Long-term Follow-up on Revisions of a Recalled Large Head Metal-on-metal Hip Prosthesis: A Single Surgeon Series

Background: In 2010, a recall was issued for a specific monoblock large head metal-on-metal (MoM) hip prosthesis due to short-term revision rates of 12%-13% (articular surface replacement, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Warsaw, IN). High complication, infection, and rerevision rates for revised MoM implants have been reported. The purpose of the study is to report long-term outcomes and trend metal ion levels of this recalled MoM prosthesis from a single surgeon series. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients that underwent revision of large MoM hip replacements between 2010 and 2015. Pre- and post-revision Harris Hip Score (HHS), cup abduction angles, anteversion angles, and cup sizes were compared. Survivorship and HHS were the primary outcomes measured; serum cobalt and chromium levels were secondary outcomes. Multivariate linear regression was used to examine the correlation between prerevision serum metal ion levels and HHS. Results: A total of 24 hips (21 patients) met inclusion criteria. Mean time to revision was 4.12 years ± 1.1. Mean follow-up was 10.0 years (7-11.9 years). Mean HHS increased significantly after revision from 48.5 to 89.5 (P < .001). Higher prerevision cobalt levels were correlated with lower prerevision HHS (cobalt R = 0.25; chromium R = 0.3160). There was no correlation with prerevision cobalt (P = .2671) or chromium (P = .3160) with postrevision HHS. Most recent metal ion testing revealed a significant decrease in both cobalt (P = .0084) and chromium (P = .0115). Survival rate is 100%. Conclusions: Our study showed excellent survivorship and outcomes at 10 years. There were no failures for any reason including infection. This differs from previous studies and confirms excellent long-term results are possible with revision of this recalled MoM implant

Scapulothoracic Arthroscopy for Snapping Scapula Syndrome

Background: Snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) is a disruption of the normal smooth motion of the scapulothoracic joint leading to clicking or “snapping” which can be painful or painless. There are a variety of etiologies with first-line treatment being conservative. If patients fail extensive nonoperative treatments, then surgery may be considered. Although technically challenging, arthroscopic treatment is recommended due to its decreased morbidity and improved cosmesis. Indications: We present a 21-year-old man with a 2-year history of mechanical popping and crepitus with overhead and scapulothoracic motion of his left arm. After failing an extensive trial of conservative therapy, the patient underwent scapulothoracic arthroscopy with bursectomy and partial resection of the superomedial border of the scapula. Technique Description: The patient is positioned prone with the operative arm behind the back to elevate the medial border off the chest wall. The scapula is outlined. Two arthroscopic portals are used; the superior portal is 3 cm medial to the medial border of the scapula at the level of the scapular spine and the inferior portal is 4 cm inferior to this at the inferomedial angle of the scapula. Viewing is typically done from the inferior portal, and the superior portal is used for resection of the bursa and superomedial border of the scapula. A shaver and ablator are used to perform a bursectomy and expose the superomedial border of the scapula. An arthroscopic bur is used to partially resect the superomedial border of the scapula at approximately 3.5 cm wide and 2 cm deep. Results: Although there are limited studies examining outcomes after scapulothoracic arthroscopy, the current literature suggests that scapulothoracic arthroscopy is effective in improving crepitus, pain, and clinical outcome scores. Discussion/Conclusion: In cases of SSS which have failed exhaustive conservative therapy, arthroscopic bursectomy and partial bony resection can be an effective treatment option with minimal invasiveness, improved cosmesis, and early return to activities. Proper patient positioning and careful portal placement are critical to avoid iatrogenic injury, particularly to neurologic structures. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication

Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Shoulder Instability

Background: Posterior shoulder instability occurs in 2% to 10% of shoulder instability cases and is more commonly due to repetitive microtrauma as opposed to the more traumatic onset seen in anterior shoulder instability. In posterior instability, the posterior capsulolabral complex becomes attenuated or torn. Thus, surgical treatment aims to restore the posterior soft-tissue stabilizers typically with an arthroscopic, suture-anchor-based labral repair. Indications: Surgical indications include posterior instability with traumatic cause and associated soft-tissue and/or osseous pathology and for those patients with repetitive microtrauma who have failed nonsurgical management. Technique Description: Following diagnostic arthroscopy, the glenoid is prepared using an arthroscopic elevator, rasp, and chisel first viewing from the posterior portal, then from the anterior portal using a 70° arthroscope. An all-suture anchor is placed at the 7 o’clock position using a curved guide which obviates the need for an accessory 7 o’clock portal. The repair suture is then shuttled through the labrum using a suture lasso and monofilament. This repair suture is then shuttled through the suture anchor using the inbuilt shuttling fiberlink. The repair suture is then tightened to secure the labrum. The remainder of the repair uses knotless 2.9-mm biocomposite suture anchors and free suture tape as the all-suture anchor and associated curved guide are typically only necessary for the angle of the most inferior portal. Following a 3 to 5 anchor repair, the posterior portal capsular rent is closed to avoid leaving a stress riser. Posterior capsular closure is achieved using monofilament suture passed with a birdbeak and tied blindly in the subacromial space. Results: In a study of 200 shoulders at 36 months, patients undergoing posterior stabilization had improvements in their American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and improvements in stability, pain and function. Ninety percent of patients were able to return to sport and 64% of patients returned to the same level. Failure rate was low at 6%. Discussion/Conclusion: Posterior labral repair is a technically nuanced but reliable procedure for the management of posterior instability. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication

