Accuracy of patient-reported data for an online patient registry of autoimmune myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome

Disorders of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) comprise a spectrum of rare diseases causing muscle fatigability and weakness, leading to life-long effects on quality of life. We established the Dutch-Belgian registry for NMJ disorders, based on a unique combination of patient -and physician-reported information. Information on natural course, disease burden, prevalence of complications and comorbidity is collected through patient-reported standardized questionnaires and verified using medical documentation. Currently, the registry contains information of 565 Myasthenia Gravis (MG) patients and 38 Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) patients, constituting approximately 25% (MG) and 80% (LEMS) of patients in the Netherlands. This is a very large registry, with the highest participation rate per capita. In addition to confirming many disease characteristics previously described in the literature, this registry provides several novel insights. The reported rate of potentially corticosteroid-related comorbidity, including hypertension, heart disease, osteoporosis and type 2 diabetes was high, emphasizing the need to commence corticosteroid-sparing immune suppressive treatment as soon as possible. The reported rate of other auto-immune diseases is far higher than previously expected: 27% of MG and 38% of LEMS patients, and a surprisingly high number of MG patients (47%) is unaware of their antibody status. In conclusion, this registry provides a valuable collection of information regarding MG and LEMS disease course. Continuous collection of annual follow-up data will provide further longitudinal insights in disease burden, course and treatment effect. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )Neurological Motor Disorder

Autoimmune myasthenia gravis : the impact of heterogeneous patterns of muscle weakness on outcome measures and diagnosis

The distribution of muscle weakness in MG is highly heterogeneous and frequently shifts in patients. In 5% of patients MG was restricted to ocular weakness, whereas 7% of patients never had any form of ocular weakness throughout their disease course. In 83% of MG patients at least one other extra-ocular muscle was involved at the second visit.Patients with late-onset MG and the presence of additional autoimmune diseases had more exacerbations (OR = 47) and emergency treatments (OR = 26) than early-onset MG patients without other autoimmune diseases.MG-ADL (patient questionnaire on ADL) was found to be relatively insensitive to changes in generalized weakness. This led to the absence of a significant treatment response on MG-ADL in the presence of a significant response on QMG (an objective measure of muscle weakness) in the eculizumab study. A new ADL outcome measure, MGII, was shown to have a higher sensitivity for generalized weakness than MG-ADL.RoVEMP, a novel neurophysiological test, was shown to be a specific measure for myasthenic extra-ocular muscle weakness. In addition, we found a significant correlation between magnitude of decrement and the time since the last intake of pyridostigmine, supporting that RoVEMP decrement reflects reversible neuromuscular transmission failure.</p

Autoimmune myasthenia gravis : the impact of heterogeneous patterns of muscle weakness on outcome measures and diagnosis

The distribution of muscle weakness in MG is highly heterogeneous and frequently shifts in patients. In 5% of patients MG was restricted to ocular weakness, whereas 7% of patients never had any form of ocular weakness throughout their disease course. In 83% of MG patients at least one other extra-ocular muscle was involved at the second visit.Patients with late-onset MG and the presence of additional autoimmune diseases had more exacerbations (OR = 47) and emergency treatments (OR = 26) than early-onset MG patients without other autoimmune diseases.MG-ADL (patient questionnaire on ADL) was found to be relatively insensitive to changes in generalized weakness. This led to the absence of a significant treatment response on MG-ADL in the presence of a significant response on QMG (an objective measure of muscle weakness) in the eculizumab study. A new ADL outcome measure, MGII, was shown to have a higher sensitivity for generalized weakness than MG-ADL.RoVEMP, a novel neurophysiological test, was shown to be a specific measure for myasthenic extra-ocular muscle weakness. In addition, we found a significant correlation between magnitude of decrement and the time since the last intake of pyridostigmine, supporting that RoVEMP decrement reflects reversible neuromuscular transmission failure.LUMC / Geneeskund

Heterogeneity and shifts in distribution of muscle weakness in myasthenia gravis

Neurological Motor Disorder

Distinct representation of muscle weakness in QMG and MG-ADL

Neurological Motor Disorder

Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index: Sensitivity for Change in Generalized Muscle Weakness

Introduction: The recently developed Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII) is a promising measure as it has less floor effects and a higher relative efficiency in its responsiveness to treatment effect compared to other MG measures. This study aimed at validating the MGII in a Dutch cohort of MG patients and analyzing the sensitivity of MGII compared to MG-ADL for changes in generalized weakness.Methods: We analyzed (generalized items of; -gen) MGII, quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG), Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), EQ-5D visual analog, Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) and ACTIVLIM (an ADL questionnaire focusing on generalized weakness) scores in a prospective cohort of 99 MG patients. We investigated correlations between MGII and other outcome measures. We used a generalized linear model to assess whether MGIIgen had an additional sensitivity on top of MG-ADLgen for changes (A) in QMGgen in individual patients.Results: MGII had a lower floor effect (4%) compared to QMG (6%), MG-ADL (11%) and MGC (16%). MGII correlated well with QMG (r = 0.68), MG-ADL (r = 0.83) and MGC (r = 0.74). As expected, the correlations with EQ visual analog and ACTIVLIM were lower (r = -0.57 and -0.48). AMGIIgen had an additional value on top of AMG-ADLgen in the prediction of Delta QMGgen (B = 0.54, p = 0.01).Discussion: The MGII score was cross-culturally validated in a Dutch cohort of MG patients. MGII had a higher sensitivity for generalized weakness than MG-ADL.Neurological Motor Disorder

Sensitivity of MG-ADL for generalized weakness in myasthenia gravis

Development and application of statistical models for medical scientific researc

Prognostic factors for exacerbations and emergency treatments in myasthenia gravis

Neurological Motor Disorder

Repetitive ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in myasthenia gravis

Objective To validate the repetitive ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (RoVEMP) test for diagnostic use in myasthenia gravis (MG) and to investigate its value in diagnostically challenging subgroups. Methods The RoVEMP test was performed in 92 patients with MG, 22 healthy controls, 33 patients with a neuromuscular disease other than MG (neuromuscular controls), 4 patients with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, and 2 patients with congenital myasthenic syndrome. Results Mean decrement was significantly higher in patients with MG (28.4% +/- 32.2) than in healthy controls (3.2% +/- 13.9; p = 14.3% resulted in a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 82%. The sensitivity of the RoVEMP test was 80% in ocular MG and 63% in generalized MG. The RoVEMP test was positive in 6 of 7 patients with seronegative MG (SNMG) with isolated ocular weakness. Of 10 patients with SNMG with negative repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) results, 73% had an abnormal RoVEMP test. The magnitude of decrement was correlated with the time since the last intake of pyridostigmine (B = 5.40; p = 0.019). Conclusions The RoVEMP test is a new neurophysiologic test that, in contrast to RNS and single-fiber EMG, is able to measure neuromuscular transmission of extraocular muscles, which are the most affected muscles in MG. Especially in diagnostically challenging patients with negative antibody tests, negative RNS results, and isolated ocular muscle weakness, the RoVEMP test has a clear added value in supporting the diagnosis of MG. Classification of evidence This study provides Class III evidence that RoVEMP distinguishes MG from other neuromuscular diseases