (IGMF) to delay
the arrival times of eV CRs by 50 years or longer relative to
the -rays, of an amplitude that is consistent with other observational
constraints. Sources of CRs coming from individual bursts should be resolved
with the planned ``Auger'' experiment, with as many as hundreds of CRs for the
brightest sources. We analyze here the apparent angular and energy distribution
of CRs from bright sources below the pion production threshold (in the energy
range ) expected in this model.
This observable distribution depends on the structure of the IGMF: the apparent
spectral width is small, , if the
intergalactic field correlation length is much larger than , and large, , in the opposite limit . The apparent angular size is also larger for smaller . If the
sources of CRs we predict are found, they will corroborate the bursting model
and they will provide us with a technique to investigate the structure of the
IGMF.Comment: Submitted to the ApJL; 10 pages AASTeX, including 2 PostScript
figure
Gravitational Lensing in Clusters of Galaxies: New Clues Regarding the Dynamics of Intracluster Gas
Long arcs in clusters of galaxies, produced by gravitational lensing, can be
used to estimate the mass interior to the arcs and therefore, constrain the
cluster mass distribution. The radial density distribution of the intracluster
gas (ICM) can be extracted from the X-ray surface brightness observations. If
the gas temperature is also known, it is then possible to probe the dynamical
state of the gas and test whether the ICM is in hydro- static equilibrium
within the gravitational potential of the cluster as a result of thermal
pressure support. We analyze three clusters that exhibit large arcs, whose
X-ray surface brightness profiles have been observed, and whose gas
temperatures have been determined. In two of the clusters, A2218 and A1689, the
central mass implied by lensing is a factor of -- too large for the gas
at the observed temperature to be in hydrostatic equilibrium solely due to
thermal pressure support. In other words, if we accept the mass estimate
derived from the lensing analysis and demand that the X-ray surface brightness
profile be consistent with the observations, the required gas temperature is a
factor of -- higher than observed. The results for the third cluster,
A2163 (the most luminous and the hottest cluster known), are more ambiguous.
The discrepancy between the X-ray and the lensing mass estimates arise because
the presence of arcs imply a highly concentrated cluster mass distribution
whereas the observed X-ray profiles imply a more extended mass distribution.
The large X-ray core radii are not the result of the limited resolution of the
X-ray detectors. We consider various possibilities that could account for the
discrepancy.Comment: 20 pages, uuencoded compressed postscript, CITA/93/3
- …