3 research outputs found
ΠΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ
The article presents analysis and generalization of ideas of representatives of various theoretical concepts that substantiate scientific approaches to definition of the tax equity. The use the method of inductive cognition, system approach, analysis and synthesis has resulted in formulating a comparative characteristic of looks of representatives of the classical, neoclassical, Keynesian and institutional schools at the problem of tax equity. It shows the advantage of the neoinstitutionalsm method in comparison to the βmainstreamβ: conclusions about economy are made with respect to social problems of individuals and not through scientific abstraction based on strict observance of conditions favorable for development. The advocates of the classical and Keynesian scientific school believe that the concept ot the tax equity can change depending on the character of public relations. As opposed to them, the representatives of the institutional economy enlarge their analytical machinery with instrumentarium of social sciences by bringing values, 6raditions and culture to the forefront. Such an approach allows to consider as a tax equity indicator, on one hand, the state responsibility for quality of public benefits rendered in exchange of tax payments and, on the other hand, the taxpayersβ responsibility for law enforcement. Shifting the accent towards rental payments allows to provide the tax equity at the expense of decreasing the tax burden on investments and labor. The article also brings forth the arguments in favor of the fact that the existing socio-economic differentiation of population is determined by drawbacks of the personal income taxation system. To provide the equitable levelling-off of per capita ceiling and to level down poverty it is necessary to introduce the progressive taxation scale and establish the tax-exempt minimum. The fundamental research studies on issues of equity principle implementation in building the tax system and forming the state tax policy can become the application area for the above presented results of analyzing approaches to understanding the tax equity.Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΉ, ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΊ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π°, Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π·Π° ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Π²Π·Π³Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ, Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ, ΠΊΠ΅ΠΉΠ½ΡΠΈΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ, ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»Ρ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΈΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Β«ΠΌΠ΅ΠΉΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΌΒ»: Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΠ± ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π΄Π΅Π»Π°ΡΡΡΡ Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ², Π° Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Π±ΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΉ. Π‘ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ΅ΠΉΠ½ΡΠΈΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»Ρ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°ΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡ Π½ΠΈΡ
, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΡΡ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π°ΠΏΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΡΠΊ, Π²ΡΠ΄Π²ΠΈΠ³Π°Ρ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΡ, ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ° Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Ρ, ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π·Π° ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π±Π»Π°Π³, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
Π² ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½ ΡΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ², Ρ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Ρ, ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ². Π‘ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Π² ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡ Π·Π° ΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°Π³ΡΡΠ·ΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΈΠ½Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΄. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΡΡ Π°ΡΠ³ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·Ρ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π»ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ»Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ Π±Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΡΠΌΠ°. ΠΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π² ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΡΠ½Π΄Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π°
Problems of Creating a Favorable Investment Climate in Russian Regions
The purpose of this paper is to identify the budget- and tax-related problems as may occasionally arise from the interaction of federal and sub-federal authorities hampering the growth of the investment attractiveness of regions, and to develop recommendations on their solution. To this end, a system of indicators and a typological scale have been developed to rank the Russian Federation subjects according to efforts of their regional authorities to build up local tax bases.Β To provide conditions for βholdingβ an investor in the territory of a federal subject for a long-term period, it is suggested that the existing subsidy rules be supplemented with tax characteristics. The taxing powers of regions in providing territory-oriented tax incentives are analyzed. The weak points of the powers division that lead to distortion of the local tax competition are identified along with the proposal of measures towards their elimination.
Keywords: Budgetary subsidies; tax incentives; favorable investment climate; tax competition.
JEL Classifications: H2, O16, R4
The Rent Taxation Concept for Solid Minerals Extraction and Recovery
The article considers the conceptual approaches to the taxation of natural resource use. The purpose of the article is to identify the governmental tax risks in the implementation of various scenarios of mining rent withdrawal and to substantiate the methodology of resource taxation in extraction and processing of solid minerals, based on the principle of tax justice. The authors reveal the factors of tax risks for the state in exercising its sovereign right to the mining rent. The article formulates the requirements to the tax system, the observance of which will allow to consider the factors of the state tax risks. Advantages and disadvantages of certain fiscal payments for extraction of mineral raw materials are determined. It is shown that the resource tax should be based on the present value, calculated as the net present value of the investor for the entire lifetime of the project. The authors propose a mining rent taxation mechanism, which would increase budget revenues while maintaining the incentives for mining companies to invest in exploration. The main forks in the design of such a rent income tax are shown