16 research outputs found

    Molecular Profiling of the Drosophila Antenna Reveals Conserved Genes Underlying Olfaction in Insects

    No full text
    Repellent odors are widely used to prevent insect-borne diseases, making it imperative to identify the conserved molecular underpinnings of their olfactory systems. Currently, little is known about the molecules supporting odor signaling beyond the odor receptors themselves. Most known molecules function in one of two classes of olfactory sensilla, single-walled or double-walled, which have differing morphology and odor response profiles. Here, we took two approaches to discover novel genes that contribute to insect olfaction in the periphery. We transcriptionally profiled Drosophila melanogaster amos mutants that lack trichoid and basiconic sensilla, the single-walled sensilla in this species. This revealed 187 genes whose expression is enriched in these sensilla, including pickpocket ion channels and neuromodulator GPCRs that could mediate signaling pathways unique to single-walled sensilla. For our second approach, we computationally identified 141 antennal-enriched (AE) genes that are more than ten times as abundant in D. melanogaster antennae as in other tissues or whole-body extracts, and are thus likely to play a role in olfaction. We identified unambiguous orthologs of AE genes in the genomes of four distantly related insect species, and most identified orthologs were expressed in the antenna of these species. Further analysis revealed that nearly half of the 141 AE genes are localized specifically to either single or double-walled sensilla. Functional annotation suggests the AE genes include signaling molecules and enzymes that could be involved in odorant degradation. Together, these two resources provide a foundation for future studies investigating conserved mechanisms of odor signaling

    An RNA-Seq Screen of the <i>Drosophila</i> Antenna Identifies a Transporter Necessary for Ammonia Detection

    No full text
    <div><p>Many insect vectors of disease detect their hosts through olfactory cues, and thus it is of great interest to understand better how odors are encoded. However, little is known about the molecular underpinnings that support the unique function of coeloconic sensilla, an ancient and conserved class of sensilla that detect amines and acids, including components of human odor that are cues for many insect vectors. Here, we generate antennal transcriptome databases both for wild type <i>Drosophila</i> and for a mutant that lacks coeloconic sensilla. We use these resources to identify genes whose expression is highly enriched in coeloconic sensilla, including many genes not previously implicated in olfaction. Among them, we identify an ammonium transporter gene that is essential for ammonia responses in a class of coeloconic olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs), but is not required for responses to other odorants. Surprisingly, the transporter is not expressed in ORNs, but rather in neighboring auxiliary cells. Thus, our data reveal an unexpected non-cell autonomous role for a component that is essential to the olfactory response to ammonia. The defective response observed in a <i>Drosophila</i> mutant of this gene is rescued by its <i>Anopheles</i> ortholog, and orthologs are found in virtually all insect species examined, suggesting that its role is conserved. Taken together, our results provide a quantitative analysis of gene expression in the primary olfactory organ of <i>Drosophila</i>, identify molecular components of an ancient class of olfactory sensilla, and reveal that auxiliary cells, and not simply ORNs, play an essential role in the coding of an odor that is a critical host cue for many insect vectors of human disease.</p></div

    The loss of ammonia response localizes to the <i>Amt</i> gene.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Traces on the left show that the responses to a 500 ms pulse of 0.1% ammonia are similar in flies heterozygous for the <i>Amt<sup>1</sup></i> transposon and the <i>Df(3R)BSC471</i> deficiency that removes ∼30 kb including <i>Amt</i> and nine other genes. In contrast, <i>Amt<sup>1</sup></i>/<i>Df(3R)BSC471</i> flies have greatly reduced responses to ammonia (n = 9 each, p<0.0001). Averaged data are shown in the graph on the right. (B) The lack of response to 0.1% ammonia in ac1 sensilla from <i>Amt<sup>1</sup></i> flies is rescued by the addition of a genomic fragment containing <i>Amt</i> and the neighboring gene <i>Hsc70-4</i> (n = 8 each, p<0.0001). (C) The response to ammonia in <i>Amt<sup>1</sup></i> mutant flies is also rescued by transgenic expression of <i>UAS-Amt</i> under the control of an <i>Amt-Gal4</i> promoter (n = 9 each, p<0.0001).</p

    Chemosensory gene expression in the wild-type antennal third segment.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Third antennal segment (arrowhead) on a <i>Drosophila</i> head. (B) Scanning electron micrograph of the antennal surface with a coeloconic sensillum (C), trichoid sensillum (T) and small basiconic sensillum (SB) labeled. (C) Diagram of a generic sensillum containing an olfactory receptor neuron (ORN) whose dendrite is surrounded by sensillar lymph. The sensillum and antennal surface is covered with a cuticle, and pores in the sensillum cuticle permit airborne odors to enter the sensillum lymph. The sensillum is separated from other sensilla by the epithelium. Auxiliary cells, including tormogen (To), trichogen (Tr) and thecogen (Th) cells, surround the ORN. (D) Members of the <i>Or</i> and (E) <i>IR</i> olfactory receptor gene families detected in the Canton-S (CS) third antennal segment with at least 1 read per million mapped reads (RPM) in each of three samples. Genes are listed by decreasing reads per million mapped reads per kilobase of gene length (RPKM). Two <i>IR</i> genes, <i>IR75b</i> and <i>IR75c,</i> were annotated as a single gene, <i>CG14586,</i> at the time of the gene mapping (<a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004810#pgen.1004810.s010" target="_blank">Dataset S1</a>), and are therefore represented by a single bar in the graph. (F) <i>Gr</i> genes. (G) <i>Obp</i> genes. (H) <i>Trp</i> family genes. (A) is from <a href="http://cedar.bio.indiana.edu/~ggrumbli/highrespackage" target="_blank">http://cedar.bio.indiana.edu/~ggrumbli/highrespackage</a>, (B) is from <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004810#pgen.1004810-Shanbhag1" target="_blank">[3]</a>, and (C) is adapted from <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004810#pgen.1004810-Gu1" target="_blank">[116]</a>.</p

