5 research outputs found

    Long-Term Effects of Dietary Sodium Intake on Cytokines and Neurohormonal Activation in Patients With Recently Compensated Congestive Heart Failure

    No full text
    Abstract Background A growing body of evidence suggests that the fluid accumulation plays a key role in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) and that the inflammatory and neurohormonal activation contribute strongly to the progression of this disorder. Methods and Results The study evaluated the long-term effects of 2 different sodium diets on cytokines neurohormones, body hydration and clinical outcome in compensated HF outpatients (New York Heart Association Class II). A total of 173 patients (105 males, mean age 72.5±7) recently hospitalized for worsening advanced HF and discharged in normal hydration and in clinical compensation were randomized in 2 groups (double blind). In Group 1, 86 patients received a moderate restriction in sodium (120mmol to 2.8g/day) plus oral furosemide (125 to 250mg bid); in Group 2, 87 patients: received a low-sodium diet (80mmol to 1.8g/day) plus oral furosemide (125 to 250mg bid). Both groups were followed for 12 months and the treatment was associated with a drink intake of 1000mL daily. Neurohormonal (brain natriuretic peptide, aldosterone, plasma rennin activity) and cytokines values (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6) were significantly reduced with a significant increase of the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 at 12 months in normal, P < .0001) than low-sodium group. The low-sodium diet showed a significant activation of neurohormones and cytokines and worsening the body hydration, whereas moderate sodium restriction maintained dry weigh and improved outcome in the long term. Conclusions Our results appear to suggest a surprising efficacy of a new strategy to improve the chronic diuretic response by increasing Na intake and limiting fluid intake. This counterintuitive approach underlines the need for a better understanding of factors that regulate sodium and water handling in chronic congestive HF. A larger sample of patients and further studies are required to evaluate whether this is due to the high dose of diuretic used or the low-sodium diet. Key Words: Aldosterone, BNP, bioelectrical impedance, congestive heart failure, cytokines, furosemide, moderate sodium restriction, plasma renin activit

    Changes in estimating echocardiography pulmonary capillary wedge pressure after hypersaline plus furosemide versus furosemide alone in decompensated heart failure.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to verify the effects of hypertonic saline solution (HSS) plus a high furosemide dose and light restriction of sodium intake compared with a high-dose infusion of furosemide alone on pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), as determined by Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in patients suffering from decompensated heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients in New York Heart Association functional class IV, unresponsive to oral high doses of furosemide up to 250-500 mg/d and/or combinations of diuretics, with ejection fraction <40%, serum creatinine <2 mg/dL, blood urea nitrogen ≤60 mg/dL, reduced urinary volume (<500 mL/24 h), and low natriuresis (<60 mEq/24 h) were randomized into 2 groups (double blind). The first group received a furosemide infusion (250 mg) plus HSS (150 mL 3.0% Na) bid and light Na restriction (120 mmol), and the second group received furosemide infusion (250 mg) twice daily, and low Na diet (80 mmol). The fluid intake of both groups was restricted (1 L/d). Body weight, whole-body bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), 24-hour urinary volume, and serum and urinary laboratory parameters were measured daily. Estimations of echocardiographic PCWP (Echo-PCWP) were detected on entry, 1 hour after concluding the initial treatment, and 6 days thereafter. A total of 133 patients (47 women and 86 men), aged 65-82 years, met the entry criteria.The HSS group revealed a significant increase in daily diuresis, natriuresis, and serum sodium compared with the furosemide group. Six days after treatment, renal function was significantly improved in the HSS group. Both groups showed a significant reduction in Echo-PCWP, but the HHS group revealed a faster reduction and significant lower values at 6 days compared with the group taking furosemide alone. We observed a positive correlation between values of Echo-PCWP and BNP and an inverse correlation between BIA parameters and Echo-PCWP. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the combination of high diuretic dose and HSS infusion plus light restriction in dietary sodium intake determine a more rapid and significant hemodynamic stabilization through the improvement of echo-PCWP, BNP levels, and BIA parameters than the group treated without HSS

    One-year renal and cardiac effects of bisoprolol versus losartan in recently diagnosed hypertensive patients: a randomized, double-blind study.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hypertension is a significant cause of chronic renal injury and its effective treatment is capable of reducing the rate of renal failure. beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) have been reported to induce a deterioration in renal function, while several data have indicated a renoprotective effect of treatment with the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist losartan. Previous studies of the interaction between the selective beta(1)-blocker bisoprolol and kidney function were performed only for short- and medium-term periods. The aim of this study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and renal and cardiac haemodynamic effects of bisoprolol with those of losartan over a 1-year time period in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: Seventy-two patients (40 males) with recently diagnosed uncomplicated (European Society of Hypertension [ESH] criteria stage 1-2) hypertension (mean +/- SD age 52 +/- 12 years) were enrolled in the study. After a run-in period of 14 days on placebo, the patients were randomized in a double-blind, prospective study to receive either bisoprolol 5 mg or losartan 50 mg, administered once daily for 1 year. At recruitment and 12 months after treatment, cardiac output and renal haemodynamics and function were evaluated by echocardiography and radionuclide studies, respectively. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline clinical data, including glomerular filtration rate and blood pressure, between the two treatment groups. At 1 year, blood pressure had decreased significantly (p < 0.001) with both treatments, and heart rate was reduced only in the group taking bisoprolol. The long-term effects on renal haemodynamics and cardiac function were similar with both drugs, the only change being a significant reduction in the filtration fraction for each group. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that both bisoprolol and losartan are effective agents for the treatment of patients with recently diagnosed ESH stage 1-2 hypertension. Over a 1-year period, both agents maintained good renal and cardiac performance and haemodynamics
    corecore