Arthroscopic Repair of a Type VIII Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Tear

Background: Type VIII superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tears are described as SLAP type II tears with posterior extension to the posterior inferior glenohumeral ligament. These tears are a common source of pain, instability, and decreased function in active individuals, particularly overhead or throwing athletes. Indications: Type VIII SLAP tears can cause pain and loss of sports performance, especially in a throwing athlete. This patient is a quarterback and pitcher who had magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic evidence of a type VIII SLAP tear with pain and inability to throw at his preinjury level. Technique Description: In the lateral decubitus position, a standard posterior portal is established along with anterior and accessory lateral portals. A type VIII SLAP tear is identified and the arm is taken out of balanced suspension traction and placed in abduction and external rotation which shows displacement of the posterior labrum and peelback of the superior labrum indicating pathologic labral instability. The labrum is then elevated and glenoid prepared to achieve healthy bleeding bone. Tape sutures are then passed around the labrum and placed into a glenoid anchor starting superiorly and continuing the repair posteroinferiorly. Three anchors were placed in the superior labrum using a percutaneous technique, with 2 more placed from the posterior portal to complete the 5-anchor repair. The posterior portal is then closed with a single monofilament suture to prevent a potential stress riser in the capsule. Results: The literature suggests that athletes with type VIII SLAP tears can expect improved functional outcomes and high return to play rates (>90%); however, only 50% to 70% of throwing athletes return to the same level of play. Discussion/Conclusion: Type VIII SLAP tears are an important cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction, particularly in overhead athletes. Arthroscopic repair of type VIII SLAP tears can improve functional outcomes and ability to return to sport; however, throwing athletes experience lower rates of return to previous level. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication

Arthroscopic Repair of a 360° Labrum and Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear After Shoulder Dislocation

Background: Rotator cuff tears after anterior shoulder instability are more common in patients >40 years of age and rare in younger patients where shoulder instability is most common. Although infrequent, little data exist on the evaluation of combined labral and rotator cuff tears in athletes. Indications: Combined rotator cuff and labral tears in the young patient population have a high risk of recurrent instability and require unique intraoperative and postoperative considerations. This patient is a Division 1 collegiate wrestler who sustained a 360° labral and full-thickness rotator cuff tear after an acute traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. Technique Description: The lateral decubitus position is utilized and a posterior viewing portal is established along with anterior and accessory lateral portals. The 360° labral tear is first addressed by appropriately preparing the glenoid creating a quality healing surface. Tape sutures are then utilized to perform a knotless anterior labral repair. The superior labrum, anterior to posterior (SLAP) and then posterior labral repair are sequentially performed. The posterior portal is closed with a polydioxanone (PDS) suture to prevent a stress riser in the capsule. The rotator cuff tear is then repaired in a knotless double row configuration after appropriate greater tuberosity preparation. Results: Recent studies evaluating athletes with combined rotator cuff and labral pathology who underwent arthroscopic repair reported 90% good to excellent satisfaction with 77% returning to pre-injury level of athletics. Although few studies have evaluated combined labral and rotator cuff repair and concerns with stiffness exist, the current literature and the authors own experience have found good outcomes following single-stage repair. Discussion/Conclusion: Combined labral and rotator cuff tears after anterior shoulder dislocation in the young athletic population are rare and can be challenging to treat. Although there is limited data on these combined injuries in young athletic populations, the current literature and authors’ experience support single stage surgical treatment of combined labral and rotator cuff tears which typically result in improved patient reported outcomes and return to sport. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication

Early hip fracture surgery is safe for patients on direct oral anticoagulants

Abstract. Objectives:. To determine how preoperative direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use affects rates of blood transfusion, clinically important blood loss, and 30-day mortality in patients with hip fracture undergoing surgery within 48 hours of presentation to the emergency department. Design:. Retrospective cohort study. Setting:. Academic trauma center. Patients:. A total of 535 patients with hip fracture who underwent open cephalomedullary nail fixation or arthroplasty either taking a direct oral anticoagulant or no form of chemical anticoagulant/antiplatelet agent before presentation (control). Main Outcome Measures:. Demographics, time to surgery, type of surgery, blood transfusion requirement, clinically important blood loss, and 30-day mortality. Results:. Forty-one patients (7.7%) were taking DOACs. DOAC patients were older (81.7 vs. 77 years, P = 0.02) and had higher BMI (26.9 vs. 24.2 kg/m2, P = 0.01). Time from admission to surgery was similar between DOAC users (20.1 hours) and the control (18.7 hours, P > 0.4). There was no difference in receipt of blood transfusion (P = 0.4), major bleeding diagnosis (P = 0.2), acute blood loss anemia diagnosis (P = 0.5), and 30-day mortality (P = 1) between the DOAC and control group. This was true when stratifying by type of surgery as well. Conclusions:. Our results suggest that early surgery may be safe in patients with hip fracture taking DOACs despite theoretical risk of increased bleeding. Because early surgery has previously been associated with decreased morbidity and mortality, we suggest that hip fracture surgery should not be delayed because a patient is taking direct oral anticoagulants. Level of Evidence:. Prognostic Level III