External counterpulsation therapy improves endothelial function in patients with refractory angina pectoris

AbstractObjectivesThe goal of this study was to investigate the influence of short-term external counterpulsation (ECP) therapy on flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).BackgroundIn patients with CAD, the vascular endothelium is usually impaired and modification or reversal of endothelial dysfunction may significantly enhance treatment. Although ECP therapy reduces angina and improves exercise tolerance in patients with CAD, its short-term effects on FMD in patients with refractory angina pectoris have not yet been described.MethodsWe prospectively assessed endothelial function in 20 consecutive CAD patients (15 males), mean age 68 ± 11 years, with refractory angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] angina class III to IV), unsuitable for coronary revascularization, before and after ECP, and compared them with 20 age- and gender-matched controls. Endothelium-dependent brachial artery FMD and endothelium-independent nitroglycerin (NTG)-mediated vasodilation were assessed before and after ECP therapy, using high-resolution ultrasound.ResultsExternal counterpulsation therapy resulted in significant improvement in post-intervention FMD (8.2 ± 2.1%, p = 0.01), compared with controls (3.1 ± 2.2%, p = 0.78). There was no significant effect of treatment on NTG-induced vasodilation between ECP and controls (10.7 ± 2.8% vs. 10.2 ± 2.4%, p = 0.85). External counterpulsation significantly improved anginal symptoms assessed by reduction in mean sublingual daily nitrate consumption, compared with controls (4.2 ± 2.7 nitrate tablets vs. 0.4 ± 0.5 nitrate tablets, p <0.001 and 4.5 ± 2.3 nitrate tablets vs. 4.4 ± 2.6 nitrate tablets, p = 0.87, respectively) and in mean CCS angina class compared with controls (3.5 ± 0.5 vs. 1.9 ± 0.3, p <0.0001 and 3.3 ± 0.6 vs. 3.5 ± 0.5, p = 0.89, respectively).ConclusionsExternal counterpulsation significantly improved vascular endothelial function in CAD patients with refractory angina pectoris, thereby suggesting that improved anginal symptoms may be the result of such a mechanism

Does the lipid-lowering peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors ligand bezafibrate prevent colon cancer in patients with coronary artery disease?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Epidemiologic studies have suggested that hypertriglyceridemia and insulin resistance are related to the development of colon cancer. Nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR), which play a central role in lipid and glucose metabolism, had been hypothesized as being involved in colon cancerogenesis. In animal studies the lipid-lowering PPAR ligand bezafibrate suppressed colonic tumors. However, the effect of bezafibrate on colon cancer development in humans is unknown. Therefore, we proposed to investigate a possible preventive effect of bezafibrate on the development of colon cancer in patients with coronary artery disease during a 6-year follow-up.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Our population included 3011 patients without any cancer diagnosis who were enrolled in the randomized, double blind Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) Study. The patients received either 400 mg of bezafibrate retard (1506 patients) or placebo (1505 patients) once a day. Cancer incidence data were obtained by matching a subject's identification numbers with the National Cancer Registry. Each matched record was checked for correct identification.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Development of new cancer (all types) was recorded in 177 patients: in 79 (5.25%) patients from the bezafibrate group vs. 98 (6.51%) from the placebo group. Development of colon cancer was recorded in 25 patients: in 8 (0.53%) patients from the bezafibrate group vs. 17 (1.13%) from the placebo group, (Fisher's exact test: one side p = 0.05; two side p = 0.07).</p> <p>A difference in the incidence of cancer was only detectable after a 4 year lag and progressively increased with continued follow-up. On multivariable analysis the colon cancer risk in patients who received bezafibrate tended to be lower with a hazard ratio of 0.47 and 95% confidence interval 0.2–1.1.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our data, derived from patients with coronary artery disease, support the hypothesis regarding a possible preventive effect of bezafibrate on the development of colon cancer.</p

Intracoronary Injection of In Situ Forming Alginate Hydrogel Reverses Left Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction in Swine

ObjectivesThis study sought to determine whether alginate biomaterial can be delivered effectively into the infarcted myocardium by intracoronary injection to prevent left ventricular (LV) remodeling early after myocardial infarction (MI).BackgroundAlthough injectable biomaterials can improve infarct healing and repair, the feasibility and effectiveness of intracoronary injection have not been studied.MethodsWe prepared a calcium cross-linked alginate solution that undergoes liquid to gel phase transition after deposition in infarcted myocardium. Anterior MI was induced in swine by transient balloon occlusion of left anterior descending coronary artery. At 4 days after MI, either alginate solution (2 or 4 ml) or saline was injected selectively into the infarct-related coronary artery. An additional group (n = 19) was treated with incremental volumes of biomaterial (1, 2, and 4 ml) or 2 ml saline and underwent serial echocardiography studies.ResultsExamination of hearts harvested after injection showed that the alginate crossed the infarcted leaky vessels and was deposited as hydrogel in the infarcted tissue. At 60 days, control swine experienced an increase in left ventricular (LV) diastolic area by 44%, LV systolic area by 45%, and LV mass by 35%. In contrast, intracoronary injection of alginate (2 and 4 ml) prevented and even reversed LV enlargement (p < 0.01). Post-mortem analysis showed that the biomaterial (2 ml) increased scar thickness by 53% compared with control (2.9 ± 0.1 mm vs. 1.9 ± 0.3 mm; p < 0.01) and was replaced by myofibroblasts and collagen.ConclusionsIntracoronary injection of alginate biomaterial is feasible, safe, and effective. Our findings suggest a new percutaneous intervention to improve infarct repair and prevent adverse remodeling after reperfused MI

