39 research outputs found

    Can high-risk fungicides be used in mixtures without selecting for fungicide resistance?

    Get PDF
    Fungicide mixtures produced by the agrochemical industry often contain low-risk fungicides, to which fungal pathogens are fully sensitive, together with high-risk fungicides known to be prone to fungicide resistance. Can these mixtures provide adequate disease control while minimizing the risk for the development of resistance? We present a population dynamics model to address this question. We found that the fitness cost of resistance is a crucial parameter to determine the outcome of competition between the sensitive and resistant pathogen strains and to assess the usefulness of a mixture. If fitness costs are absent, then the use of the high-risk fungicide in a mixture selects for resistance and the fungicide eventually becomes nonfunctional. If there is a cost of resistance, then an optimal ratio of fungicides in the mixture can be found, at which selection for resistance is expected to vanish and the level of disease control can be optimized

    Spatial Correlations in Finite Samples Revealed by Coulomb Explosion

    No full text

    Data on quantitative resistance of wheat to Septoria tritici blotch

    No full text
    Data consists of 10 columns, first row shows column names. Each subsequent row corresponds to data from an individual leaf. Column 1 - leaf index, column 2 - leaf label, column 3 - leaf area in mm2, column 4 - area covered by necrotic tissue in mm2, column 5 - percentage of leaf area covered by lesions (PLACL), column 6 - number of pycnidia on the leaf, column 7 - mean area of pycnidia on the leaf in mm2, column 8 - number of pycnidia per cm2 leaf, column 9 - number of pycnidia per cm2 lesion, column 10 - pycnidia grey value. Leaf label in column 2 uniquely identifies each leaf in the collection. It consists of three parts divided by underscore symbols "_". First part describes the time point of collection ("c1" - collection t1, 25 May 2016; "c3" - collection t2, 4 July, 2016). Second part is the sowing number that uniquely identifies the small wheat plot planted with a specific wheat cultivar. Third part is the index of a leaf within a specific plot. For example, leaf with the label "c1_sn133_7" comes from collection t1, sowing number 133, leaf index 7

    Data on quantitative resistance of wheat to Septoria tritici blotch

    No full text
    Data consists of 10 columns, first row shows column names. Each subsequent row corresponds to data from an individual leaf. Column 1 - leaf index, column 2 - leaf label, column 3 - leaf area in mm2, column 4 - area covered by necrotic tissue in mm2, column 5 - percentage of leaf area covered by lesions (PLACL), column 6 - number of pycnidia on the leaf, column 7 - mean area of pycnidia on the leaf in mm2, column 8 - number of pycnidia per cm2 leaf, column 9 - number of pycnidia per cm2 lesion, column 10 - pycnidia grey value. Leaf label in column 2 uniquely identifies each leaf in the collection. It consists of three parts divided by underscore symbols "_". First part describes the time point of collection ("c1" - collection t1, 25 May 2016; "c3" - collection t2, 4 July, 2016). Second part is the sowing number that uniquely identifies the small wheat plot planted with a specific wheat cultivar. Third part is the index of a leaf within a specific plot. For example, leaf with the label "c1_sn133_7" comes from collection t1, sowing number 133, leaf index 7
    corecore