Mental Distress and Mental Health Services Receipt in Foreign-Born Survivors of Cancer: a National Health Interview Survey Analysis

e19001 Background: There is a greater burden of mental illness, in survivors of cancer compared with the general population. Though mental health interventions may reduce mental distress and improve subsequent oncological outcomes, there are disparities in mental health service (MHS) receipt in immigrant populations. Therefore, we examined contemporary patterns of mental distress and mental health service receipt by immigrant status in cancer survivors in the United States. Methods: Data are collected in non-institutionalized civilian adults by the US National Health Interview Survey. For this study, harmonized data of participants reporting a cancer diagnosis were extracted from the Integrated Health Interview Series from 2009-2018. Sample weight-adjusted estimates of mental distress were defined by the validated Kessler 6 (K6). MHS receipt in the past 12 months was estimated, stratified by K6 status. Multivariable logistic regression defined adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95CI) for the odds of MHS receipt, with birth status (US vs. non-US) as the primary independent variable of interest. Results: Among 14,653 adult survivors of cancer and 207,018 adults without cancer, 4.16% vs. 3.01% had K6 >13, respectively (AOR 0.96, 95CI 0.87-1.07, P = 0.504). Among survivors of cancer, younger age, female sex, and white race were associated with K6>13, while factors associated with lower MHS receipt included non-US born status, non-white race, and older age. The distribution of severe mental illness (K6>13) did not differ by place of birth. However, non-US birth status was associated with lower MHS receipt among survivors of cancer with K6 13 (9.43% vs 37.8%, AOR 0.19, 95CI 0.08-0.45, P < 0.001) (Pinteraction= 0.002). Conclusions: In this large contemporary cross-sectional survey, though there was a similar distribution of mental distress in survivors of cancer based on birth status, non-US born adults with severe mental distress (K613) were 81% less likely to receive MHS relative to US born adults. These data suggest that immigrant survivors of cancer who suffer from severe mental distress may be a greater risk not receiving appropriate MHS, which could lead to subsequent adverse outcome. Given the demonstrated gap in use of MHS in non-US born adults with cancer and severe mental distress, increased efforts are needed to screen for mental illness and the need for MHS in immigrant populations

Relative Timing of Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation for Prostate Cancer and Implications for Treatment During the COVID-19 Pandemic

This cohort study uses National Cancer Database data from 2004 to 2014 to examine the association between overall survival and timing of radiotherapy relative to androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer

Disparities in Refusal of Locoregional Treatment for Prostate Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: We assessed sociodemographic factors associated with and survival implications of refusal of potentially survival-prolonging locoregional treatment (LT, including radiotherapy and surgery) despite provider recommendation among men with localized prostate adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2004-2015) identified men with TxN0M0 prostate cancer who either received or refused LT despite provider recommendation. Multivariable logistic regression defined adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CI of refusing LT, with sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Models were stratified by low-risk and intermediate- or high-risk (IR or HR) disease, with a separate interaction analysis between race and risk group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard ratios compared overall survival (OS) among men who received versus refused LT. RESULTS: Of 887,839 men (median age 64 years, median follow-up 6.14 years), 2,487 (0.28%) refused LT. Among men with IR or HR disease (n = 651,345), Black and Asian patients were more likely to refuse LT than White patients (0.35% v 0.29% v 0.17%; Black v White AOR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.01; P < .001; Asian v White AOR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.06; P = .027, race * risk group interaction P < .001). Later year of diagnosis, community facility type, noninsurance or Medicaid, and older age were also associated with increased odds of LT refusal, overall and when stratifying by risk group. For men with IR or HR disease, LT refusal was associated with worse OS (5-year OS 80.1% v 91.5%, HR, 1.65, P < .001). CONCLUSION: LT refusal has increased over time; racial disparities were greater in higher-risk disease. Refusal despite provider recommendation highlights populations that may benefit from efforts to assess and reduce barriers to care