Influence of anesthesia on hemodynamic assessment of mitral stenosis severity

Background: The treatment of choice for severe rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS) is balloon mitral valvuloplasty (BMV). Assessment of MS severity is usually performed by echocardiography. Before performing BMV, invasive hemodynamic assessment is also performed. The effect of anesthesia on the invasive assessment of MS severity has not been studied. The purpose of the present study was to assess changes in invasive hemodynamic measurement of MS severity before and after induction of general anesthesia. Methods: The medical files of 22 patients who underwent BMV between 2014 and 2020 were reviewed. Medical history, laboratory, echocardiographic and invasive measurements were collected. Anesthesia induction was performed with etomidate or propofol. Pre-procedural echocardiographic measurements of valve area using pressure half time, and continuity correlated well with invasive measurements using the Gorlin formula. Results: After induction of anesthesia the mean mitral valve gradient dropped by 2.4 mmHg (p = 0.153) and calculated mitral valve area (MVA) increased by 0.2 cm2 (p = 0.011). A wide variability in individual response was observed. While a drop in gradient was noted in 14 patients, it increased in 7. Gorlin derived MVA rose in most patients but dropped in 4. Assuming a calculated MVA of 1.5 cm2 and below to define clinically significant MS, 4 patients with pre-induction MVA of 1.5 cm2 or below had calculated MVA above 1.5 cm2 after induction. Conclusions: The impact of general anesthesia on the hemodynamic assessment of MS is heterogeneous and may lead to misclassification of MS severity

Pseudo-discordance mimicking low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis

Background: While the combination of a small aortic valve area (AVA) and low mean gradient is frequently labeled ‘low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS)’, there are two potential causes for this finding: underestimation of mean gradient and underestimation of AVA. Methods: In order to investigate the prevalence and causes of discordant echocardiographic findings in symptomatic patients with AS and normal left ventricular (LV) function, we evaluated 72 symptomatic patients with AS and normal LV function by comparing Doppler, invasive, computed tomography (CT) LV outflow tract (LVOT) area, and calcium score (CaSc). Results: Thirty-six patients had discordant echocardiographic findings (mean gradient &lt; 40 mmHg, AV area ≤ 1 cm2). Of those, 19 had discordant invasive measurements (true discordant [TD]) and 17 concordant (false discordant [FD]): In 12 of the FD the mean gradient was &gt; 30 mmHg; technical pitfalls were found in 10 patients (no reliable right parasternal Doppler in 6). LVOT area by echocardiography or CT could not differentiate between concordants and discordants nor between TD and FD (p = NS). CaSc was similar in concordants and FD (p = 0.3), and it was higher in true concordants than in TD (p = 0.005). CaSc positive predictive value for the correct diagnosis of severe AS was 95% for concordants and 93% for discordants. Conclusions: Discordant echocardiographic findings are commonly found in patients with symptomatic AS. Underestimation of the true mean gradient due to technical difficulties is an important cause of these discrepant findings. LVOT area by echocardiography or CT cannot differentiate between TD and FD. In the absence of a reliable and compete multi-window Doppler evaluation, patients should undergo CaSc assessment

Many Labs 5:Testing pre-data collection peer review as an intervention to increase replicability

Replication studies in psychological science sometimes fail to reproduce prior findings. If these studies use methods that are unfaithful to the original study or ineffective in eliciting the phenomenon of interest, then a failure to replicate may be a failure of the protocol rather than a challenge to the original finding. Formal pre-data-collection peer review by experts may address shortcomings and increase replicability rates. We selected 10 replication studies from the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (RP:P; Open Science Collaboration, 2015) for which the original authors had expressed concerns about the replication designs before data collection; only one of these studies had yielded a statistically significant effect (p < .05). Commenters suggested that lack of adherence to expert review and low-powered tests were the reasons that most of these RP:P studies failed to replicate the original effects. We revised the replication protocols and received formal peer review prior to conducting new replication studies. We administered the RP:P and revised protocols in multiple laboratories (median number of laboratories per original study = 6.5, range = 3?9; median total sample = 1,279.5, range = 276?3,512) for high-powered tests of each original finding with both protocols. Overall, following the preregistered analysis plan, we found that the revised protocols produced effect sizes similar to those of the RP:P protocols (?r = .002 or .014, depending on analytic approach). The median effect size for the revised protocols (r = .05) was similar to that of the RP:P protocols (r = .04) and the original RP:P replications (r = .11), and smaller than that of the original studies (r = .37). Analysis of the cumulative evidence across the original studies and the corresponding three replication attempts provided very precise estimates of the 10 tested effects and indicated that their effect sizes (median r = .07, range = .00?.15) were 78% smaller, on average, than the original effect sizes (median r = .37, range = .19?.50)