33 research outputs found

    Silica and renal diseases: no longer a problem in the 21st century?

    No full text
    Silicosis and other occupational diseases are still important even in the most developed countries. In fact, at present, silica exposure may be a risk factor for human health not only for workers but also for consumers. Furthermore, this exposure is associated with many other different disorders besides pulmonary silicosis, such as progressive systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, dermatomyositis, glomerulonephritis and vasculitis. The relationships between these silica-related diseases need to be clarified, but pathogenic responses to silica are likely to be mediated by interaction of silica particles with the immune system, mainly by activation of macrophages. As regards renal pathology, there is no single specific clinical or laboratory finding of silica-induced nephropathy: renal involvement may occur as a toxic effect or in a context of autoimmune disease, and silica damage may act as an additive factor on an existing, well-established renal disease. An occupational history must be obtained for all renal patients, checking particularly for exposure to silica, heavy metals, and solvents

    The concept of 'glomerulonephritis'. the fascinating history of evolution and emergence of a specialist's nosology focus on Italy and Torino.

    No full text
    Though the term 'nephritis' first appeared in the 19th century, this word did not bear the same meaning as it does today; indeed, for many years it was used to indicate 'renal diseases' (in the sense of Bright's disease) in a larger sense. This review summarizes the long gestation of the concept of 'glomerulonephritis' from the prehistory of medicine up to the beginning of the second half of the 20th century with emphasis on Italy and, in particular, on Torino, which was the capital of the Kingdom of Italy from 1861 to 1865. To the best of our kowledge, this is the first study reporting an epidemiology survey of Bright's disease in Italy from 1880 up to 1960. Towards the end of the 19th century, Bright's disease accounted for 26 deaths/year/10(5) population (in comparison with more than 200 from tuberculosis) in Italy, roughly paralleling that reported in the USA. At the beginning of the 20th century, Bright's disease was the seventh cause of death (almost 1% of total deaths) in Italy. Furthermore, in Italy, as elsewhere, autopsy studies showed a higher percentage of deaths attributed to Bright's disease (5-7%) in comparison with those obtained from vital statistics. In 1960, just before the beginning of renal replacement therapy, Bright's disease accounted for 15.7 deaths/year/10(5) population (= 1.46% of all deaths), roughly paralleling that reported in the United Kingdom (13.8/10(5) population = 1.25% of deaths). Probably, it was difficult to recognize the real incidence of chronic renal diseases leading to death in the 1960s, and vital statistics were able to furnish only approximate estimates. However, noteworthy is the fact that these values were very close to those estimated as being the annual need for renal replacement therapy (10-20 cases/year/10(5) population)

    The concept of 'glomerulonephritis'. the fascinating history of evolution and emergence of a specialist's nosology focus on Italy and Torino.

    No full text
    Though the term \u2018nephritis\u2019 first appeared in the 19th century, this word did not bear the same meaning as it does today; indeed, for many years it was used to indicate \u2018renal diseases\u2019 (in the sense of Bright\u2019s disease) in a larger sense. This review summarizes the long gestation of the concept of \u2018glomerulonephritis\u2019 from the prehistory of medicine up to the beginning of the second half of the 20th century with emphasis on Italy and, in particular, on Torino, which was the capital of the Kingdom of Italy from 1861 to 1865. To the best of our kowledge, this is the first study reporting an epidemiology survey of Bright\u2019s disease in Italy from 1880 up to 1960. Towards the end of the 19th century, Bright\u2019s disease accounted for 26 deaths/year/105 population (in comparison with more than 200 from tuberculosis) in Italy, roughly paralleling that reported in the USA. At the beginning of the 20th century, Bright\u2019s disease was the seventh cause of death (almost 1% of total deaths) in Italy. Furthermore, in Italy, as elsewhere, autopsy studies showed a higher percentage of deaths attributed to Bright\u2019s disease (5\u20137%) in comparison with those obtained from vital statistics. In 1960, just before the beginning of renal replacement therapy, Bright\u2019s disease accounted for 15.7 deaths/year/105 population (= 1.46% of all deaths), roughly paralleling that reported in the United Kingdom (13.8/105 population = 1.25% of deaths). Probably, it was difficult to recognize the real incidence of chronic renal diseases leading to death in the 1960s, and vital statistics were able to furnish only approximate estimates. However, noteworthy is the fact that these values were very close to those estimated as being the annual need for renal replacement therapy (10\u201320 cases/year/105 population)
    corecore