Источники и традиция пяти славянских средневековых текстов против нежита на свинцовых амулетах и в рукописях

The paper aims at studying five medieval Slavonic historiolae concerning nezhit in comparison to ancient and Byzantine Greek texts. The author brings together evidence from both tablets and manuscripts. The study reveals several important textual, linguistic and cultural aspects concerning the significance of the Slavonic text versions.DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2022.11.1.1Целью статьи является изучение пяти средневековых славянских текстов заклинаний против магии нежита в сопоставлении с аналогичными античными и византийскими греческими текстами. Автор рассматривает в комплексе данные текстов, сохранившихся как в надписях на защитных амулетах, так и в рукописных источниках. На основе сравнительного анализа выявлен ряд существенных текстологических, лингвистических и культурологических аспектов темы, показывающих значение славянского материала.DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2022.11.1.1

A Note on the Adoption of the Byzantine Models in Medieval Bulgaria (9th–10th Centuries). The Case with the Chrysorrhoas Collection

The paper aims at examining the first Slavic collection of homilies of John Chrysostom, called Zlatostruy (i.e. Chrysorrhoas or Golden Stream). The peculiarities of its content, compilation strategy and impact on the medieval Bulgarian literature, revealed in previous studies, allow us to extract features that are related to the flourishing of the 10th century Bulgarian literary tradition and the successful adoption of Byzantine models.Publication of English-language versions of the volumes of the yearly Studia Ceranea. Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Centre for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-East Europe financed through contract no. 501/1/P-DUN/2017 from the funds of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education devoted to the promotion of scholarship

Three Layers of Lexical Editing in Codex Zographensis

e-ISSN: 2305-6754 p-ISSN: 2304-0785 Indexed in: ............................................. Creative Commons ............................................. ............................................. About The Author Yavor Miltenov https://ibl.bas.bg/en/struktura/istoriya-na-balgarskiya-ezik/satrudnitsi/ The Institute for Bulgarian Language (IBL), 52 Shipchenski Prohod Blvdr., block 17, Sofia 1113 Bulgaria Bulgaria Assoc. prof. Open Journal Systems Current Issue Atom logo RSS2 logo RSS1 logo Article Tools Indexing metadata Finding References Review policy Email this article (Login required) Email the author (Login required) Post a Comment (Login required) User Username Password Remember me Language Select Language Journal Help Journal Content Search Search Scope Browse By Issue By Author By Title Notifications View Subscribe Information For Readers For Authors For Librarians Keywords 15th century 18th century Church Slavonic Enlightenment Novgorod Old Church Slavonic Old Russian Old Russian language Old Russian literature Russian Russian language St. Clement of Ohrid chronicles epigraphy hagiography orthography paleography poetics syntax textual criticism translation Home About Login Search Current Archives Announcements Editorial Board Publication Ethics Our Languages MM Registration Certificate Home > Vol 8, No 1 (2019) > Miltenov Three Layers of Lexical Editing in Codex Zographensis Yavor Miltenov Abstract The article aims to examine Cyrillic and Glagolitic glosses in the OCS Codex Zographensis, inserted by the scribe himself. These notes in the margins are among the earliest examples of editorial work in a Slavonic written monument ever, hence they are an important evidence about the way the lexical editing in the 9th–10th century was applied and about its essence. The study on the glosses is put in the context of previous research on 1) the lexical variants with which the text of Codex Zographensis is opposed to that of Codex Marianus, Assemanianus and Liber Sabbae, and 2) the lexical alterations which in scholarly literature are treated as East Bulgarian. The analysis leads to the conclusion that Cyrillic was the copyist’s usual script, that his daily writing routine might have been in Cyrillic, and that his intention was to replace or explain certain foreign, non-Slavic words. Most synonyms and interpretations he offers are not influenced by the tradition and are probably due to his own initiative, which typologically corresponds to already established processes of lexical editing in 10th century Bulgaria

Три слоя лексического редактирования в Зографском евангелии

В статията се изследват кирилските и глаголическите глоси в полетата на Зографското евангелие, които са оставени от преписвача на ръкописа. Те са едно от най-ранните свидетелства за начина, по който през Х–ХI в. се е извършвало лексикалното редактиране на текстовете и за същността на този процес. Проучването на глосите е поставено в контекста на предходни проучвания върху други два пласта: лексикалните варианти, с които текстът на Зографското евангелие се противопоставя на този в Мариинското евангелие, Асеманиевото евангелие и Савината книга, и синонимните замени, които в научната литература се третират като източнобългарски. Направеният анализ води към заключението, че ежедневното писмо на преписвача е кирилицата, а стремежът му е да замени или обясни определени чужди, неславянски думи. Повечето синоними и тълкувания, които той предлага в полетата, не са повлияни от традицията и най-вероятно са негова собствена инициатива, която се вписва типологически във вече установени процеси на лексикална редакция през българския Х в. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2019.8.1.1The article aims to examine Cyrillic and Glagolitic glosses in the OCS Codex Zographensis, inserted by the scribe himself. These notes in the margins are among the earliest examples of editorial work in a Slavonic written monument ever, hence they are an important evidence about the way the lexical editing in the 9th–10th century was applied and about its essence. The study on the glosses is put in the context of previous research on 1) the lexical variants with which the text of Codex Zographensis is opposed to that of Codex Marianus, Assemanianus and Liber Sabbae, and 2) the lexical alterations which in scholarly literature are treated as East Bulgarian. The analysis leads to the conclusion that Cyrillic was the copyist’s usual script, that his daily writing routine might have been in Cyrillic, and that his intention was to replace or explain certain foreign, non-Slavic words. Most synonyms and interpretations he offers are not influenced by the tradition and are probably due to his own initiative, which typologically corresponds to already established processes of lexical editing in 10th century Bulgaria. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2019.8.1.1Целью статьи является изучение кириллических и глаголических глосс на полях Зографского евангелия, которые добавлены писцом рукописи и представляют собой одно из древнейших свидетельств лексического редактирования X–XI в. Глоссы рассматриваются в контексте 1) лексических разночтений, в которых текст Зографского евангелия противопоставляется Мариинскому и Ассеманиевому евангелию и Саввиной книге и 2) синонимичных замен, которые в научной литературе считаются восточноболгарскими. Анализ показывает, что основной азбукой писца Зографского евангелия была кириллица, а его цель заключалась в замене или объяснении некоторых неславянских слов. Большинство синонимов и толкований он включил, как кажется, не под влиянием традиции, а, скорее всего, по собственной инициативе. Типологические характеристики его работы сходны с уже известными особенностями лексического редактирования в Болгарии десятого века. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2019.8.1.