Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae meningitis: A case report

WOS: 000384332700020PubMed ID: 2581740

Is Every Foot Wound a Diabetic Foot Infection in Diabetic Patients? A Case of Kaposi Sarcoma

WOS: 000511368300018[No abstract available

Hodgkin's Lymphoma Mimicking Chronic Osteomyelitis

WOS:000632655600001[No Abstract Available

Intralesional epidermal growth factor therapy fordiabetic foot ulcers: an evaluation of 15 cases

Background/aim: Intralesional recombinant epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a new treatment approach for diabetic foot ulcer, approved in 2006. EGF therapy is given as an adjunct to the standard treatment regimen of antibiotics, surgery, and hyperbaric oxygen. EGF accelerates the healing of diabetic foot ulcers and reduces healing time. This single-center study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of intralesional EGF therapy in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Materials and methods: We present the data of the follow-up patients treated in our clinics. Fifteen patients with diabetic foot ulcers or infections, who had been followed up and treated in our clinics, were included in this retrospective study. All patients were administered intralesional injections of 75 µg of EGF after treatment for infection on their diabetic foot ulcers, three times a week on alternate days. The patients were monitored with respect to treatment response and side effects of EGF. Results: Thirteen patients (86.7%) developed new granulation tissue, 10 patients (66.7%) had complete wound closure, and three patients (20%) showed partial wound closure. No serious side effects requiring discontinuation of EGF therapy were observed. A total of twenty-one bacterial agents were isolated in thirteen patients, and no bacterial growth was observed in the tissue cultures of two patients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common isolated infectious agent in the tissue cultures (n: 6, 28%). Conclusion: Intralesional injection of EGF on top of the standard treatment regimen appears to be a useful adjuvant therapy option in selected patients.Background/aim: Intralesional recombinant epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a new treatment approach for diabetic foot ulcer, approved in 2006. EGF therapy is given as an adjunct to the standard treatment regimen of antibiotics, surgery, and hyperbaric oxygen. EGF accelerates the healing of diabetic foot ulcers and reduces healing time. This single-center study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of intralesional EGF therapy in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Materials and methods: We present the data of the follow-up patients treated in our clinics. Fifteen patients with diabetic foot ulcers or infections, who had been followed up and treated in our clinics, were included in this retrospective study. All patients were administered intralesional injections of 75 µg of EGF after treatment for infection on their diabetic foot ulcers, three times a week on alternate days. The patients were monitored with respect to treatment response and side effects of EGF. Results: Thirteen patients (86.7%) developed new granulation tissue, 10 patients (66.7%) had complete wound closure, and three patients (20%) showed partial wound closure. No serious side effects requiring discontinuation of EGF therapy were observed. A total of twenty-one bacterial agents were isolated in thirteen patients, and no bacterial growth was observed in the tissue cultures of two patients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common isolated infectious agent in the tissue cultures (n: 6, 28%). Conclusion: Intralesional injection of EGF on top of the standard treatment regimen appears to be a useful adjuvant therapy option in selected patients

Ceftaroline versus vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in an experimental MRSA meningitis model

WOS: 000572257300022PubMed: 32068093Objectives: the aim of this study was to compare the antibacterial activity of ceftaroline versus vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) meningitis in an experimental rabbit meningitis model. Methods: the antibacterial activity of ceftaroline was compared with vancomycin in the treatment of meningitis induced by MRSA strain ATCC 43300 in an experimental rabbit meningitis model. Quantitative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures were performed at the beginning of antibiotic treatment and 24 h and 73 h after the first antibiotic dose. Furthermore, in vitro time-kill data were investigated at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h in sterile human serum. Results: the difference between the control group versus both treatment groups was significant when comparing the decrease in colony counts in CSF both at 24 h and 73 h after the first antibiotic dose (P < 0.05). At the end of the experiment, there was a significant difference in survival between both the ceftaroline-treated group and the vancomycin-treated group versus the control group, but not between the two treatment groups. Conclusion: These results suggest that the antibacterial activity of both ceftaroline and vancomycin are similar in the treatment of MRSA meningitis in an experimental rabbit meningitis model. (C) 2020 the Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.Ege University (Izmir, Turkey)Ege UniversityThis study was funded by Ege University (Izmir, Turkey)