Mental distress and mental health services receipt in foreign-born survivors of cancer: A national health interview survey analysis

e19001 Background: There is a greater burden of mental illness, in survivors of cancer compared with the general population. Though mental health interventions may reduce mental distress and improve subsequent oncological outcomes, there are disparities in mental health service (MHS) receipt in immigrant populations. Therefore, we examined contemporary patterns of mental distress and mental health service receipt by immigrant status in cancer survivors in the United States. Methods: Data are collected in non-institutionalized civilian adults by the US National Health Interview Survey. For this study, harmonized data of participants reporting a cancer diagnosis were extracted from the Integrated Health Interview Series from 2009-2018. Sample weight-adjusted estimates of mental distress were defined by the validated Kessler 6 (K6). MHS receipt in the past 12 months was estimated, stratified by K6 status. Multivariable logistic regression defined adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95CI) for the odds of MHS receipt, with birth status (US vs. non-US) as the primary independent variable of interest. Results: Among 14,653 adult survivors of cancer and 207,018 adults without cancer, 4.16% vs. 3.01% had K6 >13, respectively (AOR 0.96, 95CI 0.87-1.07, P = 0.504). Among survivors of cancer, younger age, female sex, and white race were associated with K6>13, while factors associated with lower MHS receipt included non-US born status, non-white race, and older age. The distribution of severe mental illness (K6>13) did not differ by place of birth. However, non-US birth status was associated with lower MHS receipt among survivors of cancer with K6 13 (9.43% vs 37.8%, AOR 0.19, 95CI 0.08-0.45, P < 0.001) (Pinteraction= 0.002). Conclusions: In this large contemporary cross-sectional survey, though there was a similar distribution of mental distress in survivors of cancer based on birth status, non-US born adults with severe mental distress (K613) were 81% less likely to receive MHS relative to US born adults. These data suggest that immigrant survivors of cancer who suffer from severe mental distress may be a greater risk not receiving appropriate MHS, which could lead to subsequent adverse outcome. Given the demonstrated gap in use of MHS in non-US born adults with cancer and severe mental distress, increased efforts are needed to screen for mental illness and the need for MHS in immigrant populations

Association Between Travel Distance and Use of Postoperative Radiation Therapy Among Men With Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer: Does Geography Influence Treatment Decisions?

After radical prostatectomy, men with adverse pathologic features or a persistent postoperative detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are candidates for postoperative radiation therapy (PORT). Previous data have suggested disparities in receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy for adverse pathologic features according to travel distance. Among patients without adverse pathologic features (pT2 disease and negative margins), the main indication for PORT is a persistent postoperative detectable PSA. However, it remains unknown whether the rate of receipt of PORT in this cohort of men with persistently detectable PSA is related to travel distance from the treating facility. Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 170,379 men with prostate cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 managed with upfront surgery who were found to have pT2 disease with negative surgical margins. Multivariable logistic regression defined adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of receiving PORT as the primary dependent variable and distance (<5, 5-10, 10-20, ≥20 miles from the treatment facility) as the primary independent variable. Within our cohort, progressively farther distance from the treatment facility was associated with lower rates of PORT. In patients living 20 miles from the treating facility, rates of PORT of were 1.37% (referent), 1.16% (AOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79-1.04; P = .158), 0.98% (AOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.93; P = .003), and 0.64% (AOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.41-0.54; P < .001), respectively. For men with localized prostate cancer without adverse pathologic features managed with surgery, increasing distance from treatment facility was associated with lower receipt of PORT. Given that the rate of a persistent postoperative detectable PSA is unlikely to depend on the distance to the treatment facility, these findings raise the possibility that the geographic availability of radiation treatment facilities influences the decision to undergo PORT for patients with persistent postoperative detectable PSA

Factors Influencing Noncompletion of Radiation Therapy Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer

