Results of Fitting a Logistic Regression Model to Elephant and Human Presence/Absence Data for Each MIKE Survey Site Separately

<p>Distance to road (in kilometres) was used as the explanatory variable (except for probability of elephant occurrence for Minkébé where modelling is not required due to an effective probability of 1). Elephant data are shown to the left, and human data to the right. The observations and regression lines are colour-coded by site, and the 95% confidence interval is indicated by the dotted lines. The probability of elephant occurrence is significantly related to distance to road for all sites except Minkébé and Salonga. Due to the imprecision in the data and other influences not captured by distance to road, the probability of human presence is only significantly related to distance to road for the Ndoki-Dzanga site for the separate site analyses.</p

Results of Fitting a Logistic Regression Model to Elephant and Human Presence/Absence Megatransect Data

<p>Distance to road (in kilometres) and location within or outside the protected areas were used as explanatory variables. (A) shows the elephant data, and (B) shows the human data. The observations and regression lines are colour-coded to correspond to within or outside the protected areas and the dashed line shows the regression line with only the distance to road covariate. The covariates distance to road and location within or outside the protected areas are significant for both elephant and human probability of occurrence.</p

MIKE Survey Sites and the Megatransect

<p>Note that the since the Dzanga-Sangha and Nouabalé-Ndoki MIKE sites comprise a contiguous forest block, they were combined into a single unit (Ndoki-Dzanga) for analytical purposes.</p

Interpolated Elephant Dung Count and Human-Sign Frequency across the Ndoki-Dzanga MIKE Site

<p>Increasing colour intensity signifies increasing dung and human-sign frequency.</p

Estimated Conditional Dependence of Elephant Dung-Pile Numbers on Distance from Road (in Kilometres) and Distance to the Nearest Protected Area Boundary (in Kilometres)

<p>(A) shows the effect of distance from the road, and (B) shows the effect of distance to the nearest boundary of the protected area. Negative distances indicate locations inside protected areas. Estimates (solid lines) and confidence intervals (dashed lines), with a rug plot indicating observation density along the bottom of the plot, are shown. To avoid over-fitting, the degrees of freedom for this model were restricted to 3 for both covariates.</p

Estimated Conditional Dependence of Elephant Dung-Pile Numbers on Distance to Road (in Kilometres)

<p>Estimates (solid line) and confidence intervals (dashed lines), with a rug plot indicating observation density along the bottom of the plot, are shown. To avoid over-fitting, the degrees of freedom were restricted to two for the distance-to-road covariate.</p

Results of Fitting a Logistic Regression Model to Elephant and Human Presence/Absence Data Pooled across MIKE Survey Sites

<p>Distance to road (in kilometres) and site were used as explanatory variables. (A) shows the elephant data, and (B) shows the human data. The observations and regression lines are colour-coded by site and the dashed line shows the regression line without the inclusion of site as a covariate. The covariates distance to road and site are significant for both elephant and human probability of occurrence. The dissimilarity between sites is more pronounced when modelling the probability of elephant occurrence.</p