Topographic and Clinical Analysis of Anterior Circulation Strokes - A Study of 82 Cases.

Stroke is the most common life threatening neurological disease and the third leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer, accounting for 1 of every 15 deaths. In the elderly, the segment of the population in which stroke occurs most frequently, it is the leading cause of disability requiring long term institutionalization. Faced with an acute stroke, the physician must determine the cause, estimate the severity, consider the possibility of progression or recurrence and seek ways of stabilizing or reversing it. Investigations should be designed to assist clinicians in subcategorizing patients at three specific levels (1) separating strokes from non strokes such as cerebral tumours and subdrual hematoma (2) distinguishing hemorrhage from infarction and (3) identifying specific pathophysiological sub types of cerebral infarction. Because the possibility of worsening or recurrence is paramount, speedy efforts should be made to arrive at a diagnosis of stroke mechanism using this approach. The ideal test should be inexpensive, noninvasive, accessible, accurate and informative. 82 patients, both male and female were included in the study satisfying the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Analysis of their CT brains resulted in the following conclusions. 1. Infarcts in the anterior circulation fit into 6 different patterns namely a. Large territorial or cortical infarcts, b. Large / discrete subcortical infarcts involving he striatocapsular and corona radiata region. c. Large fragmentary infarcts in the MCA/ACA territory, d. Small fragmentary infarcts in the MCA/ACA territory,e. Cortical borderzone infarcts and subcortical borderzone i.e linear corona radiata and linear centrum semiovale infarcts, f. Discrete corona-radiata and discrete centrum semiovale infarcts, Among the 6, pattern 5 or border zone infarcts are most common. 2. Two or more of these patterns can co-exist, though there are no definite combinations. Combinations vary depending on the proposed pathophysiology of stroke. 3. Cortical borderzone infarcts usually thought to be due to haemodynamic failure can be embolic in origin too. 4. Heart disease can result in infarcts in any pattern or their combinations thereof. 5. Pattern1 cortical infarcts and pattern 2 large striatocapsular infarcts show sudden peak clinically with a subsequent static or regressive course. 6. Progressive strokes are usually associated with combinations of different patterns in CT Brain 7. Sensorium at onset is associated more with the size of the infarct than with a pattern of infarct. It is difficult to correctly guess the artery involved in anterior circulation strokes from the pattern of CT Brain involvement and the clinical course, though certain patterns do indicate possible aetiologies

Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Predicting outcome in acute stroke with large vessel occlusion:application and validation of MR PREDICTS in the ESCAPE-NA1 population

Background: Predicting outcome after endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke is challenging. We aim to investigate differences between predicted and observed outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular treatment and to evaluate the performance of a validated outcome prediction score. Patients and methods: MR PREDICTS is an outcome prediction tool based on a logistic regression model designed to predict the treatment benefit of endovascular treatment based on the MR CLEAN and HERMES populations. ESCAPE-NA1 is a randomized trial of nerinetide vs. placebo in patients with acute stroke and large vessel occlusion. We applied MR PREDICTS to patients in the control arm of ESCAPE-NA1. Model performance was assessed by calculating its discriminative ability and calibration. Results: Overall, 556/1105 patients (50.3%) in the ESCAPE-NA1-trial were randomized to the control arm, 435/556 (78.2%) were treated within 6 h of symptom onset. Good outcome (modified Rankin scale 0–2) at 3 months was achieved in 275/435 patients (63.2%), the predicted probability of good outcome was 52.5%. Baseline characteristics were similar in the study and model derivation cohort except for age (ESCAPE-NA1: mean: 70 y vs. HERMES: 66 y), hypertension (72% vs. 57%), and collaterals (good collaterals, 15% vs. 44%). Compared to HERMES we observed higher rates of successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3, ESCAPE-NA1: 87% vs. HERMES: 71%) and faster times from symptom onset to reperfusion (median: 201 min vs. 286 min). Model performance was good, indicated by a c-statistic of 0.76 (95%confidence interval: 0.71–0.81). Conclusion: Outcome-prediction using models created from HERMES data, based on information available in the emergency department underestimated the actual outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion receiving endovascular treatment despite overall good model performance, which might be explained by differences in quality of and time to reperfusion. These findings underline the importance of timely and successful reperfusion for functional outcomes in acute stroke patients.</p

Leptomeningeal collaterals are associated with modifiable metabolic risk factors

We seek to identify potentially modifiable determinants associated with variability in leptomeningeal collateral status in patients with acute ischemic stroke

Predicting outcome in acute stroke with large vessel occlusion:application and validation of MR PREDICTS in the ESCAPE-NA1 population

Background: Predicting outcome after endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke is challenging. We aim to investigate differences between predicted and observed outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular treatment and to evaluate the performance of a validated outcome prediction score. Patients and methods: MR PREDICTS is an outcome prediction tool based on a logistic regression model designed to predict the treatment benefit of endovascular treatment based on the MR CLEAN and HERMES populations. ESCAPE-NA1 is a randomized trial of nerinetide vs. placebo in patients with acute stroke and large vessel occlusion. We applied MR PREDICTS to patients in the control arm of ESCAPE-NA1. Model performance was assessed by calculating its discriminative ability and calibration. Results: Overall, 556/1105 patients (50.3%) in the ESCAPE-NA1-trial were randomized to the control arm, 435/556 (78.2%) were treated within 6 h of symptom onset. Good outcome (modified Rankin scale 0–2) at 3 months was achieved in 275/435 patients (63.2%), the predicted probability of good outcome was 52.5%. Baseline characteristics were similar in the study and model derivation cohort except for age (ESCAPE-NA1: mean: 70 y vs. HERMES: 66 y), hypertension (72% vs. 57%), and collaterals (good collaterals, 15% vs. 44%). Compared to HERMES we observed higher rates of successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3, ESCAPE-NA1: 87% vs. HERMES: 71%) and faster times from symptom onset to reperfusion (median: 201 min vs. 286 min). Model performance was good, indicated by a c-statistic of 0.76 (95%confidence interval: 0.71–0.81). Conclusion: Outcome-prediction using models created from HERMES data, based on information available in the emergency department underestimated the actual outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion receiving endovascular treatment despite overall good model performance, which might be explained by differences in quality of and time to reperfusion. These findings underline the importance of timely and successful reperfusion for functional outcomes in acute stroke patients.</p

