Survival Rate, Fracture Strength and Failure Mode of Ceramic Implant Abutments After Chewing Simulation

The aim of this study was to compare titanium-reinforced ZrO2 and pure Al2O3 abutments regarding their outcome after chewing simulation and static loading. Forty-eight standard diameter implants with an external hexagon were divided into three groups of 16 implants each and restored with three different types of abutments (group A: ZrO2 abutments with titanium inserts; group B: densely sintered high-purity Al2O3 abutments; group C: titanium abutments). All abutments were fixated on the implants with gold-alloy screws at 32 Ncm torque, and metal crowns were adhesively cemented onto the abutments. The specimens were exposed to 1.2 million cycles in a chewing simulator. Surviving specimens were subsequently loaded until fracture in a static testing device. Fracture loads (N) and fracture modes were recorded. A Wilcoxon Rank test to compare fracture loads among the 3 groups and a Fisher exact test to detect group differences in fracture modes were used for statistical evaluation (

Comparison of "Look-Alike" Implant Prosthetic Retaining Screws

: The maximum preload torque of implant prosthetic retaining screws from four manufacturers and of two alloy types was measured to determine one index of interchangeability of intersystem components. Materials and Methods : Implant prosthetic retaining screws from four manufacturers (3i Implant Innovations Inc, West Palm Beach, FL; Impla-Med Inc, Sunrise, FL; Nobelpharma USA Inc, Chicago, IL; and Implant Support Systems Inc, Irvine, CA) and of two metal types (gold and titanium) were investigated using an in vitro simulation model. Five screws of each type were tightened down against a gold cylinder using a Tohnichi BTG-6 torque gauge (Tohnichi American Corporation, Northbrook, IL) until fracture occurred. Results : The 3i Implant Innovations gold and the Nobelpharma gold were not significantly different. The 3i Implant Innovations titanium and the Impla-Med gold were able to withstand less preload torque than the 3i Implant Innovations gold and the Nobelpharma gold. The Implant Support Systems titanium was able to withstand significantly more preload torque than all of the other screws. Conclusions : Interchanging implant prosthetic retaining screws could introduce new and unknown variables that may affect the long-term survival of implant fixtures and/or the implant prostheses.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74593/1/j.1532-849X.1995.tb00310.x.pd

Effect of Crown Height on the Screw Stability of Titanium Screw‐Retained Crowns

PURPOSE The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of crown height on the screw stability of screw-retained titanium implant crowns subjected to cyclic loading conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-one implants with internal hex connections were placed in epoxy resin holders. Mandibular first molar screw-retained titanium implant crowns with UCLA type, crown-abutment connections were CAD/CAM fabricated. Seven crowns of 3 different heights (6 mm, 10 mm, and 14 mm) were made. The crowns were seated onto the implants and screws were tightened to 30 Ncm. The implants were clamped into holders and stepwise cyclic loads were applied to the occlusal surface at 30-degree angles to the long axes of the crowns. The detorque values were measured after each 5 million cycles. Before increasing the applied load, the crowns were secured with new screws and tightened to 30 Ncm. Failure times, survival estimates and detorque values were then analyzed. (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS Crown height did not significantly affect detorque values. However, five 14-mm crowns failed with varying fractures during the 475 N loading condition. Overall, a significantly lower survival for 14 mm crowns was found compared to 6 mm and 10 mm crowns (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Crown heights of one-piece screw-retained titanium implant crowns did not significantly affect detorque values. Screw fracture, however, was greater for crown height of 14 mm than those of 6 mm and 10 mm