Discrepancies Between Predicted and Observed Rates of Intravenous Gentamicin Delivery for Neonates

Objectives This study aimed to investigate intravenous infusions as used in the neonatal intensive care setting, to determine the effect of gentamicin dose (mg), gentamicin concentrations (mg/ml), flow rate (ml/h) and flush volume (ml) upon the length of infusion time. Methods Intravenous infusions were set up to simulate administration of gentamicin to neonates. Dextrose (10%, w/v) was administered as the primary intravenous fluid at 3.8 or 18.7 ml/h. Gentamicin doses (0.5 mg/0.2 ml, 2 mg/0.2 ml, 2.5 mg/1.0 ml, or 10 mg/1.0 ml) were delivered into the intravenous line at a T‐connection using a Graseby pump over 35 min. This was followed by a saline flush of 1 or 2 ml over a further 35 min. At the end of each experiment a 2 ml 0.9% saline bolus was given. Analysis of gentamicin collected at 5‐min intervals was by an HPLC method. Key findings The experiment demonstrated that under the infusion conditions neonates weighing 2.5 kg would receive only 80% of the drug at 60 min, increasing to 90–95% by 75 min. In extremely low birth weight neonates (0.5 kg), even lower percentage of gentamicin recovery occurred. At 60 min only 60% of the intended gentamicin dose had been delivered and this increased to only 70% by 75 min. Conclusions The delivery of gentamicin administered by intravenous infusion is substantially extended in extremely low birth weight neonates. This appeared to be primarily due to the small volumes and low infusion rates used in these patients

Discrepancies Between Predicted and Observed Rates of Intravenous Gentamicin Delivery for Neonates

Objectives This study aimed to investigate intravenous infusions as used in the neonatal intensive care setting, to determine the effect of gentamicin dose (mg), gentamicin concentrations (mg/ml), flow rate (ml/h) and flush volume (ml) upon the length of infusion time. Methods Intravenous infusions were set up to simulate administration of gentamicin to neonates. Dextrose (10%, w/v) was administered as the primary intravenous fluid at 3.8 or 18.7 ml/h. Gentamicin doses (0.5 mg/0.2 ml, 2 mg/0.2 ml, 2.5 mg/1.0 ml, or 10 mg/1.0 ml) were delivered into the intravenous line at a T‐connection using a Graseby pump over 35 min. This was followed by a saline flush of 1 or 2 ml over a further 35 min. At the end of each experiment a 2 ml 0.9% saline bolus was given. Analysis of gentamicin collected at 5‐min intervals was by an HPLC method. Key findings The experiment demonstrated that under the infusion conditions neonates weighing 2.5 kg would receive only 80% of the drug at 60 min, increasing to 90–95% by 75 min. In extremely low birth weight neonates (0.5 kg), even lower percentage of gentamicin recovery occurred. At 60 min only 60% of the intended gentamicin dose had been delivered and this increased to only 70% by 75 min. Conclusions The delivery of gentamicin administered by intravenous infusion is substantially extended in extremely low birth weight neonates. This appeared to be primarily due to the small volumes and low infusion rates used in these patients

Utility of Interleukin-12 and Interleukin-10 in Comparison with Other Cytokines and Acute-Phase Reactants in the Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis

We compared the test characteristics of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12(p-70), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and full blood count (FBC) in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. This prospective cohort study in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Dunedin hospital of patients between July 1, 2002 and February 28, 2007 included 117 neonates commenced on antibiotics for 164 episodes of suspected sepsis. Blood cultures, FBC, CRP, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12(p-70), TNF-α, and PCT were obtained at the time sepsis was first suspected and for the following 3 days. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) plots and test characteristics were determined using culture-positive sepsis as the gold standard. At the time sepsis was first suspected, the most promising individual test was IL-12(p70) with an area under the curve (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the ROC of 0.74 (0.63 to 0.86), which (with a cutoff at 75 pg/mL) had a sensitivity (95% CI) of 28% (20 to 36%) and a specificity of 98% (96 to 100%). IL-10 had a sensitivity of 17% (10 to 23%) and a specificity of 99% (97 to 100%). IL-10 and IL-12(p70) are promising diagnostic tests that can be used to confirm sepsis in neonates

Utility of Interleukin-12 and Interleukin-10 in Comparison with Other Cytokines and Acute-Phase Reactants in the Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis

We compared the test characteristics of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12(p-70), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and full blood count (FBC) in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. This prospective cohort study in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Dunedin hospital of patients between July 1, 2002 and February 28, 2007 included 117 neonates commenced on antibiotics for 164 episodes of suspected sepsis. Blood cultures, FBC, CRP, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12(p-70), TNF-α, and PCT were obtained at the time sepsis was first suspected and for the following 3 days. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) plots and test characteristics were determined using culture-positive sepsis as the gold standard. At the time sepsis was first suspected, the most promising individual test was IL-12(p70) with an area under the curve (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the ROC of 0.74 (0.63 to 0.86), which (with a cutoff at 75 pg/mL) had a sensitivity (95% CI) of 28% (20 to 36%) and a specificity of 98% (96 to 100%). IL-10 had a sensitivity of 17% (10 to 23%) and a specificity of 99% (97 to 100%). IL-10 and IL-12(p70) are promising diagnostic tests that can be used to confirm sepsis in neonates