26 research outputs found

    On sets of integers which contain no three terms in geometric progression

    Full text link
    The problem of looking for subsets of the natural numbers which contain no 3-term arithmetic progressions has a rich history. Roth's theorem famously shows that any such subset cannot have positive upper density. In contrast, Rankin in 1960 suggested looking at subsets without three-term geometric progressions, and constructed such a subset with density about 0.719. More recently, several authors have found upper bounds for the upper density of such sets. We significantly improve upon these bounds, and demonstrate a method of constructing sets with a greater upper density than Rankin's set. This construction is optimal in the sense that our method gives a way of effectively computing the greatest possible upper density of a geometric-progression-free set. We also show that geometric progressions in Z/nZ behave more like Roth's theorem in that one cannot take any fixed positive proportion of the integers modulo a sufficiently large value of n while avoiding geometric progressions.Comment: 16 page

    The distribution of intermediate prime factors

    Full text link
    Let P(12)(n)P^{\left(\frac 12\right)}(n) denote the middle prime factor of nn (taking into account multiplicity). More generally, one can consider, for any α(0,1)\alpha \in (0,1), the α\alpha-positioned prime factor of nn, P(α)(n)P^{(\alpha)}(n). It has previously been shown that loglogP(α)(n)\log \log P^{(\alpha)}(n) has normal order αloglogx\alpha \log \log x, and its values follow a Gaussian distribution around this value. We extend this work by obtaining an asymptotic formula for the count of nxn\leq x for which P(α)(n)=pP^{(\alpha)}(n)=p, for primes pp in a wide range up to xx. We give several applications of these results, including an exploration of the geometric mean of the middle prime factors, for which we find that 1x1<nxlogP(12)(n)A(logx)φ1\frac 1x \sum_{1<n \le x} \log P^{\left(\frac 12 \right)}(n) \sim A(\log x)^{\varphi-1}, where φ\varphi is the golden ratio, and AA is an explicit constant. Along the way, we obtain an extension of Lichtman's recent work on the ``dissected'' Mertens' theorem sums P+(n)yΩ(n)=k1n\sum_{\substack{P^+(n) \le y \\ \Omega(n)=k}} \frac{1}{n} for large values of kk
    corecore