Door‐to‐Puncture: A Practical Metric for Capturing and Enhancing System Processes Associated With Endovascular Stroke Care, Preliminary Results From the Rapid Reperfusion Registry

Background: In 2011, the Brain Attack Coalition proposed door‐to‐treatment times of 2 hours as a benchmark for patients undergoing intra‐arterial therapy (IAT). We designed the Rapid Reperfusion Registry to capture the percentage of stroke patients who meet the target and its impact on outcomes. Methods and Results: This is a retrospective analysis of anterior circulation patients treated with IAT within 9 hours of symptom onset. Data was collected from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012 at 2 centers and from July 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 at 7 centers. Short “Door‐to‐Puncture” (D2P) time was hypothesized to be associated with good patient outcomes. A total of 478 patients with a mean age of 68±14 years and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) of 18 (IQR 14 to 21) were analyzed. The median times for IAT delivery were 234 minutes (IQR 163 to 304) for “last known normal‐to‐groin puncture” time (LKN‐to‐GP) and 112 minutes (IQR 68 to 176) for D2P time. The overall good outcome rate was 39.7% for the entire cohort. In a multivariable model adjusting for age, NIHSS, hypertension, diabetes, reperfusion status, and symptomatic hemorrhage, both short LKN‐to‐GP (OR 0.996; 95% CI [0.993 to 0.998]; P<0.001) and short D2P times (OR 0.993, 95% CI [0.990 to 0.996]; P<0.001) were associated with good outcomes. Only 52% of all patients in the registry achieved the targeted D2P time of 2 hours. Conclusions: The time interval of D2P presents a clinically relevant time frame by which system processes can be targeted to streamline the delivery of IAT care nationally. At present, there is much opportunity to enhance outcomes through reducing D2P

Rapid alteplase administration improves functional outcomes in patients with stroke due to large vessel occlusions

Background and Purpose: We report the relation of onset-to-treatment time and door-to-needle time with functional outcomes and mortality among patients with ischemic stroke with imaging-proven large vessel occlusion treated with intravenous alteplase. Methods: Individual patient-level data from the HERMES (Highly Effective Reperfusion Evaluated in Multiple Endovascular Stroke Trials) collaboration were pooled from 7 trials that randomized patients to mechanical thrombectomy added to best medical therapy versus best medical therapy alone. Analysis was restricted to patients who received alteplase directly at the endovascular hospital. The primary outcome was disability defined on the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months. Results: Among 601 patients, mean age was 66.0 years (SD, 13.9), 50% were women, and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 17. Onset-to-treatment time was median 125 minutes (interquartile range, 90–170). Door-to-treatment time was median 38 minutes (interquartile range, 26–55). Each 60-minute onset-to-treatment time delay was associated with greater disability at 90 days; the odds of functional independence (modified Rankin Scale, 0–2) at 90 days was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66–1.03). With each 60-minute delay in door-to-needle time; the odds of functional independence was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.37–0.81) at 90 days. The absolute decline in the rate of excellent outcome (modified Rankin Scale, 0–1 at 90 days) was 20.3 per 1000 patients treated per 15-minute delay in door-to-needle time. The adjusted absolute risk difference for a door-to-needle time &lt;30 minutes versus 30 to 60 minutes was 19.3% for independent outcome (number-needed-to-treat ≈5 to gain 1 additional good outcome). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 3.4% of patients, without a significant time dependency: odds ratio, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.43–1.28). Conclusions: Faster intravenous thrombolysis delivery is associated with less disability at 3 months among patients with large vessel occlusion

Efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with M2 segment middle cerebral artery occlusions: meta-analysis of data from the HERMES Collaboration

Background: The Society of Neurointerventional Surgery revised its operational definition of emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) recently to include proximal M2 segment middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions. We sought to assess the benefit of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) over best medical care for M2 segment MCA occlusion. Methods: Patient level data from trials in the HERMES Collaboration were included. The HERMES core laboratory identified patients with M2 segment MCA occlusions and further classified them as proximal versus distal, anterior versus posterior division, and dominant versus co-dominant versus non-dominant. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0–2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) rates at end of procedure, 90-day mRS shift, 90-day mRS 0–1, 24 hours National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 0–2, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and death. Results: 130 patients with M2 MCA (proximal location n=116 vs distal n=14, anterior division n=72 vs posterior n=58, dominant n=73 vs co-dominant n=50 vs non-dominant n=7) were included. Successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b or 3) among those undergoing EVT was seen in 59.2% of patients. Treatment effect favored EVT (adjusted OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.28, p=0.03) for 90-day mRS 0–2 (58.2% EVT vs 39.7% control). Direction of benefit favored EVT for other outcomes. Treatment effect favoring EVT was maximal in patients with proximal M2 segment MCA occlusions (n=116, adjusted OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.37) and in dominant M2 segment MCA occlusions (n=73, adjusted OR 4.08, 95% CI 1.08 to 15.48). No sICH (0%) was observed in patients treated with EVT compared with five (7.9%) in the control arm. Conclusion: Patients with proximal M2 segment MCA occlusions eligible for EVT trial protocols benefited from EVT