Direct and indirect economic effects of hunting and fishing in Colorado--1981

Includes bibliographical references

Economy of Albany, Carbon and Fremont counties, Wyoming, Rawlins BLM district, The

May 1983.Submitted to U.S. Dept. of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Colorado State Office.Bibliography: pages 60-64.Contract no. YA-553-CT0-1077

Economy of Albany, Carbon, and Sweetwater counties, Wyoming, The: description and analysis

Submitted to U.S. Dept. of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Colorado State Office, Denver, Colorado.Bibliography: pages 74-76.Contract no. YA-510-PH8-57

Economy of Lincoln, Sublette, Sweetwater and Uinita counties, Wyoming: Rock Springs BLM district, The

Submitted to U.S. Dept. of Interior, Bureau of Land Management.May 1983.Contract Nos. YA-553-CT0-1077 and YA-553-CT1-1088

Comparison of long-run forecasts of demand for fishing, hunting, and nonconsumptive wildlife recreation based on the 1980 and 1985 national surveys, A

December 1988.Bibliography: pages 39-41

Economic impacts of a rural-to-urban water transfer: a case study of Crowley County, Colorado

November, 1993.Includes bibliographical references (pages 49-51).Urban water supply agencies seeking to meet growing municipal water demands in the arid southwest are finding that the purchase of water from existing agricultural uses is, from their perspective, often more cost-effective than construction of additional storage. Colorado municipalities have been among the most active purchasers of irrigation water rights. Agriculture-to-urban water transfers have economic impacts at the local, regional and state levels. Although the transfers represent "willing buyer-willing seller" exchanges, and represent a gain for both parties to the transactions, concerns have been voiced over whether the economic values of the transacting entities fully take into account the values to the region and the state. Starting in the 1970s, water for urban use has been purchased in Crowley County, a small rural county in southeastern Colorado. Crowley County lands are irrigated from the Lower Arkansas River via the Colorado Canal. Some 85% of the water rights formerly serving 47,000 irrigated acres in Crowley County have been purchased by municipalities. This study had two main purposes. The first was to employ a nonmarket valuation technique to estimate the foregone direct economic benefits (opportunity costs) of irrigation water used in Crowley County. The second purpose was to estimate regional (direct plus secondary) employment impacts of the reduced irrigated agriculture.Grant no. 14-08-0001-GI551, Project no. 06; financed in part by the U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Geological Survey, through the Colorado Water Resources Research Institute

Economic impacts of agriculture-to-urban water transfers: a case study of Crowley County, Colorado

November 1993.Includes bibliographical references (pages 49-51).Grant no. 14-08-0001-G1551, project 06

Economic role of water in Colorado: an input-output analysis, The

September 1988.Bibliography: pages 79-82.Grant no. 14-08-0001-1411-03, Project no. G1411-03; financed in part by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey

Input-output analysis of sportsman expenditures in Colorado, An

Submitted to U.S. Dept. of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Colorado State Office, Denver, Colorado.Bibliography: page vii.Contract no. YA-510-PH8-57

Survey-based input-output model as a resource planning tool, The

January 1981.Submitted to U.S. Dept. of Interior, Bureau of Land Management.Bibliography: pages 55-58.Contract no. YA-510-PH8-57