Ten-Year Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine A in Combination With Mycophenolate Mofetil After Heart Transplantation

Background. Long-term results of prospective randomized trials comparing triple immunosuppressive strategies combining tacrolimus (TAC) or cyclosporine A (CsA) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids after heart transplantation (HTX) are rarely published. Therefore, we collected long-term follow-up data of an intervention cohort 10 years after randomization. Methods. Ten-year follow-up data of 60 patients included in a prospective, randomized trial between 1998 and 2000 were analyzed as intention-to-treat (TAC-MMF n=30; CsA-MMF n=30). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) was graduated in accordance with the new ISHLT classification. Results. Survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 96.7%, 80.0%, and 66.7% for TAC-MMF and 90.0%, 83.3%, and 80.0% for CsA-MMF (P=ns). Freedom from acute rejection (AR) was significantly higher in TAC-MMF versus CsA-MMF (65.5% vs. 21.7%, log-rank 8.3, P=0.004). Freedom from ISHLT >= CAV(1) after 5 and 10 years was in TAC-MMF 64.0% and 45.8%, and in CsA-MMF 36.0% (log-rank 3.0, P=0.085) and 8.0% (log-rank 9.0, P=0.003). No difference in long-term results for freedom from coronary angioplasty or stenting, renal dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, CMV infection, or malignancy was detected. Conclusion. Cross-over effects because of treatment switch may result in impairment of significance between the groups. The long-term analysis resulted in a significant difference in manifestation of CAV between the groups after 10 years. Less rejection in the TAC-group might have contributed to the lower incidence of CAV. Superior freedom from AR and CAV in the TAC-MMF group did not result in better long-term survival

Extracorporeal Circulation During Lung Transplantation Procedures: a Meta-Analysis

Extracorporeal circulation (ECC) is an invaluable tool in lung transplantation (lutx). More than the past years, an increasing number of centers changed their standard for intraoperative ECC from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) - with differing results. This meta-analysis reviews the existing evidence. An online literature research on Medline, Embase, and PubMed has been performed. Two persons independently judged the papers using the ACROBAT-NRSI tool of the Cochrane collaboration. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used to determine whether veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) resulted in better outcomes compared with CPB. Six papers - all observational studies without randomization - were included in the analysis. All were considered to have serious bias caused by heparinization as co-intervention. Forest plots showed a beneficial trend of ECMO regarding blood transfusions (packed red blood cells (RBCs) with an average mean difference of -0.46 units 95{\%} CI = -3.72, 2.80, fresh-frozen plasma with an average mean difference of -0.65 units 95{\%} CI = -1.56, 0.25, platelets with an average mean difference of -1.72 units 95{\%} CI = -3.67, 0.23). Duration of ventilator support with an average mean difference of -2.86 days 95{\%} CI = -11.43, 5.71 and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay with an average mean difference of -4.79 days 95{\%} CI = -8.17, -1.41 were shorter in ECMO patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment tended to be superior regarding 3 month mortality (odds ratio = 0.46, 95{\%} CI = 0.21-1.02) and 1 year mortality (odds ratio = 0.65, 95{\%} CI = 0.37-1.13). However, only the ICU length of stay reached statistical significance. Meta-regression analyses showed that heterogeneity across studies (sex, year of ECMO implementation, and underlying disease) influenced differences. These data indicate a benefit of the intraoperative use of ECMO as compared with CPB during lung transplant procedures regarding short-term outcome (ICU stay). There was no statistically significant effect regarding blood transfusion needs or long-term outcome. The superiority of ECMO in lutx patients remains to be determined in larger multi-center randomized trials

The FANCM:p.Arg658* truncating variant is associated with risk of triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract: Breast cancer is a common disease partially caused by genetic risk factors. Germline pathogenic variants in DNA repair genes BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2 are associated with breast cancer risk. FANCM, which encodes for a DNA translocase, has been proposed as a breast cancer predisposition gene, with greater effects for the ER-negative and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes. We tested the three recurrent protein-truncating variants FANCM:p.Arg658*, p.Gln1701*, and p.Arg1931* for association with breast cancer risk in 67,112 cases, 53,766 controls, and 26,662 carriers of pathogenic variants of BRCA1 or BRCA2. These three variants were also studied functionally by measuring survival and chromosome fragility in FANCM−/− patient-derived immortalized fibroblasts treated with diepoxybutane or olaparib. We observed that FANCM:p.Arg658* was associated with increased risk of ER-negative disease and TNBC (OR = 2.44, P = 0.034 and OR = 3.79; P = 0.009, respectively). In a country-restricted analysis, we confirmed the associations detected for FANCM:p.Arg658* and found that also FANCM:p.Arg1931* was associated with ER-negative breast cancer risk (OR = 1.96; P = 0.006). The functional results indicated that all three variants were deleterious affecting cell survival and chromosome stability with FANCM:p.Arg658* causing more severe phenotypes. In conclusion, we confirmed that the two rare FANCM deleterious variants p.Arg658* and p.Arg1931* are risk factors for ER-negative and TNBC subtypes. Overall our data suggest that the effect of truncating variants on breast cancer risk may depend on their position in the gene. Cell sensitivity to olaparib exposure, identifies a possible therapeutic option to treat FANCM-associated tumors

