Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses : comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter study

The aim of this work was to test and compare the accuracy of five different morphological scoring systems to identify malignant ovarian masses in a prospective multicenter study. Four of the systems had previously been reported by Granberg, Sassone, De Priest and Lerner and the fifth is newly developed. A total of 330 ovarian neoplasms were collected in three different centers, which adopted the same diagnostic procedures. Of these, 261 masses were benign (mean diameter 50 \ub1 26 mm) and 69 were malignant (mean diameter 69 \ub1 33 mm) (prevalence 21%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the multicenter score was 0.84. This was significantly better than the areas of the other four scores which ranged from 0.72 to 0.75. The cut-off levels derived from the five ROC curves achieved a sensitivity that ranged from 74% (Sassone score) to 88% (De Priest score 64 5), and a specificity from 40% (De Priest) to 67% (multicenter); the highest positive predictive value was 41% (multicenter). With a cut-off level of 9, the accuracy of the multicenter score was significantly better than the scores of Granberg and De Priest (McNemar's test p < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained in 207 ovarian masses of 64 5 cm in mean diameter, and when 19 borderline and 11 stage I cancers only were considered. For the clinical purposes of a screening test we also checked a possible cut-off level of 64 8, which increased the sensitivity to 93% with a drop of specificity to 56%. With the use of the same criteria for the scores of the different authors, the following values were obtained for sensitivity: 96%, 81%, 93% and 90%; and for specificity: 23%, 56%, 28% and 49%. The multicenter score performed well at distinguishing malignant from benign lesions, and was better than the other four traditional scores, for both large and small masses. This was mainly due to the introduction of two criteria that allowed correction for typical dermoids and endohemorrhagic corpora lutea. A completely reliable differentiation of benign from malignant masses cannot be obtained by sonographic imaging alone

Rapamycin for treatment of type I autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (RAPYD-study): a randomized, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common form of cystic kidney disease. An inappropriate stimulation of mammalian target of rapamycin may represent the converging point in the molecular pathways leading to renal cyst growth. METHODS: The primary objectives of this prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial were to assess whether rapamycin may reduce the progressive increase in single cyst and total kidney volume in type I ADPKD and the decline in renal function and to identify the optimal rapamycin dose. Fifty-five patients with type I ADPKD were enrolled and randomized to receive ramipril (Group A), ramipril + high-dose rapamycin (Group B, trough level 6-8 ng/mL) and ramipril + low-dose rapamycin (Group C, trough levels 2-4 ng/mL). Rapamycin efficacy was monitored measuring p70 phosphorylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. RESULTS: Both rapamycin doses significantly reduced p70 phosphorylation. Nevertheless, total kidney volume increased in all groups after 24 months, although only in Groups A and B, was the final volume significantly higher compared with the baseline. Single cyst final volume was not significantly different in the three groups, although it was increased in Group A compared with the baseline, whereas in Groups B and C, it was significantly reduced. We did not observe any difference in renal function at 24 months among the three study groups. Group A presented a significant worsening of renal function that remained stable in both Groups B and C. CONCLUSIONS: Our study would suggest that rapamycin does not influence the progression of type I ADPKD, although the higher drug dose tested prevented both the increase in kidney volume and the worsening of renal function (RAPYD-study, EUDRACT No. 2007-006557-25)