    The <i>Amt<sup>1</sup></i> defect is restricted to the ammonia response of ac1 sensilla.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Odor responses of ac1 sensilla in <i>Amt<sup>1</sup></i>. Ammonia, 2-oxovaleric acid, and pyrrolidine each activate one of the three ORNs in ac1; only the ammonia response was impaired (n = 10–11, p<0.0001). (B–D) Response profiles of other sensillar types appeared normal (n = 8–9 each).</p

    Expression of <i>Amt.</i>

    No full text
    <p>(A) RT-PCR analysis of <i>Amt</i> expression in CS. <i>Synaptogmin</i> was used as a positive control. (B) Whole-mount confocal image of a third antennal segment of an <i>Amt-GAL4; UAS-mCD8::GFP</i> fly. GFP expression is seen in large, amorphous auxiliary cells, but not in neurons. White arrowheads indicate the sacculus here and in panels E and F. Scale bar  = 30 µm. (C) Confocal image of an <i>in situ</i> hybridization to an antennal section from an <i>Amt-GAL4; UAS-mCD8::GFP</i> fly using antisense probes for <i>Amt</i> (red) and <i>GFP</i> (green). The two probes co-localize. (D, E, G, H), confocal images of antennal sections labeled with an antisense probe for <i>Amt</i> (red) and an antibody against GFP (green) driven by (D) <i>IR76b-Gal4</i>, (E) <i>IR8a-Gal4</i>, (G) <i>IR92a-Gal4</i>, and (H) <i>IR76a-Gal4</i>. <i>IR76b-Gal4</i> and <i>IR8a-Gal4</i> are co-receptors that label at least one ORN in each surface coeloconic sensillum type (ac1–4). <i>IR8a-Gal4</i> also labels coeloconic ORNs in the third chamber of the sacculus. <i>Amt</i> is detected in larger neighboring auxiliary cells in a subset of the coeloconic sensilla. (F) Confocal image of an <i>in situ</i> hybridization to an antennal section from a CS fly using antisense probes for <i>Amt</i> (red) and <i>Obp84a</i> (green). <i>Amt</i> is expressed in different auxiliary cells from those that express <i>Obp84a</i>, which is also expressed in coeloconic sensilla. (G) Expression of <i>Amt</i> on the antennal surface is found surrounding the IR92a ammonia receptor-expressing neurons, which are in ac1. (H) <i>Amt</i> is not detected in ac4 sensilla, which contain ORNs that express <i>IR76a</i>. (I, J) Higher magnification images of (F) and (G) respectively.</p

    Functional categorization of 250 genes depleted in <i>ato.</i>

    No full text
    <p>(A) The ten genes that show the most signification depletion in <i>ato</i>, based on p-value. Each is color-coded according to the categories in panel (B). (B) Categorization of the 250 genes that show at least four-fold reduction in <i>ato</i> with a FDR <0.01. Putative functions were determined by examination of automated gene annotation and BLAST searches to identify similar proteins. (C) Gene Ontology (GO) term analysis using the program AmiGO identified four level two terms that were significantly enriched among the 250 <i>ato</i>-depleted genes compared to all <i>D. melanogaster</i> genes listed in FlyBase. See <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004810#pgen.1004810.s007" target="_blank">Figure S7</a> for the complete analysis of all level two GO terms. (D) Significance of enrichment of lower level terms, which form a subset of higher level terms (<i>e.g.</i> “detection of stimulus” is a subset of “response to stimulus”). Lower level terms were selected to illustrate the types of functions most enriched in the dataset. The number of <i>ato</i>-depleted genes annotated with each GO term is indicated. We note that the ion channel genes depleted in <i>ato</i> include two members of the <i>ppk</i> family, <i>ppk25</i> and <i>ppk10</i>, two members of the <i>Trp</i> family, <i>nanchung</i> and <i>inactive</i>, and four potassium channel genes: <i>shaw-like (shawl), TWIK-related acid-sensitive K<sup>+</sup> channel (Task7), Inwardly rectifying potassium channel 1 (Irk1)</i>, and <i>CG1756</i>. Depleted genes described by “transmembrane signaling receptor activity” included six GPCRs: <i>5-HT2, 5-HT7, CG43795, frizzled 3 (fz3), Pigment-dispersing factor receptor (Pdfr),</i> and <i>CG18208</i>.</p
    corecore