Simvastatin treatment is associated with improvement in coronary endothelial function and decreased cytokine activation in patients after heart transplantation

AbstractOBJECTIVESThis study was designed to assess the association between 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibition, coronary endothelial function and cytokine activation in heart transplant recipients without angiographically detectable disease.BACKGROUNDCoronary endothelial dysfunction contributes to cardiac allograft vasculopathy. The vasoprotective effects of statins in heart transplant recipients may include restoration of endothelial function and suppression of allograft inflammatory activity.METHODSHeart transplant recipients (one to three years after heart transplant) were divided into three groups based on the total cholesterol levels: group 1 (n = 21), patients with a history of hypercholesterolemia adequately controlled with simvastatin; group 2 (n = 19), patients with hypercholesterolemia not adequately treated with simvastatin; and group 3 (n = 40), patients without hypercholesterolemia. Coronary vasomotor function and intimal thickness as well as coronary sinus and aortic cytokine concentrations (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, interleukin [IL]-6 and soluble IL-2 receptor) were investigated. In a prospective one-year follow-up study, changes in coronary endothelial function and cytokine levels were compared between 11 hypercholesterolemic patients treated with simvastatin and 9 controls.RESULTSEpicardial and microvascular endothelial functions were better in groups 1 and 3 than they were in group 2 (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). Transcardiac IL-6 and TNF-α gradients were significantly increased in groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1 (IL-6: p < 0.05; TNF-α: p < 0.01). Plaque areas were significantly increased in groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05 vs. group 3), whereas lumen area was increased in group 2 compared with group 1 (p < 0.05), demonstrating adaptive vascular remodeling. In patients treated with simvastatin, coronary endothelial function and cardiac cytokine activity significantly improved during the one-year follow-up.CONCLUSIONSInhibition of allograft inflammatory activity and attenuation of the coronary endothelial dysfunction observed in cardiac transplant recipients during treatment with simvastatin may represent an important mechanism by which HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors protect against the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Evaluation of the lung allocation score in highly urgent and urgent lung transplant candidates in Eurotransplant

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of the lung allocation score (LAS) on mortality among highly urgent (HU) and urgent (U) lung transplant (LTx) candidates in Eurotransplant (ET) and to identify useful additional parameters (LASplus). METHODS: All adult LTx candidates for whom a first request for HU or U status was made in 2008 in ET were included (N = 317). Patients were followed until LTx, death on the waiting list (WL), delisting, or closure date (i.e., January 10, 2010). The relationship between the LAS/LASplus and waiting list, post-transplant, and overall mortality was assessed with a multivariate regression model. The LAS and LASplus were decomposed into their basic waitlist and post-transplant components. RESULTS: Waiting list mortality rate was 22% and 1-year post-transplant mortality rate was 34%. The waitlist component of the LASplus was significantly associated with waiting list mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.91, p = 0.021), whereas the LAS was not (p = 0.063). The post-transplant components of both scores were significantly associated with 1-year post-transplant mortality (LAS: HR 2.69, p = 0.005; LASplus: HR 2.55, p = 0.004). Both scores strongly predicted overall mortality (LAS: HR 1.65, p = 0.008; LASplus: HR 1.72, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: LAS accurately predicts overall mortality in critically ill transplant candidates and should therefore be considered as the basis for a new lung allocation policy in ET. An adjustment of the original LAS may be indicated to accurately predict waiting list mortality. J Heart Lung Transplant 2011;30:22-8 (C) 2011 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved

Defining an extended criteria donor lung: an empirical approach based on the Eurotransplant experience1

P>The aim of this study was to design and validate a lung donor score that reflects experts' perceived risk of allograft failure. All lung donors reported to Eurotransplant from 1999 to 2007 [N = 6080] were used to create a lung donor score. Based on observed discard rates and using multivariate regression, points were assigned for six preprocurement donor variables. Donors reported in 2008 were used to validate the score [N = 751]. All the six factors significantly predicted discard; as an example, the following donor with points: age 55-59 years: 2; compromised history: 4; smoking: 2; shadow on chest X-ray: 2; purulent secretion during bronchoscopy: 2; and Pao(2)/Fio(2) ratio below 300 mmHg: 3. Discard rates for donors with a lung donor score of 6 points (class 1) was 18%, while 36% and 54% of the donors with a score of 7-8 (class 2) and 9 + (class 3) were discarded (P <0.001), respectively. In addition, the donor lung score was significantly associated with 1-year survival: class 1: 91%; class 2: 80%; and class 3: 72% (P = 0.017). The lung donor score accurately reflects the likelihood of organ acceptance and predicts patient mortality, and its application at time of donor reporting may facilitate donor risk assessment and patient selection