Individual and community socioeconomic status : impact on mental health in individuals with arthritis

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Beyond Race and Gender: Measuring Behavioral and Social Indicators of Pain Treatment Satisfaction in Older Black and White Cancer Patients

There are a number of factors that influence compliance with prescribed plans of care. However, there remains a need to identify the collective source health, behavioral, and social constructs have on treatment satisfaction. This study aimed to identify indicators of pain treatment satisfaction among older adults receiving outpatient treatment from a comprehensive cancer center in the southeast region of the United States. Data included a sample of 149 Black and White patients diagnosed with cancer, with the majority being White (85%) and female (57%). Patients were surveyed on questions assessing pain treatment satisfaction, pain severity, and additional social characteristics. A series of multivariate models were specified, whereby patients reporting multiple chronic conditions, poor communication, and perceived discrimination were less satisfied with treatment. Positive communication, higher self-efficacy, and fewer perceived discriminatory acts were significant among the female patients only. These findings suggest the need to develop clinical models that assess how these factors influence the degree of treatment satisfaction, while providing a comprehensive mechanism by which to service the long-term needs of older adults

Chronic disease self-management education courses: utilization by low-income, middle-aged participants

BACKGROUND: Individuals living in lower-income areas face an increased prevalence of chronic disease and, oftentimes, greater barriers to optimal self-management. Disparities in disease management are seen across the lifespan, but are particularly notable among middle-aged adults. Although evidence-based Chronic Disease Self-management Education courses are available to enhance self-management among members of this at-risk population, little information is available to determine the extent to which these courses are reaching those at greatest risk. The purpose of this study is to compare the extent to which middle-aged adults from lower- and higher-income areas have engaged in CDSME courses, and to identify the sociodemographic characteristics of lower-income, middle aged participants. METHODS: The results of this study were produced through analysis of secondary data collected during the Communities Putting Prevention to Work: Chronic Disease Self-Management Program initiative. During this initiative, data was collected from 100,000 CDSME participants across 45 states within the United States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. RESULTS: Of the entire sample included in this analysis (19,365 participants), 55 people lived in the most impoverished counties. While these 55 participants represented just 0.3% of the total study sample, researchers found this group completed courses more frequently than participants from less impoverished counties once enrolled. CONCLUSION: These results signal a need to enhance participation of middle-aged adults from lower-income areas in CDSME courses. The results also provide evidence that can be used to inform future program delivery choices, including decisions regarding recruitment materials, program leaders, and program delivery sites, to better engage this population

Preferences for Arthritis Interventions: Identifying Similarities and Differences among Blacks and Whites with Osteoarthritis

To determine if there are differences or similarities in arthritis intervention preferences and barriers to participation between Blacks and Whites with osteoarthritis (OA)

Impact of the Arthritis Foundation’s Walk With Ease Program on Arthritis Symptoms in African Americans

IntroductionInadequate program design and lack of access to evidence-based programs are major barriers to the management of chronic diseases such as arthritis, particularly for African Americans. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Arthritis Foundation’s Walk With Ease Program (WWE) in a subsample of African Americans who were part of a larger study that established evidence of the program’s efficacy.MethodsParticipants were African Americans (N = 117) with self-reported arthritis who chose to participate in either a self-directed (n = 68) or group (n = 49) 6-week WWE program. Arthritis-related symptoms (ie, pain, fatigue, stiffness; measured using visual analog scales) were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 1 year. Independent samples t tests were conducted to examine group differences (ie, self-directed vs group) in arthritis-related symptoms at baseline, and paired sample t tests were conducted to examine differences over time (ie, baseline to 6 weeks and baseline to 1 year) in symptoms. Satisfaction was examined by descriptive statistics.ResultsYounger, more educated individuals chose the self-directed format (P < .001, P = .008; respectively). After the 6-week intervention, participants reported a decrease in pain (P < .001), fatigue (P = .002), and stiffness (P < .001). At 1 year, the decrease in pain (P = .04) and stiffness (P = .002) remained constant. Overall, participants were satisfied with both program formats.ConclusionThe individualized and group formats of the WWE program improved arthritis-related pain, fatigue, and stiffness in African Americans. Culturally appealing arthritis interventions ultimately may increase the use of existing arthritis interventions

Identifying and Addressing Health Disparities in Black Older Adults with Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA), the most common form of arthritis in older adults, often results in pain, disability and poor psychological well-being. Compared to White adults, Black adults consistently report more pain, more activity limitations, and have different perceptions about OA. Racial disparities also exist in treatments, and prevalence of arthritis. It is imperative to have effective interventions and treatment options for older Blacks. Yet, few arthritis interventions have included Black participants in their samples, and nearly all of those have failed to report separate analyses indicating the effectiveness for Black adults, thus leaving a gap in the literature. The purpose of this study is to begin to identify factors needed to design arthritis interventions that will reduce barriers and increase appeal to Blacks. The present dissertation consists of one study with two related parts. The first part consists of a needs assessment that examined intervention preferences, barriers to healthcare, knowledge about interventions and care, utilization, and health beliefs among Black and White adults with self-reported physician-diagnosed OA. The second part evaluated materials used in an existing arthritis intervention for acceptability. The study was based on the Arthritis Self Management Program (ASMP). Frequencies were examined to determine needs related to arthritis healthcare of Blacks and Whites recruited from the community. Independent samples t-tests and Pearson’s Chi-square analyses were examined to determine group differences between Blacks and Whites. Blacks were more likely to report cost, lack of trust, fear of being the only person of their race, lack of recommendation from their doctor, and lack of recommendation of a family or friends as barriers to participating in arthritis interventions. In addition, Blacks were more likely to prefer the intervention content, structure and delivery, and arthritis resources presented in the needs assessment in comparison to Whites. As for the evaluation of the intervention materials, Blacks and Whites were similar on most sections. Based on our findings we suggest that practical adaptations (e.g., cost) be made to existing arthritis interventions to increase cultural sensitivity. Such adaptations have the potential to minimize barriers and offer a program that would be appealing to Blacks with OA