Treatment noncompletion may occur with radiation therapy (RT), especially with protracted treatment courses such as RT for prostate cancer, and may affect the efficacy of RT. For men with localized prostate cancer managed with primary RT, we evaluated associations between rates of treatment noncompletion and RT fractionation schedules. The National Cancer Database identified men diagnosed from 2004 to 2014 treated with primary RT. Patients receiving 180 cGy/fraction or 200 cGy/fraction were defined as having completed radiation therapy if they received ≥41 fractions of 180 cGy/fraction or ≥37 fractions of 200 cGy/fraction. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was defined as 5 to 8 fractions of 600 to 800 cGy/fraction. Odds ratios compared rates of treatment noncompletion, adjusting for sociodemographic covariates. A propensity-adjusted multivariable Cox regression assessed the association between treatment completion and overall survival. Of 157,657 patients, 95.7% (n = 150,847) received conventional fractionation and 4.3% (n = 6810) received SBRT. Rates of noncompletion were 12.5% (n = 18,803) among patients who received conventional fractionation and 1.9% (n = 131) among patients who received SBRT (odds ratio [OR] versus conventional, 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.26; P < .001). The rate of noncompletion among 25,727 African American patients was 12.8%, compared with 11.8% among 126,199 white patients (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09-1.19; P < .001). In a subgroup analysis, the disparity in noncompletion persisted for conventional fractionation (13.2% vs 12.3%, respectively; OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.13; P < .001), but not for SBRT (2.2% vs 1.8%, respectively; OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.79-2.00; P = .34). Noncompletion was associated with worse survival in a propensity-adjusted multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.22-1.29; P < .001). SBRT was associated with lower rates of RT noncompletion among men with localized prostate cancer. African American race was associated with greater rates of treatment noncompletion, although the disparity may be decreased among men receiving SBRT

Factors influencing noncompletion of radiotherapy among men with localized prostate cancer

199 Background: Treatment non-completion may occur with radiotherapy (RT), especially with protracted treatment courses such as RT for prostate cancer, and may affect the efficacy of RT. For men with localized prostate cancer managed with primary RT, we evaluated associations between rates of treatment non-completion and RT fractionation schedules. Methods: The National Cancer Database identified men diagnosed from 2004-2014 treated with primary RT. Patients receiving 180cGy/fraction (conventional), 200cGy/fraction (conventional), 250cGy/fraction (moderate hypofractionation), and 300cGy/fraction (moderate hypofractionation) were defined as having completed radiotherapy if they received ≥40 fractions, ≥37 fractions, ≥28 fractions, and ≥19 fractions, respectively. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was defined as 5-8 fractions of 600-800cGy/fraction. Odds ratios compared rates of treatment noncompletion, adjusting for various sociodemographic covariates. Propensity-adjusted multivariable Cox regression assessed the association between treatment completion and overall survival. Results: Of 93,079 patients, 90.5% (N = 84,260) received conventional fractionation, 2.3% (N = 2,181) received moderate hypofractionation, and 7.1% (N = 6,638) received SBRT. Rates of non-completion were 10.0% (N = 8,406) among patients who received conventional fractionation, 7.5% (N = 163) among patients who received moderate hypofractionation, and 1.7% (N = 115) among patients who received SBRT (OR versus conventional: 0.214, 95%CI 0.177-0.258, P < 0.001). The rate of non-completion among 15,417 African American patients was 11.8%, compared to 8.8% among 74,189 white patients (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.31-1.47, P < 0.001). On subgroup analysis, the disparity in non-completion persisted for conventional fractionation (12.4% vs. 9.4%, OR 1.36, 95%CI 1.29-1.44, P < 0.001) and moderate hypofractionation (13.6% vs. 6.6%, OR 2.24, 95%CI 1.52-3.29, P < 0.001), but not for SBRT (2.0% vs. 1.6%, OR 1.25, 95%CI 0.76-2.06, P = 0.384). Non-completion was associated with worse survival on propensity-adjusted multivariate analysis (HR 1.37, 95%CI 1.31-1.43, P < 0.001). Conclusions: SBRT was associated with lower rates of RT non-completion among men with localized prostate cancer. African American race was associated with greater rates of treatment non-completion, although the disparity may be decreased among men receiving SBRT