Evaluating the accuracy of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer version 4 (ChatGPT-4) responses to United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) frequently asked questions about dental amalgam

Abstract Background The use of artificial intelligence in the field of health sciences is becoming widespread. It is known that patients benefit from artificial intelligence applications on various health issues, especially after the pandemic period. One of the most important issues in this regard is the accuracy of the information provided by artificial intelligence applications. Objective The purpose of this study was to the frequently asked questions about dental amalgam, as determined by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is one of these information resources, to Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer version 4 (ChatGPT-4) and to compare the content of the answers given by the application with the answers of the FDA. Methods The questions were directed to ChatGPT-4 on May 8th and May 16th, 2023, and the responses were recorded and compared at the word and meaning levels using ChatGPT. The answers from the FDA webpage were also recorded. The responses were compared for content similarity in “Main Idea”, “Quality Analysis”, “Common Ideas”, and “Inconsistent Ideas” between ChatGPT-4’s responses and FDA’s responses. Results ChatGPT-4 provided similar responses at one-week intervals. In comparison with FDA guidance, it provided answers with similar information content to frequently asked questions. However, although there were some similarities in the general aspects of the recommendation regarding amalgam removal in the question, the two texts are not the same, and they offered different perspectives on the replacement of fillings. Conclusions The findings of this study indicate that ChatGPT-4, an artificial intelligence based application, encompasses current and accurate information regarding dental amalgam and its removal, providing it to individuals seeking access to such information. Nevertheless, we believe that numerous studies are required to assess the validity and reliability of ChatGPT-4 across diverse subjects

Comparison of the Finger Feeding Method Versus Syringe Feeding Method in Supporting Sucking Skills of Preterm Babies

yalaz, mehmet/0000-0002-2907-018X; Akisu, Mete/0000-0003-3697-8185;WOS: 000570572200001PubMed: 32915053Aim:The aim of this study is to compare the efficiency of a new method called "finger feeding" with a well-known technique called syringe feeding for improving sucking skills and accelerating transition to breastfeeding in preterm infants. Materials and Methods:Totally 70 babies were included in this prospective randomized controlled study. Finger feeding method was applied in Group 1 (n = 35) and syringe feeding method was applied in Group 2 (n = 35). the COMFORTneo scale (CnS), oxygen saturation, pulse, respiratory rate, body temperature, amount of breast milk taken, and vomiting data were recorded before and after both applications. Hospitalization period and time elapsed for complete transition from both methods to breastfeeding were also recorded. Results:There was no statistical difference for birth weights, mean gestational age, and vital signs recorded before and after feeding between two groups. Predicted comfort and distress scores of Group 1 determined by the CnS were significantly lower than those of Group 2. This means that babies in the finger feeding group had better comfort than the those in Group 2 (p = 0.000). Time passed for transition to breastfeeding was significantly shorter than that in Group 2 (19.4 +/- 15.0 days versus 29.7 +/- 10.2 days,p = 0.000). Group 1 had lower amount of food leakage while feeding and their average weight gain at the end of 10th day was significantly higher (322.1 +/- 82.3 g versus 252 +/- 108.4 g,p = 0.004). They also were discharged earlier than Group 2 (25.8 +/- 17.4 days versus 35.9 +/- 13.0 days,p = 0.001). Conclusion:Finger feeding method is an effective way for increasing sucking abilities, accelerating transition to breastfeeding, and shortens duration of hospitalization in preterm infants

Transoral endoscopic parathyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOEPVA) for primary hyperparathyroidism: Turkey's experience

Aim Parathyroid surgery has witnessed a significant evolution with the introduction of more efficacious preoperative localization imaging techniques and the use of rapid intraoperative parathormone assays. Parathyroid surgery can now be performed with the minimum of invasion. Through the adaptation of the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA), the technique has now been adopted for parathyroid surgery, known as the transoral endoscopic parathyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOEPVA). We present here the initial experiences of 11 centers carrying out TOEPVA surgery in Turkey. Materials and methods Participating in the study were 11 centers, all of which were tertiary care institutions carrying out endocrine surgery. A retrospective review was made of 35 primary hyperparathyroidism patients who underwent the TOEPVA procedure between July 2017 and January 2020. Results Of the total 35 patients, 32 patients underwent the TOEPVA procedure successfully. All patients but one were female, and the mean age was 47.2 (20-73) years. According to localization studies, 18 of the lesions were lower left, 12 were lower right, 3 were upper right and 2 were upper left. The mean operative time was 116 (30-225) min, and three cases were converted to an open procedure. Simultaneous thyroidectomy was performed in seven cases. The average PTH level dropped to normal within 20 min. after the resection in all cases. The complication rate was 19% (ecchymosis, subcutaneous emphysema, nasal bleeding, surgical site infection and seroma). There were neither recurrent nerve palsies, nor mental nerve root or branch injuries. The average hospital stay was 1 day. No persistence was documented on follow up. Conclusion TOEPVA is a "hidden scar" parathyroidectomy procedure that can be safely performed on parathyroid adenomas, in cases that have scar-related concerns. Having its own procedure-related complications, the procedure provides satisfactory objective results, particularly in centers experienced in endoscopic and endocrine surgery