X-I and X-II Open Reading Frames of HTLV-I Are Not Required for Virus Replication or for Immortalization of Primary T-Cellsin Vitro

AbstractIn contrast to other retroviruses of the oncovirinae subgroup, the primate and bovine leukemia viruses (HTLV, STLV, and BLV) encode genes in the X-region of the genome, between the env gene and the 3′ long terminal repeat. In HTLV-I, two overlapping open reading frames (ORFs) in the distal half of the X-region encode tax and rex genes, while two ORFs (X-I and X-II) in the proximal half of this region potentially encode proteins designated p12XI(or rof) and p30XII(or tof). The biological functions and mechanisms of tax and rex have been studied extensively whereas the roles of the other ORFs have not yet been established. To identify possible functions for ORFs X-I and X-II, an infectious molecular clone of HTLV-I and a mutant provirus lacking these ORFs were compared with respect to virus replication, gene expression, and ability to immortalize primary T-cells. When transiently transfected into 293 cells, both intact and deleted proviruses directed the synthesis of virus mRNAs and proteins that were quantitatively and qualitatively identical. These viruses were also indistinguishable in their abilities to infect and replicate in DBS-FRhL cells, which are permissive for HTLV-I propagation. Immortalized T-cell lines were established after cell-free or coculture methods for infection of activated, human peripheral blood or cord blood lymphocytes with each of the cloned viruses. The growth kinetics, cytokine dependence, and cell surface markers of the infected T-cell cultures were similar for each provirus clone. Thus, ORFs X-I and X-II are not essential for virus infectivity, replication, gene expression, or T-cell immortalizationin vitro

Reactivation of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus by natural products from Kaposi's sarcoma endemic regions

Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) and its causative agent, Kaposi’s sarcoma associated herpesvirus (KSHV/HHV-8), a gamma2 herpesvirus, have distinctive geographical distributions that are largely unexplained. We propose the “oncoweed” hypothesis to explain these differences, namely that environmental cofactors present in KS endemic regions cause frequent reactivation of KSHV in infected subjects, leading to increased viral shedding and transmission leading to increased prevalence of KSHV infection as well as high viral load levels and antibody titers. Reactivation also plays a role in the pathogenesis of KSHV-associated malignancies. To test this hypothesis, we employed an in vitro KSHV reactivation assay that measured increases in KSHV viral load in KSHV infected primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) cells and screened aqueous natural product extracts from KS endemic regions. Of 4,842 extracts from 38 countries, 184 (5%) caused KSHV reactivation. Extracts that caused reactivation came from a wide variety of plant families, and extracts from Africa, where KSHV is highly prevalent, caused the greatest level of reactivation. Time course experiments were performed using 28 extracts that caused the highest levels of reactivation. The specificity of the effects on viral replication was examined using transcriptional profiling of all viral mRNAs. The array data indicated that the natural extracts caused an ordered cascade of lytic replication similar to that seen after induction with synthetic activators. These in vitro data provide support for the “oncoweed” hypothesis by demonstrating basic biological plausibility