4 research outputs found

    Dissecting primary and secondary senescence to enable new senotherapeutic strategies

    No full text
    Cellular senescence is a state of stable cell cycle arrest that is known to be elicited in response to different stresses or forms of damage. Senescence limits the replication of old, damaged, and precancerous cells in the short-term but is implicated in diseases and debilities of aging due to loss of regenerative reserve and secretion of a complex combination of factors called the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). More recently, investigators have discovered that senescent cells induced by these methods (what we term “primary senescent cells”) are also capable of inducing other non-senescent cells to undergo senescence — a phenomenon we call “secondary senescence.” Secondary senescence has been demonstrated to occur via two broad types of mechanisms. First, factors in the SASP have been shown to be involved in spreading senescence; we call this phenomenon “paracrine senescence.” Second, primary senescent cells can induce senescence via an additional group of mechanisms involving cell-to-cell contacts of different types; we term this phenomenon “juxtacrine senescence.” “Secondary senescence” in our definition is thus the overarching term for both paracrine and juxtacrine senescence together. By allowing cells that are inherently small in number and incapable of replication to increase in number and possibly spread to anatomically distant locations, secondary senescence allows an initially small number of senescent cells to contribute further to age-related pathologies. We propose that understanding how primary and secondary senescent cells differ from each other and the mechanisms of their spread will enable the development of new rejuvenation therapies to target different senescent cell populations and interrupt their spread, extending human health- and potentially lifespan

    Aging of the immune system: Focus on natural killer cells phenotype and functions

    No full text
    Aging is the greatest risk factor for nearly all major chronic diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, cancer, Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases of aging. Age-related impairment of immune function (immunosenescence) is one important cause of age-related morbidity and mortality, which may extend beyond its role in infectious disease. One aspect of immunosenescence that has received less attention is age-related natural killer (NK) cell dysfunction, characterized by reduced cytokine secretion and decreased target cell cytotoxicity, accompanied by and despite an increase in NK cell numbers with age. Moreover, recent studies have revealed that NK cells are the central actors in the immunosurveillance of senescent cells, whose age-related accumulation is itself a probable contributor to the chronic sterile low-grade inflammation developed with aging (“inflammaging”). NK cell dysfunction is therefore implicated in the increasing burden of infection, malignancy, inflammatory disorders, and senescent cells with age. This review will focus on recent advances and open questions in understanding the interplay between systemic inflammation, senescence burden, and NK cell dysfunction in the context of aging. Understanding the factors driving and enforcing NK cell aging may potentially lead to therapies countering age-related diseases and underlying drivers of the biological aging process itself.</div

    Supplementary information for Selective ablation of primary and paracrine senescent cells by targeting iron dyshomeostasis

    Get PDF
    Supplementary files for article Selective ablation of primary and paracrine senescent cells by targeting iron dyshomeostasis Senescent cells can spread the senescent phenotype to other cells by secreting senescence-associated secretory phenotype factors. The resulting paracrine senescent cells make a significant contribution to the burden of senescent cell accumulation with age. Previous efforts made to characterize paracrine senescence are unreliable due to analyses being based on mixed populations of senescent and non-senescent cells. Here, we use dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) as a surface maker to isolate senescent cells from mixed populations. Using this technique, we enrich the percentage of paracrine senescence from 40% to 85%. We then use this enriched culture to characterize DPP4+ primary and paracrine senescent cells. We observe ferroptosis dysregulation and ferrous iron accumulation as a common phenomenon in both primary and paracrine senescent cells. Finally, we identify ferroptosis induction and ferrous iron-activatable prodrug as a broad-spectrum senolytic approach to ablate multiple types of primary and paracrine senescent cells. </p

    Selective ablation of primary and paracrine senescent cells by targeting iron dyshomeostasis

    No full text
    Senescent cells can spread the senescent phenotype to other cells by secreting senescence-associated secretory phenotype factors. The resulting paracrine senescent cells make a significant contribution to the burden of senescent cell accumulation with age. Previous efforts made to characterize paracrine senescence are unreliable due to analyses being based on mixed populations of senescent and non-senescent cells. Here, we use dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) as a surface maker to isolate senescent cells from mixed populations. Using this technique, we enrich the percentage of paracrine senescence from 40% to 85%. We then use this enriched culture to characterize DPP4+ primary and paracrine senescent cells. We observe ferroptosis dysregulation and ferrous iron accumulation as a common phenomenon in both primary and paracrine senescent cells. Finally, we identify ferroptosis induction and ferrous iron-activatable prodrug as a broad-spectrum senolytic approach to ablate multiple types of primary and paracrine senescent cells
    corecore