70 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Unresolved Questions in Rheumatology: Motion for Debate: The Data Support Evidence-Based Management Recommendations for Cardiovascular Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Endothelial Dysfunction, Inflammation, and Apoptosis in Diabetes Mellitus
Endothelial dysfunction is regarded as an important factor in the pathogenesis of vascular disease in obesity-related type 2 diabetes. The imbalance in repair and injury (hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia) results in microvascular changes, including apoptosis of microvascular cells, ultimately leading to diabetes related complications. This review summarizes the mechanisms by which the interplay between endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and apoptosis may cause (micro)vascular damage in patients with diabetes mellitus
Stakeholders' perspectives on a patient-reported outcome measure-based drug safety monitoring system for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases
Background: Biologics are used as effective therapeutics to treat a variety of diseases. Even though biologics are widely used, knowledge on the post-marketing experience of patients is limited. Therefore, a framework was established for a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM)-based drug safety monitoring system for ADRs attributed to biologics, known as the ‘Dutch Biologic Monitor’. Objective: Generation of a multi-stakeholder perspective on the preferred setup, potential and added value of a PROM-based national drug safety monitoring system. Methods: Nineteen stakeholders were interviewed following a structured interview guide. Transcribed data were coded and analyzed to count frequencies and to generate recurring themes. Results: Stakeholders (84.2%) support the establishment of a national drug safety monitoring system, but the feasibility depends on the implementation process. The need for integration and assessment of PROMs on ADRs in clinical practice and the preference to monitor small molecules and new drugs were emphasized. Preferably, all pharmacological options per indication should be monitored. Conclusions: Stakeholders recommend to establish a PROM-based national drug safety monitoring system focused on ADRs attributed to biologics, small molecules, and new drugs. Moreover, PROMs on ADRs ideally need to become integrated in clinical practice to provide health-care providers more insight in patients’ perspectives
Immune-mediated inflammatory disease patients' preferences in adverse drug reaction information regarding biologics
Objectives: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in studies and medical practice to obtain information on patients’ perspectives toward their treatment or disease. However, most study outcomes are primarily directed at healthcare professionals. It was aimed to obtain insight in which type of information immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) patients prefer to receive after participating in the Dutch Biologic Monitor (DBM), a PRO-based prospective cohort event monitoring system focused on adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Methods: A survey was conducted among DBM participants that wanted information about the results. Patients’ preferences were identified using twelve statements and rated with five-point Likert-type scales. Subgroup analyses and differences between statements were performed using Mann-Whitney U Tests. Results: The survey was completed by 591 patients (response rate 67.6%). Most respondents had inflammatory rheumatic diseases (76.8%) and used adalimumab (37.2%) or etanercept (33.2%). Respondents preferred results per IMID over aggregated results (p = <0.001). Information on whether patients with similar IMIDs experience ADRs (average 4.5), which biologics are most likely to cause ADRs (4.4) and whether ADRs disappear (4.4) were most interesting. Conclusion: DBM participants prefer to receive disease-specific information on ADRs that is tailored to their own biologic and IMID, including the outcome of ADRs
Cardiovascular risk management in patients with active Ankylosing Spondylitis: a detailed evaluation
Geen verhoogd maligniteitsrisico bij TNF-α-blokkers. Of toch wel?
Tumour necrosis factor α (TNF) blockers were a major step forward in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In view of their immunosuppressive effects, concerns about enhancement of cancer development have arisen. So far there is no firm evidence that TNF-blockers increase the risk of solid tumours or lymphomas. However, it appears likely that TNF-blockers enhance the risk of non-melanoma skin cancer in patients with RA. Hence, it is recommended to screen patients treated with TNF-blockers periodically for skin cancer whereas routine screening for other malignancies is not useful
Bepalen cardiovasculair risico bij reumapatiënten: resultaten uit trials niet afwachten
Cardiovascular risk management is clearly indicated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) today because this risk is comparable to patients with diabetes. Although formal evidence of cardiovascular endpoint trials with statins and/or antihypertensives is lacking in patients with RA, there are no indications that these drugs will have limited effect. In contrast, there is accumulating evidence as to the efficacy of the use of these drugs in RA that is at least comparable to their effects in the general population. All patients with RA should therefore receive cardiovascular risk-management therapy aimed at powerful suppression of the chronic inflammatory process as well as treatment with statins and/or antihypertensives, if indicated. Obviously, monitoring in the clinical setting is necessary to document if such therapy does indeed reduce cardiovascular disease in patients with RA
Bepalen cardiovasculair risico bij reumapatiënten: resultaten uit trials niet afwachten
Cardiovascular risk management is clearly indicated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) today because this risk is comparable to patients with diabetes. Although formal evidence of cardiovascular endpoint trials with statins and/or antihypertensives is lacking in patients with RA, there are no indications that these drugs will have limited effect. In contrast, there is accumulating evidence as to the efficacy of the use of these drugs in RA that is at least comparable to their effects in the general population. All patients with RA should therefore receive cardiovascular risk-management therapy aimed at powerful suppression of the chronic inflammatory process as well as treatment with statins and/or antihypertensives, if indicated. Obviously, monitoring in the clinical setting is necessary to document if such therapy does indeed reduce cardiovascular disease in patients with RA
- …